Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
The Paul Watson legacy. Was it so bad.? 11:43 - Apr 25 with 689 viewsReslovenSwan1

With 5 wins under the belt this is as good as it has been for some time.

So what is the Watson legacy. Ronald is back in form and looking a good p rospect again. Franco is a diamond and loved by the fans.

And who brought in Sheehan who is much loved ATM. Yes it was Watson. They worked together at Luton.

Vipotnik Vigoroux have been decent.

Watson was not the disaster some continue to promote.

Wise sage since Toshack era
Poll: Will Cabango and Darling sign new contracts?

0
The Paul Watson legacy. Was it so bad.? on 12:17 - Apr 25 with 616 viewsFireboy2

The problems we have faced have absolutely nothing to do with watson, the problems have always been with the owners but you will never agree with that.
0
The Paul Watson legacy. Was it so bad.? on 13:18 - Apr 25 with 545 viewsReslovenSwan1

The Paul Watson legacy. Was it so bad.? on 12:17 - Apr 25 by Fireboy2

The problems we have faced have absolutely nothing to do with watson, the problems have always been with the owners but you will never agree with that.


The owners have invested more than enough and given £500k to the fans group.. They generally left decisions to football people.

There were missed chances like signing O'Reilly but Martin screwed up by spending vital cash of his budget on Fisher. Relegation was a close call. Resigning Bony and Clucas were footballing people decisions. Fer got injured .

Pederson and Ntoe AO. were bad signings for sure. Key and Tymon are currently playing very well. Kuharevych has not delivered again this season.

Wise sage since Toshack era
Poll: Will Cabango and Darling sign new contracts?

0
The Paul Watson legacy. Was it so bad.? on 14:25 - Apr 25 with 466 viewsKeithHaynes

Watson wasn’t a disaster.

A great believer in taking anything you like to wherever you want to.
Blog: Do you want to start a career in journalism ?

0
The Paul Watson legacy. Was it so bad.? on 16:08 - Apr 25 with 355 viewsFireboy2

The Paul Watson legacy. Was it so bad.? on 13:18 - Apr 25 by ReslovenSwan1

The owners have invested more than enough and given £500k to the fans group.. They generally left decisions to football people.

There were missed chances like signing O'Reilly but Martin screwed up by spending vital cash of his budget on Fisher. Relegation was a close call. Resigning Bony and Clucas were footballing people decisions. Fer got injured .

Pederson and Ntoe AO. were bad signings for sure. Key and Tymon are currently playing very well. Kuharevych has not delivered again this season.


Yawn 🥱
0
The Paul Watson legacy. Was it so bad.? on 16:14 - Apr 25 with 339 viewsWhiterockin

The Paul Watson legacy. Was it so bad.? on 16:08 - Apr 25 by Fireboy2

Yawn 🥱


I don't think you understand, good signings are made by the owners and bad ones by their employees.
0
The Paul Watson legacy. Was it so bad.? on 16:19 - Apr 25 with 324 viewsReslovenSwan1

The Paul Watson legacy. Was it so bad.? on 16:08 - Apr 25 by Fireboy2

Yawn 🥱


It's mutual but I do not to waste people's time going on about it.

Wise sage since Toshack era
Poll: Will Cabango and Darling sign new contracts?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2025