By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Good to see you back Brian. Well the start of the censorship is on as I was going to put Too Drunk to F@ck - Dead Kennedys but YouTube wouldn't let me even view it if I didn't put my age in which I refuse as I'm not playing their game, so there it is and I've gone with this instead
Bunty - unless you had a sister you probably never came across it - and I can't remember anything about it except the cut out wardrobe on the back
I remember the comics my brothers had more as I used to nick those to read so it was Whizzer & Chips, The Beano etc but after that they got into the superhero comics so Spiderman and Thor etc and those were the ones I read the most - I remember being traumatised when Gwen Stacy was killed off.
I never dealt with any when I was conveyancing and didn't come across it. A flat held separately by each of you as freeholders is really a no-go as you can't enforce the covenants against each other that are required for a flat. That is what the freeholder of a property of leasehold flats is able to enforce against each leaseholder. However, over the course of time, and in some instances, the current freeholder couldn't be found or identified and that was causing problems for payments (breach of covenant) (and if it was a really old property the payment could be in groats or somesuch ); freehold duties; leasehold extensions etc. I presume that this was something brought in to combat that problem so the short term of a lease would no longer be an issue; nor the enforcement of the covenants; nor finding the current freeholder. You would take over the common duties of the freeholder as a group. As the joint commonholders you would be able to enforce the covenants and take over the duties and joint costs for the common areas as a group with a common interest. Whenever a flat changed hands the new owner would automatically join in the commonhold without any loss in the chain of holders. I see it doesn't seem to have taken off so maybe there is a downside even though it sounds like a good idea. Other than that not much help I'm afraid.