Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum
Reply
Bromley Match Thread..
at 15:50 2 Dec 2023

Poor first half, but comfortably the worst moment was Adam Virgo revealing that he's currently playing as PSG on Football Manager. Melt.

Bromley are better organised defensively than the teams we've played recently and we need to find Plan B, because we aren't pulling them out of shape at the moment. At least the possession we've had has been higher up the pitch the longer the game's gone on.
Forum
Reply
Altrincham Match Thread
at 09:39 22 Nov 2023

Stand-out line: "Only positive is we surely won't be signing Newby on a permanent."

Great performance last night, don't think he's been mentioned yet so the only thing I wanted to add was that I thought that was Adam Clayton's best performance for a few weeks. When he's on it, we're on it.
Forum
Reply
Aldershot match thread
at 14:34 20 Nov 2023

Yep sorry, I meant crosses not corners.
Forum
Reply
Aldershot match thread
at 09:31 20 Nov 2023

Noticed something similar re: the long passes. As pedestrian as it was at times, every attempt to go long was so bad in that first half. When the game feels so slow like that there needs to be more confidence from the midfield three to receive the ball on the turn under pressure and get us forward that way because we were so ineffective whenever we tried to go long I do wonder whether that's the thinking behind Gilmour being played deeper than East in the last few games as he's usually very good in those tight spaces with the ball.
Forum
Reply
Aldershot match thread
at 09:28 20 Nov 2023

Wouldn't that be more to do with the instructions on how we defend out of possession in those areas than how we play in possession though?

I don't think anyone's denying there's an issue with the instructions, it's the idea that the instructions to play a possession-based style is inadvertently leading to us conceding from corners that I'm struggling to understand personally.
Forum
Reply
I despair
at 10:20 14 Nov 2023

I would argue it's simply that they aren't very good at defending balls into the box rather than clarity of thought and concentration being stretched to breaking point by an in-possession tactic that they've actually been managing to execute far better than, I don't know, defending crosses?
Forum
Reply
Does anyone else remember……
at 14:51 13 Nov 2023

Your first paragraph is spot on. It seems like people once again are confusing their dissatisfaction at the results with their dissatisfaction with the playing style. If we hold onto the lead at 2-1 on Saturday, is anybody on the forum today bemoaning the style of play for being boring?

And this nonsense that we never play long balls patently isn't true either. In the last game prior to Saturday our first goal came from a long ball from the goalkeeper which was finished first time by Hayes and our second came from a long ball from defence that was flicked on by Mitchell. The first goal on Saturday came from an old-fashioned through ball from midfield which you don't see a lot of these days. By setting up to play possession football first and foremost we often can draw teams out and give ourselves more space to play the ball in behind. If Moulden's taking a long goal kick every time then the opposition are obviously going to set up for that and have more defenders in deeper areas rather than trying to stop the short goal kick by having players on the edge of our area and giving us room to exploit further up the pitch.

We've scored 10 goals in our last 4 games. As "boring" as it may seem to some, in possession we're actually proving to be pretty effective and in my opinion quite varied based on the different types of goal we're scoring. Only four teams in the division have scored more than us this season.

But this post is not in defence of Jim. He absolutely HAS to sort out the defensive issues one way or another and as quickly as possible, because everything else is being undone by that. We've conceded 12 in those same four games - 7 of which have come from crosses into the box. None of which have come as a direct result of overplaying at the back and losing the ball.

In fact, we've conceded 32 goals so far this season - that's seven more than bottom-placed Kidderminster. 18 of those 32 have come from crosses into the box. We've conceded as many goals from crosses as Halifax have conceded altogether. I can only find one example of us conceding within 2/3 passes after being caught in possession in our own third - and that came from a cross into the box immediately after Keohane lost the ball in the right-back position.

There's also a serious issue with game management. Of the 13 games we've failed to win in the league this season, we've actually led in seven of them. On two occasions we've been leading, at home, by two goals and failed to win. I've pointed out the issues with the fitness of players that are being asked to play too much football but one of those games was against a Southend side that could only name three subs and two of them were against part-time teams in Maidenhead and Wealdstone. We have to be mentally tougher and be better at killing an opponent's momentum when they're trying to find a way back into a game.

You can be as effective as you like in possession, but if you're conceding 2/3 goals per game and are throwing away points from a winning position in 35% of your games then it's never going to count for much. The thing is, I know it's inherently frustrating for a lot of fans to watch players recycle the ball or play short goal kicks but those really, really aren't the things that are costing us at the moment.

This post has been edited by an administrator
Forum
Reply
I despair
at 22:58 12 Nov 2023

I'm stunned that some people still seem to think it's what we're doing IN possession that's the problem.

A defence that can't defend is the problem.
Forum
Reply
Bradford appoint new Manager
at 17:49 7 Nov 2023

He's done okay tbf. Won promotions with Fleetwood and Salford, got Scunthorpe into the League One play-offs and was sacked with them 5th in the table and his sacking by MK Dons feels harsh this early on in the season even with their high expectations.
Forum
Reply
vs Gateshead - match thread
at 10:10 26 Oct 2023

- And I also appreciate that there would be a huge amount of work and funding required to make it a reality.
Forum
Reply
vs Gateshead - match thread
at 10:01 26 Oct 2023

Of course there are similarities, but the final paragraph is exactly why they're not comparable, which (correct me if I'm wrong tonyroch) is where the frustration comes from when people suggest something along the lines of "if Exeter can do it then so can we." They have a fanbase that's more than double the size of ours and so it's unrealistic to expect for us to raise that kind of money on a regular basis and be able to compete in L1 as a fan-owned club like Exeter are.

When I'm advocating for Trust ownership I'm advocating for a realignment of expectations alongside that and my feeling is that I'd rather support a Chester that's fan-owned with the security of trust ownership and competing in the NLN than a Rochdale that are struggling to fund a competitive squad in the NL and don't have that same security net. Although I do appreciate that I'm in the minority there.
Forum
Reply
vs Gateshead - match thread
at 16:44 25 Oct 2023

Exeter were never liquidated like Chester. Exeter's fanbase is far bigger and from a more affluent area than ours though, they're not comparable IMO.
Forum
Reply
vs Gateshead - match thread
at 13:19 25 Oct 2023

The obvious difference between that period and this period is that it was the same for both teams before the introduction of subs.

It's not so much that the expectation is that players cannot be expected to play 90 minutes on a regular basis, more that the players that are having to play 90 minutes every single game are evidently going to have less energy than the players that aren't.
Forum
Reply
vs Gateshead - match thread
at 11:53 25 Oct 2023

You'd have to imagine that any pile-on (which in reality would've been a small faction of fans on Facebook and Twitter) would be a lot easier to handle than the current financial situation is proving to be. We've always had to rely heavily on free signings and loans in order to not put the future of the club at risk - what was different about that January?
Forum
Reply
vs Gateshead - match thread
at 11:26 25 Oct 2023

People are aware of this though and are suggesting that it's time for the Trust to start making those moves to try buying some of those shares, asking for share donations/money donations from fans and devising and communicating a clear plan to try and increase the shareholding to take over. That needs to happen first and foremost - nobody is expecting somebody to click their fingers and the Trust to suddenly have control.
Forum
Reply
vs Gateshead - match thread
at 11:21 25 Oct 2023

Fair points - but worth noting that Southend have actually used 21 players this season!
Forum
Reply
vs Gateshead - match thread
at 11:19 25 Oct 2023

Gambling on signings in an attempt to win promotion at the expense of the financial stability of the club is the exact thing we have all consistently criticised other club's owners for.
Forum
Reply
vs Gateshead - match thread
at 11:17 25 Oct 2023

So what's the alternative? At the Fan's Forum, Simon Gauge and Richard Knight said that the loan they're willing to put into the club would max out their investment and be the last money they're willing to put in anyway, so to get on an even keel we're going to be playing several divisions below anyway whether its' the Trust in charge or this current board, surely?
Forum
Reply
vs Gateshead - match thread
at 11:02 25 Oct 2023

Why several? How were Chester able to compete for promotion in the league below us last season as a fan-owned club with a smaller average attendance than ours?
Forum
Reply
vs Gateshead - match thread
at 11:00 25 Oct 2023

But we weren't privvy to the financial situation of the club at the time and clearly from a fan perspective thought there was more money available for transfer business than was the case. We didn't realise what a risk it was.

How have we gone out and spent transfer fees on three players, given Stockdale an increased budget in the following transfer window after that and then within a few more months ended up in such dire straits financially? That money should never have been spent if there was a chance it was going to lead us into this situation. We didn't know that was a possibility but surely it's up the board to know and understand the risks they're taking with transfer fees?
Please log in to use all the site's facilities

AtThePeake


Site Scores

Forum Votes: 2129
Comment Votes: 0
Prediction League: 0
TOTAL: 2129
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024