| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone 18:25 - Aug 11 with 1247 views | KeithHaynes |
Maybe enough salary movement now to bring in someone ?
Some 13k a week saved with these three.
|  |
| |  |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:14 - Aug 11 with 1160 views | jasper_T |
Wouldn't have though Garrick was on much. Depends how much those clubs are chipping in as well, didn't Lincoln pay us a handful of loose change for Whittaker and Cullen last season?
Also makes the assumption that we were at our budget when we're probably still operating well over what is affordable. Hence the new loan that's popped up on Companies House recently. |  | | |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:21 - Aug 11 with 1150 views | Catullus |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:14 - Aug 11 by jasper_T |
Wouldn't have though Garrick was on much. Depends how much those clubs are chipping in as well, didn't Lincoln pay us a handful of loose change for Whittaker and Cullen last season?
Also makes the assumption that we were at our budget when we're probably still operating well over what is affordable. Hence the new loan that's popped up on Companies House recently. |
Who have we borrowed from, a bank or the Americans?
Lets assume there is 13k to spend, who can we get with that money? If it's two players are they going to be any better than Joseph? If it's one player, can we get who we need? Will they come here? | |
| |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:21 - Aug 11 with 1144 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:14 - Aug 11 by jasper_T |
Wouldn't have though Garrick was on much. Depends how much those clubs are chipping in as well, didn't Lincoln pay us a handful of loose change for Whittaker and Cullen last season?
Also makes the assumption that we were at our budget when we're probably still operating well over what is affordable. Hence the new loan that's popped up on Companies House recently. |
The club does not need 30 players around Fairwood. Getting them out provides 'space' for loans. Martin claims the loan player have a future with him based on development. I am not convinced. |  |
| Wise sage since Toshack era |
| |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:27 - Aug 11 with 1136 views | Whiterockin |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:21 - Aug 11 by Catullus |
Who have we borrowed from, a bank or the Americans?
Lets assume there is 13k to spend, who can we get with that money? If it's two players are they going to be any better than Joseph? If it's one player, can we get who we need? Will they come here? |
Personally I think we have missed Christie more than some will admit. If he is still without a club would £13K a week tempt him? |  | | |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:27 - Aug 11 with 1136 views | jasper_T |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:21 - Aug 11 by Catullus |
Who have we borrowed from, a bank or the Americans?
Lets assume there is 13k to spend, who can we get with that money? If it's two players are they going to be any better than Joseph? If it's one player, can we get who we need? Will they come here? |
Bank of New York Mellon. | | | |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:41 - Aug 11 with 1109 views | Catullus |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:27 - Aug 11 by jasper_T |
Bank of New York Mellon. |
Hmmm, I wonder if any of our owners have any links, how much did we borrow?
Is resloven going to come along claiming we haven't taken out a loan?
Finally, is this loan to try and get the players in Martin wants? Is it a gamble on an investment that many "Yank" haters say our owners would never make? | |
| |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:46 - Aug 11 with 1103 views | jasper_T |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:41 - Aug 11 by Catullus |
Hmmm, I wonder if any of our owners have any links, how much did we borrow?
Is resloven going to come along claiming we haven't taken out a loan?
Finally, is this loan to try and get the players in Martin wants? Is it a gamble on an investment that many "Yank" haters say our owners would never make? |
If it's not to pay back part of the CLN to an investor that got cold feet it's most likely just a cashflow loan to keep the bills paid on time. The £13m injection is probably long gone by now, and who knows what terms the Downes sale involved. We could be waiting a while for many millions.
Or borrowing to pay off Bennett's contract. | | | |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:48 - Aug 11 with 1098 views | Catullus |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:46 - Aug 11 by jasper_T |
If it's not to pay back part of the CLN to an investor that got cold feet it's most likely just a cashflow loan to keep the bills paid on time. The £13m injection is probably long gone by now, and who knows what terms the Downes sale involved. We could be waiting a while for many millions.
Or borrowing to pay off Bennett's contract. |
Good points. What if Silverstein has decided he wants out after our poor start? Nobody has suggested that yet, as far as I know.
Would that be the first puncture under our waterline? | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 20:11 - Aug 11 with 1048 views | KeithHaynes |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:14 - Aug 11 by jasper_T |
Wouldn't have though Garrick was on much. Depends how much those clubs are chipping in as well, didn't Lincoln pay us a handful of loose change for Whittaker and Cullen last season?
Also makes the assumption that we were at our budget when we're probably still operating well over what is affordable. Hence the new loan that's popped up on Companies House recently. |
It’s. Just an assessment from someone I spoke with, not firm but Garrick around 3.5, Whittaker 5 and Joseph around 4.5. | |
| |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 20:35 - Aug 11 with 993 views | Flashberryjack |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 20:11 - Aug 11 by KeithHaynes |
It’s. Just an assessment from someone I spoke with, not firm but Garrick around 3.5, Whittaker 5 and Joseph around 4.5. |
£ million ? |  |
| |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 20:47 - Aug 11 with 975 views | KeithHaynes |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 20:35 - Aug 11 by Flashberryjack |
£ million ? |
Around that for a year mate if correct, can’t see it being much kess. | |
| |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 20:49 - Aug 11 with 966 views | onehunglow |
and three with real speed nobbed off.
Great work . | |
| |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 21:13 - Aug 11 with 942 views | PawelAbbott |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 20:49 - Aug 11 by onehunglow |
and three with real speed nobbed off.
Great work . |
We don't need speed.
We bore them to the point that they stop running and then we walk past them.
It's the new Tiki Taka. They'll all be doing it soon | | | |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 21:39 - Aug 11 with 889 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 20:35 - Aug 11 by Flashberryjack |
£ million ? |
I presume it is grands per week. Total £13,000 per week. £676,000 per year saved if Lincoln and co a paying in full for the three lads on loan. Thi creates space for three players. This allows keeping Cullen and two others.
This would pay for someone like Christie £10k per week ? and White from Spurs. £3k per week.
Personally I would reintroduce Bennett if he cannot be shifted and have him off the bench for the last 15 mins of games. | |
| Wise sage since Toshack era |
| |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 21:47 - Aug 11 with 878 views | KeithHaynes |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 20:47 - Aug 11 by KeithHaynes |
Around that for a year mate if correct, can’t see it being much kess. |
Scuse my maths 😂 | |
| |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 13:35 - Aug 13 with 625 views | swan65split |
Is there a re call at all on these loans? or are season long, as it says for the season? |  | | |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 13:39 - Aug 13 with 611 views | KeithHaynes |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 13:35 - Aug 13 by swan65split |
Is there a re call at all on these loans? or are season long, as it says for the season? |
There should be a players request for January. As per Joseph when he asked to come back to the swans for Cheltenham because he felt wasted there. | |
| |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 15:23 - Aug 13 with 562 views | Kilkennyjack |
So all 3 brought to the club, given long contracts, not able to make the team, then loaned out ?
Cullen and Williams i understand. |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 17:18 - Aug 13 with 516 views | swan65split |
Thanks Keith. | | | |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:29 - Aug 13 with 463 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick all need to make an impression this season. If they cannot make at league 1 level at 21-24 years then they cannot make it in the championship.
All need to be established first team picks and score 10 goals and assists. None were in the first eleven s but early days. They need t be stand outs not 'ordinary joes'. Garrick had a promising b debut according to reports on after 17 mins | |
| Wise sage since Toshack era |
| |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:44 - Aug 13 with 454 views | jasper_T |
| With Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick gone on 19:29 - Aug 13 by ReslovenSwan1 |
Joseph, Whittaker, Garrick all need to make an impression this season. If they cannot make at league 1 level at 21-24 years then they cannot make it in the championship.
All need to be established first team picks and score 10 goals and assists. None were in the first eleven s but early days. They need t be stand outs not 'ordinary joes'. Garrick had a promising b debut according to reports on after 17 mins |
Joseph is still 20, scored 5 in 18 in his first season in senior football in League One, then was injured until we signed him and he's been shuffled around since. It's absolutely not make or break time for him yet. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
