Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Interesting article on our weather 12:48 - Jun 1 with 2440 viewsdickythorpe

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52877912
0
Interesting article on our weather on 18:13 - Jun 2 with 531 viewsHumpty

Interesting article on our weather on 18:07 - Jun 2 by LeonWasGod

It's the look of enlightenment when you realise you've outsmarted the whole of science.


So that's what AFD looks like when he's watching Youtube? Crikey.
1
Interesting article on our weather on 18:27 - Jun 2 with 521 viewsA_Fans_Dad

Interesting article on our weather on 18:11 - Jun 2 by Humpty

Righto I will.

Anyway, Einstein and his relativities. Think he was right?


I don't know it still hasn't been proved one way or the other yet.
Time dilation certainly appears to happen, as experiments show.
We still don't even know what Gravity is, that is where #QI comes in to it, it apparently describes the Universe better than the Gravitational models which do not predict the speed of Galaxy rotation which have been emperically established.
The models require that amazing dark matter to account for it.
-1
Interesting article on our weather on 23:40 - Jun 2 with 494 viewsDJack

Interesting article on our weather on 18:27 - Jun 2 by A_Fans_Dad

I don't know it still hasn't been proved one way or the other yet.
Time dilation certainly appears to happen, as experiments show.
We still don't even know what Gravity is, that is where #QI comes in to it, it apparently describes the Universe better than the Gravitational models which do not predict the speed of Galaxy rotation which have been emperically established.
The models require that amazing dark matter to account for it.


A couple of points, "Dark Matter" & "Dark Energy" are the placeholder names for the science knowledge that they know that they are missing... They are a literal admission of missing science.

It been known for a long time that our knowledge of the sun (Sol) is limited. This is slowly being addressed with The Parker Solar Probe data (still in it's mission infancy) and the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope going fully live July (a decade from plan to live).

It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan

0
Interesting article on our weather on 10:51 - Jun 3 with 445 viewsA_Fans_Dad

Interesting article on our weather on 23:40 - Jun 2 by DJack

A couple of points, "Dark Matter" & "Dark Energy" are the placeholder names for the science knowledge that they know that they are missing... They are a literal admission of missing science.

It been known for a long time that our knowledge of the sun (Sol) is limited. This is slowly being addressed with The Parker Solar Probe data (still in it's mission infancy) and the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope going fully live July (a decade from plan to live).


No they are not "placeholder names for the science knowledge that they know that they are missing", if they were they would not be spending millions of dollars and man hours trying their best to actually find any evidence that they exist.
They would be declaring the theory falsified because it is wrong or incomplete.
Instead they just plough on regardless.
It is what is known as a fudge.
https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy
-1
Interesting article on our weather on 11:08 - Jun 3 with 441 viewsScotia

Interesting article on our weather on 20:23 - Jun 1 by A_Fans_Dad

You laugh and scoff, can you in any way prove Mr Homewood wrong?


Mr Paul Homewood is a retired accountant.
0
Interesting article on our weather on 11:43 - Jun 3 with 425 viewsScotia

Interesting article on our weather on 21:28 - Jun 1 by A_Fans_Dad

You seem to be unable to understand that he uses the Met Offices' own data to disprove their stories.
See his link to his chart.
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/climate/maps-and-data/uk-temperature-rainf
That is theproblem with these damned deniers they use data, something you guys don't get at all.
[Post edited 1 Jun 2020 21:29]


No he interprets data he doesn't understand, and puts it on a blog where other people who don't understand it read it.

One point - he says the MO have jumped the gun becasue the Met Office don't have the data for May? He wrote that article on May 30th, based on an article published on May 29th so lets say was written on the 28th. There were 3 days left in May with a very stable high pressure sat over the UK. The Met Office get data instantly - it may not have been validated, yet, but do you think validation of the data would make any difference?
0
Interesting article on our weather on 11:45 - Jun 3 with 425 viewsA_Fans_Dad

Interesting article on our weather on 11:08 - Jun 3 by Scotia

Mr Paul Homewood is a retired accountant.


Accountants are trained to work with DATA, which is what he does.
Not just any old data, but the Met Offices's own data.
Why don't you click on his links to the actual data to see for yourself.
The Met Office and the BBC are either outright lying, misrepresenting their own data, lying by ommission (ie data before 1900) or totally incompetent.
But as the errors and Headlines are always in the same direction, ie trying to shove Globull Warming down our throats so I doubt very much if it is incompetence.
-1
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024