 | Forum
Reply | Madame Le Pen - what next ?
at 08:55 14 Apr 2025
Far left ?? :D
Yeah, proving thereby that for a MAGA-rooting, Afd, RN fanboy/sycophant nutjob like yourself anyone who holds opinions that don't accord with those of themselves and their doted overlords are immediately and indisputably Marxist. Your Overton window has shifted so much that it's fallen off the side of the building.
You actually think JD Vance (ffs) has valid contributions to make... 
Hitler was actually a nice bloke as well wasn't he eh... And that Mussolini well, misunderstood. Clown ! |
| Forum
Reply | Madame Le Pen - what next ?
at 12:01 8 Apr 2025
Yep, totally agree with you on all counts :)
But don't be going just yet ok !! I'll try and get to a game up your way when I can |
| Forum
Reply | Madame Le Pen - what next ?
at 10:05 8 Apr 2025
Pathetic response. But totally what one would come to expect from a painfully ignorant blowhard dullard like your self... [Post edited 8 Apr 10:06]
|
| Forum
Reply | Madame Le Pen - what next ?
at 10:00 8 Apr 2025
I have read Law but I'm not a lawyer and I'm certainly not initiated in French law. She was convicted under Article 432-15 of the Penal Code apparently - https://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocumentbank/french_penal_code_33.pdf
ARTICLE 432-15
(Ordinance no. 2000-916 of 19 September 2000 Article 3 Official Journal of 22 September 2000 in force 1 January
2002)
The destruction, misappropriation or purloining of a document or security, of private or public funds, papers,
documents or securities representing such funds, or of any other object entrusted to him, committed by person holding
public authority or discharging a public service mission, a public accountant, a public depositary or any of his
subordinates, is punished by ten years' imprisonment and a fine of €150,000.
Attempt to commit the misdemeanour referred to under the previous paragraph is subject to the same penalties.
Not sure how that allows for much interpretation (political or otherwise) tbh - and it's absolutely disgusting that the judge in question is getting death threats
As for Orban - "Je suis Marine" Non, tu es vraiment un t.wat !!!! [Post edited 8 Apr 10:02]
|
| Forum
Reply | Madame Le Pen - what next ?
at 12:11 4 Apr 2025
Nope, it is not any sort of attempt whatsoever. She broke the law so she suffers the consequences.
That is exactly what Rule Of Law entails.....
If people don't like it, tough tts |
| Forum
Reply | Why is it so hard getting immigration numbers down?
at 10:37 3 Feb 2025
Back at you Rich.
Nothing happy about it so far - what the hell happened last weekend ? The Eggers fail to score a single point and then the Swans carry on just as they were by being beaten at home by a team barely less shed than they are..
Feels almost like we're back in the Cusack days.. FFS mun... [Post edited 3 Feb 10:38]
|
| Forum
Reply | Why is it so hard getting immigration numbers down?
at 09:39 3 Feb 2025
Unfortunately human rights laws are there to protect us all - from government overreach, tyrrany and general bad behaviour/abuse of power...
Something it would behove us all to remember sometimes !! |
| Forum
Reply | Greg Wallace
at 12:46 3 Dec 2024
Ah was it when she said erm... err.....
Nah sorry you've lost me - when did this dreadful harridan ever say anything that made even the tiniest, vestigial, infinitessimal amount of sense exactly ? (cf Hartley-Brewer) [Post edited 3 Dec 2024 12:48]
|
| Forum
Reply | Greg Wallace
at 12:44 3 Dec 2024
I would definitely watch that !!
 |
| Forum
Reply | One for Tummer...
at 12:43 15 Oct 2024
You're a bit of a joke aren't you. A living breathing MAGA cliché.
Or maybe not..Are you actually real or has someone let rip with a bit of generative AI ? Hard to tell... [Post edited 15 Oct 2024 12:44]
|
| Forum
Reply | Sue Gray steps down
at 16:24 9 Oct 2024
I know, just imagine if he'd been given more time - he could have had lies written down the side of every bus in the entire country.. |
| Forum
Reply | Sue Gray steps down
at 19:12 8 Oct 2024
Sorry, my perspective is a bit different as I haven't lived in Wales since disappearing off to college in the last millennium (and not much in the way of family back there anymore  ).
I'm aware that there is a deal of frustration there from my fine countryfolk still resident though so you make a fair comment, of course.
I'm really not looking to be an apologist for him. Frankly, I would have thought Starmer, being a notably sharp individual, with the machinery he has behind him and the hostility of the "popular" press might not have made such a daft and easily avoidable gaff (a gift to the hacks). But he did, so yes, call it out - but at the same time, perspective and that (cf just Johnson on his own).... |
| Forum
Reply | Sue Gray steps down
at 16:00 8 Oct 2024
I'm not rigorously defending anything, just pointing out the somewhat stark differences and the disingenuous reporting.
To call me a die-hard Labourite would be something of a stretch to say the least  - but, full disclosure, I really hate the 'king Tories and, by any objective standard, with righteously justifiable reason.. [Post edited 8 Oct 2024 16:02]
|
| Forum
Reply | Sue Gray steps down
at 11:13 8 Oct 2024
Rich, he's got one hell of a way to go to match what preceded him ? What £76K compared to the millions on Mone's wasted PPE, Johnson redecorating the flat (the Lytle debacle) and his private residence (Brownlow) + all those free holidays, Truss absolutely rinsing the taxpayer on foreign trips and beauty treatments.
Oddly enough the transgressions of the previous administration weren't widely reported in the Fail, Torygraph or Murdoch rags. But hey, they wasted no time on reporting on this storm in a teacup. I wonder why - actually I don't, it's painfully flipping obvious !
Oh and just look, there is everybody's favourite fat Etonian shed all over the papers going on about Starmer. Absolutely no end to his hypocrisy and entitlement. Perhaps he'll write another sht book about it soon.... [Post edited 8 Oct 2024 11:16]
|
| Forum
Reply | Trump assassination attempt again
at 11:40 17 Sep 2024
True Rich.
You'd think that the office of President was too important, too prestigious, too critical for a chancer like Trump to ever get close, That one would have to be a particular class of upstanding to deserve it. However, when you look closer there's a fair selection of nausea-inducing rogues who have been there - Wilson, Jackson, Arthur etc.. Though at least back then the US was not a superpower let alone the foremost superpower - which makes the prospect of Dump all the more worrying (especially since he clearly was not subject to being shaped into a more moderate statesman by the office the first time around, as many had hoped he might be...)
Then again, those who say he would never work here - and we ended up with that mendacious, bumbling, insubstantial haystack Johnson. Not quite the same but certainly molded from the same heap of stinking sht... [Post edited 17 Sep 2024 11:44]
|
| | Baptist
|
Site Scores| Forum Votes: | 2 | | Comment Votes: | 0 | | Prediction League: | 0 | | TOTAL: | 2 |
|
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
