| Not for Profit on 13:05 - Apr 22 with 818 views | Luther27 |
I really believe that the CEO should be made accountable and prosecuted. He’s quick enough to take a bonus for failure so with that must come accountability.
We’ve had measurable rainfall the last week or so……but more or less drought like conditions a month previous and we still had raw sewage discharge. Where has all the money been spent over the years? |  | |  |
| Not for Profit on 11:32 - Apr 23 with 641 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Not for Profit on 13:05 - Apr 22 by Luther27 |
I really believe that the CEO should be made accountable and prosecuted. He’s quick enough to take a bonus for failure so with that must come accountability.
We’ve had measurable rainfall the last week or so……but more or less drought like conditions a month previous and we still had raw sewage discharge. Where has all the money been spent over the years? |
All these companies have ageing infrastructure. If the public want to modernise it they gave to pay for it . At least you know Dwr Cymru is not for profit. Perhaps they should be all like this.
The Government sold off firms to avoid the on going investment required and pensions for the workers.
If customers focus on bills then the shit goes on the beach. Clean beaches mean the public has to pay either in bills or general taxation. |  |
| |
| Not for Profit on 17:54 - Apr 23 with 564 views | SullutaCreturned |
| Not for Profit on 13:05 - Apr 22 by Luther27 |
I really believe that the CEO should be made accountable and prosecuted. He’s quick enough to take a bonus for failure so with that must come accountability.
We’ve had measurable rainfall the last week or so……but more or less drought like conditions a month previous and we still had raw sewage discharge. Where has all the money been spent over the years? |
I'd agree with you. How can a CEO of a company get a bonus of any kind when they are breaking the rules so badly? It's being rewarded fpor failure. | | | |
| Not for Profit on 18:12 - Apr 23 with 546 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Not for Profit on 17:54 - Apr 23 by SullutaCreturned |
I'd agree with you. How can a CEO of a company get a bonus of any kind when they are breaking the rules so badly? It's being rewarded fpor failure. |
Going after the CEO for a defective systematic structure nonsense. It is the same as going after the head of Shell because of global warming.
Both are Societal issues with Society has to address. Thames Water maybe be management shenanigans which is a different subject.
Passing the buck and looking for someone to blame is a naturally weak human reaction. A cop out.
[Post edited 23 Apr 18:13]
| |
| |
| Not for Profit on 19:34 - Apr 23 with 519 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Not for Profit on 17:54 - Apr 23 by SullutaCreturned |
I'd agree with you. How can a CEO of a company get a bonus of any kind when they are breaking the rules so badly? It's being rewarded fpor failure. |
The legislative framework is not good enough, people don't feel the need to resign, underperformance is tolerated. |  |
| |
| Not for Profit on 19:52 - Apr 23 with 515 views | Scotia |
| Not for Profit on 17:54 - Apr 23 by SullutaCreturned |
I'd agree with you. How can a CEO of a company get a bonus of any kind when they are breaking the rules so badly? It's being rewarded fpor failure. |
In this instance DCWW haven't broken any rules. They do regularly and there is no way the CEO's salary can be justified.
But ultimately it's the bill payers who stump up for any fines and upgrading the infrastructure, in many cases that infrastructure should be in St Fagans.
Water should never have been privatised. | | | |
| Not for Profit on 14:05 - Apr 26 with 305 views | SullutaCreturned |
| Not for Profit on 19:52 - Apr 23 by Scotia |
In this instance DCWW haven't broken any rules. They do regularly and there is no way the CEO's salary can be justified.
But ultimately it's the bill payers who stump up for any fines and upgrading the infrastructure, in many cases that infrastructure should be in St Fagans.
Water should never have been privatised. |
Dwr Cymru have broken no rules? Well that's not true,
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c24qze5pmqro#:~:text=Campaigners%20have%20accused%20Welsh%20Water,916%2C000%20hours%20the%20year%20before.
Also, there have been allegations and evidence that Dŵr Cymru Welsh Water has potentially broken laws, specifically in relation to water pollution and sewage discharges. For example, Your Herefordshire reported that a letter before action has been sent to Welsh Water alleging that their sewage operations have contributed to the pollution of the Wye, Lugg, and Usk rivers. Additionally, BBC reported that Welsh Water released sewage into rivers, lakes, and the sea for more than 968,000 hours last year.
The last bit also taken from a google search. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
