By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
The flat rate pay rise isn't a bad idea, it was tried one year in our place but wasn't popular as it didn't reflect peoples associated cost of living rises. Ultimately it's a staff retention thing.
Grade creep I was referring to is that if those earning less get a higher % rise eventually they'll catch up with those earning more.
I think it's about right as it is - pay award should follow independent reccomendations. % pay increases aren't ideal but it's the only way to accurately reward seniority and prevent grade creep between roles.
People in the public sector should be paid based on the complexity of their job and in some cases more depending on external market forces and associated retention issues.
In the private sector nobody would be prepared to have responsibility for a £900 million budget and employ 10000 people for £170k a year.
I think our public services are in a shocking state and we all need to pay more to get them up to scratch. Everyone should pay more or expect less.
One man who buggered off to the Carribbean when he should have been working and another who hasn't held a single local surgery and has been to the States half of the times he's been to Clacton.
My opinion on reform is based on their unworkable and unaffordable policies and the calibre of their elected representatives.
The support will come from the very people Reform want rid off local council management and their staff. The other councillors will set him and Reform up to fail, they won't be able to respond and the local people will suffer. Imagine that on a national scale!
What baffles me is why anyone would vote for them there's another thread on that with no answers.