Forum
Thread
Starmer to resign
at 12:58 16 Oct 2025

Over chinese spying scandal !! Great to hear!
Forum
Reply
One in one out scheme
at 14:48 11 Oct 2025

Yes, those who are known are supposedly checked or so we’re told. But I’d wager my mortgage that many more are slipping through completely unchecked.
The real danger lies in the not knowing. The security risk in the UK right now must be at its highest level in decades, yet the fool in charge does absolutely nothing to reassure the public or allay growing fears among ordinary citizens.
Forum
Reply
One in one out scheme
at 13:59 11 Oct 2025

Even more concerning is today’s discovery of a weapons cache at a migrant camp in Calais, reportedly bound for the UK. The phrase “weapons of war” suggests AK-47s and similar firearms which naturally raises the question: how many boatloads of fighting-age men have already entered the UK with their weapons undetected? After more than 20 years of unchecked crossings, one might reasonably assume there are now enough arms to equip a small army.

Where is the political will to confront this security threat at its source?

Perhaps most frustrating of all are those still waving “Refugees Welcome” placards, seemingly blind to the risks, and others who go out of their way to assist illegal entrants onto British shores and into local communities.
We’ve already seen unverified reports of weapons stashes in migrant hotels and videos of supposed migrants declaring they’ve come to “rule our country”. If even a fraction of this is true, the government’s complacency borders on negligence.
Forum
Reply
Covid jabs
at 10:47 11 Oct 2025

Why didn’t you answer my questions?

Take a step back and think about what actually went on what we were told at the time, and the blatant lies from the government. Remember, this was supposedly a deadly virus about to devastate the world, yet they were busy partying at Number 10.

A few more things to consider, on top of the questions I’ve already asked you:

Why were politicians exempt from the jab?

If, as the media claims, around five billion people took it worldwide, how on earth were that many doses produced in such a short space of time?

I could go on, but I’ll let it slide ...for now.
One last question though: do you honestly believe man landed on the moon?
Forum
Reply
One in one out scheme
at 10:12 11 Oct 2025

It’s not an empty slogan, it’s what the majority of people in the UK actually want. And let’s be honest, it’s not difficult to achieve if the government truly had the will to do it.

Digital ID as the answer? Hardly. The entire mass migration saga — ongoing for over 20 years — has been a carefully laid path towards implementing digital ID. Once that’s in place, we’ll be one step closer to a social credit system straight out of China’s playbook.

If you genuinely think that’s the solution, then you’re even more deluded than I originally thought.
As for the rest of your post not worth engaging with; it’s pure nonsense.
Forum
Reply
Covid jabs
at 02:18 11 Oct 2025

Absolute rubbish, you know it I know it the world knows it. Evidence is everywhere.

medical fact
Forum
Reply
Halloween , Bonny night then Chrimbo
at 14:00 10 Oct 2025

What you mean summers coming Hoorahh
Forum
Reply
One in one out scheme
at 13:56 10 Oct 2025

End mass illegal immigration full stop. There’s no middle ground, and this “one in, one out” nonsense is exactly that nonsense.
Take decisive action now, or face losing the next election. It’s really that simple.
Forum
Reply
Covid jabs
at 13:50 10 Oct 2025

I know we see this topic very differently, and that’s fine healthy debate matters.
But I have to ask, based on your comment: you say we’re here because of the vaccine so what about those who didn’t take it? Why are they still here?
[Post edited 10 Oct 13:52]
Forum
Reply
Covid jabs
at 13:45 10 Oct 2025

Why? Because some people simply don’t want to believe it. Yet there’s plenty of information out there worth questioning and examining carefully.
Here’s a fair question: why was Big Pharma granted exemption from liability? If these products were as safe and effective as claimed, shouldn’t accountability have been built in from the start?
And another: if this truly was a once-in-a-generation medical breakthrough, why did regulatory authorities in so many countries issue only temporary or emergency authorisations rather than full approval straight away?
Asking questions like these isn’t “conspiracy” it’s what any informed citizen should do when transparency and trust are on the line
[Post edited 10 Oct 13:46]
Forum
Reply
What is it with Gary's? Lineker/Neville/Glitter
at 23:19 8 Oct 2025

Ummm I’ve been outed? Care to elaborate on that ?
Forum
Reply
What is it with Gary's? Lineker/Neville/Glitter
at 10:06 8 Oct 2025

So what are you saying? Are the so called snowflakes banging on just exercising their free speech?
Forum
Reply
Covid jabs
at 10:34 7 Oct 2025

Obviously your choice but I believe you already know why your dr wants you back on them.

My advice ...stay well clear and I am no dr
Forum
Reply
Covid jabs
at 10:32 7 Oct 2025

I’ve never had one, and that’s my personal choice. When the body fights off an infection, it’s nature doing what it was designed to do. no need to interfere.

Regardless of where people stand on vaccines, the principle of choice should always remain. No one should be pressured or coerced into a medical decision.

Restricting people from work, travel, or social life based on their vaccination status raises serious ethical questions about freedom and bodily autonomy — issues that deserve open and honest debate.

It's a shame that so many people were demonised and belittled at the time for making their choice, a choice that has been proven to be the correct one ever since.
Forum
Thread
What is it with Gary's? Lineker/Neville/Glitter
at 09:37 6 Oct 2025

Ah, Neville’s at it again — the pint-sized pundit turned bargain-bin politician, blaming the white working class, middle-aged blokes, flag-wavers, and Brexit for everything wrong in Britain.
Yet, not a whisper about who’s actually committing the atrocities or the ideology behind them. Classic deflection.
What an absolute bell-whiff.

Anybody on here support him?

[Post edited 6 Oct 11:17]
Forum
Reply
Digital ID cards Starmer’s latest harebrained scheme
at 11:00 30 Sep 2025

Politicians, regardless of party, all sing from the same hymn sheet. They are little more than puppets, pulled by the strings of globalist elites.
The notion that casting your vote will bring meaningful change — that one party will act differently from the other — is laughable. It simply isn’t how the game is played.
Forum
Reply
Digital ID cards Starmer’s latest harebrained scheme
at 05:51 29 Sep 2025

After all this time, the chickens really are coming home to roost. How many people have been demonised, banned, or dismissed as “conspiracy theorists” over the past five years simply for speaking uncomfortable truths?
Everything that was ridiculed and thrown back in their faces is now emerging in plain sight. The only silver lining is that it has become so blatantly obvious that more and more people are waking up every single day.
The illegal migration plan has been in motion for over 20 years, and only now are some beginning to see it. We know it could be stopped in an instant — yet it never is. The government appears to want this unrest, to justify rolling out their phoney digital ID and to appease their masters in the WEF.

I think some posters on here and from the past deserve a massive apology
Forum
Reply
Digital ID cards Starmer’s latest harebrained scheme
at 05:33 29 Sep 2025

Are you completely mad? Digital ID will never serve the interests of the people. If you want what little freedom we still have to be eroded, then by all means usher in the ghastly digital ID. The warning signs are glaringly obvious, yet so many seem blind to them. It’s beyond belief, utterly crazy.
Forum
Reply
Immigrants
at 13:34 24 Sep 2025

£2,000 per immigrant, and that’s not even the half of it. All of it funded by hardworking taxpayers.
Forum
Reply
Immigrants
at 09:32 24 Sep 2025

Labour has been deliberately increasing immigration in both the UK and Australia. In the UK, there is the added challenge of illegal crossings across the Channel, compounding the issue. The underlying strategy appears clear: to secure long-term political advantage by expanding the voter base in their favour.
Please log in to use all the site's facilities

mangohilljack


Site Scores

Prediction League: 0
TOTAL: 0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© FansNetwork 2025