| Can anyone explain.....? 19:15 - Oct 29 with 4607 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/28/covid-vaccinated-likely-unjabbed-i
Vaccinated people apparently spread the virus at a similar rate to unvaccinated so can anyone explain
Why we are vaccinating children who are at no risk?
PS I'm not anti-vaccination, I've had mine and I understand it offers protection to people at risk, with no long term studies it feels right to be careful with children and young people at no risk.
|  |
| |  |
| Can anyone explain.....? on 17:09 - Nov 3 with 428 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Can anyone explain.....? on 11:28 - Nov 3 by Professor |
First line.
Incorrect twice. Of course the virus has been isolated. Multiple time. Multiple publications. How can animal infection work be done without a virus?
A nice review for you
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7543926/pdf/main.pdf
Secondly 99.7% survival.
'Official' deaths are 141K. Whatever you try to argue that's about right. To get to a 99.7% survival rate that equates to an infection rate of around 47 million people. Or close to five times higher than found positive.
Now I'm prepare to believe the true infection rate is higher, but not one where close to 80% of the population have been infected.
Of course the 0.1% figure of mortality put out there by some, means everyone has been infected. Twice.
And it's not binary. Since when has healthcare simply life:death |
"'Official' deaths are 141K". With COVID of course and not Of COVID.
Purely for comparison purposes the Italian Government have just revised their numbers.
Quote "So of the 130,468 deaths registered by official statistics at the time of preparation of the new report only 3,783 would be due to the power of the virus itself."
https://www-iltempo-it.translate.goog/attualita/2021/10/21/news/rapporto-iss-mor
So that would be 3783 from 4,782,802 cases = 0.08%.
We already know that the US CDC has admitted that only 5% of it's COVID deaths are from COVID and Portugal had only 0.9% of their Deaths caused by COVID.
So the bottom line is we have no way of knowing for certain what the true Mortality numbers are for any country including the UK. |  | | |
| Can anyone explain.....? on 17:44 - Nov 3 with 413 views | Catullus |
| Can anyone explain.....? on 17:09 - Nov 3 by A_Fans_Dad |
"'Official' deaths are 141K". With COVID of course and not Of COVID.
Purely for comparison purposes the Italian Government have just revised their numbers.
Quote "So of the 130,468 deaths registered by official statistics at the time of preparation of the new report only 3,783 would be due to the power of the virus itself."
https://www-iltempo-it.translate.goog/attualita/2021/10/21/news/rapporto-iss-mor
So that would be 3783 from 4,782,802 cases = 0.08%.
We already know that the US CDC has admitted that only 5% of it's COVID deaths are from COVID and Portugal had only 0.9% of their Deaths caused by COVID.
So the bottom line is we have no way of knowing for certain what the true Mortality numbers are for any country including the UK. |
What we also know is, Covid is quite probably the straw that breaks the camels back. If you are already ill and catch covid your chances diminish greatly.
it's not the only thing though and as has been constantly said, never was. it's about hospitalisations and long term effects too. | |
| |
| Can anyone explain.....? on 18:46 - Nov 3 with 399 views | Professor |
| Can anyone explain.....? on 17:44 - Nov 3 by Catullus |
What we also know is, Covid is quite probably the straw that breaks the camels back. If you are already ill and catch covid your chances diminish greatly.
it's not the only thing though and as has been constantly said, never was. it's about hospitalisations and long term effects too. |
The best measurement is the survival after a defined period of time like a year or more. 28!days was set to reduce the apparent death rate. The with/of is something argued by a lack of understanding of infection. Many deaths caused by infection are indirect. HIV does not kill people.
It’s effects mean that people die of other infections- Freddie Mercury died of pneumonia because he had AIDS. The ONS data of excess deaths is higher.
Would 160,000 who have died be alive now without Covid? In most cases yes.
More shameful misinformation | | | |
| Can anyone explain.....? on 18:49 - Nov 3 with 395 views | Professor |
| Can anyone explain.....? on 18:46 - Nov 3 by Professor |
The best measurement is the survival after a defined period of time like a year or more. 28!days was set to reduce the apparent death rate. The with/of is something argued by a lack of understanding of infection. Many deaths caused by infection are indirect. HIV does not kill people.
It’s effects mean that people die of other infections- Freddie Mercury died of pneumonia because he had AIDS. The ONS data of excess deaths is higher.
Would 160,000 who have died be alive now without Covid? In most cases yes.
More shameful misinformation |
Not from you Cat! There may be a significant change in life expectancy post-Covid.
Time will tell | | | |
| Can anyone explain.....? on 19:18 - Nov 3 with 385 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Can anyone explain.....? on 18:46 - Nov 3 by Professor |
The best measurement is the survival after a defined period of time like a year or more. 28!days was set to reduce the apparent death rate. The with/of is something argued by a lack of understanding of infection. Many deaths caused by infection are indirect. HIV does not kill people.
It’s effects mean that people die of other infections- Freddie Mercury died of pneumonia because he had AIDS. The ONS data of excess deaths is higher.
Would 160,000 who have died be alive now without Covid? In most cases yes.
More shameful misinformation |
Again, not my shameful mis-information, blame the Italian government, the CDC and the Portuguese courts.
I am merely repeating their positions on their matter. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
