By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
The time for cautionary language has passed. Too many communities are paying the price when criminal behaviour follows unchecked illegal migration. The consequences violent crime, assaults and a growing sense of insecurity demand urgent, practical action from government, not platitudes. We must insist on a policy that both upholds our laws and protects the vulnerable: Secure the border at source with better maritime interception and international cooperation so crossings stop before they begin. Speed up decisions on asylum claims so genuine refugees are supported quickly and those with no legal basis for stay are returned without lengthy delays. Tough, humane returns: increase charter removals and strengthen diplomatic arrangements for repatriation while ensuring due process. Tackle crime, support victims: fund policing in affected areas, improve community safety measures, and expand services for victims especially women and children.
Transparent accountability: publish clear metrics and regular public updates so citizens can see what’s being done and demand results with evidence.
This isn’t about scapegoating or losing our compassion. It’s about restoring order, enforcing the law, and protecting those who are most vulnerable in our communities. If our leaders will not act, they should expect to be held accountable at the ballot box. We owe our women and children nothing less.
It’s astonishing that there hasn’t been stronger accountability for what’s come to light. We’re only beginning to uncover the full extent of this scandal, and when the truth emerges, many people will be left shocked and questioning how this was allowed to continue for so long.
For years, there were individuals and journalists who tried to raise awareness about what was happening, (one in particular and we all know who) only to be dismissed, demonised, criticised, or silenced. Regardless of personal opinions about any one figure, it’s clear that exposing uncomfortable truths should never have resulted in persecution or vilification.
The real tragedy is that this situation represents a collective failure of systems, institutions, and society to protect the most vulnerable. It’s a stain on our nation’s conscience, and rebuilding trust will take honesty, courage, and genuine reform. (no pun intended as I also don't trust reform)
Plenty out there taking the credit for exposing this but where were they 20 + years ago?
Yes, those who are known are supposedly checked or so we’re told. But I’d wager my mortgage that many more are slipping through completely unchecked. The real danger lies in the not knowing. The security risk in the UK right now must be at its highest level in decades, yet the fool in charge does absolutely nothing to reassure the public or allay growing fears among ordinary citizens.
Even more concerning is today’s discovery of a weapons cache at a migrant camp in Calais, reportedly bound for the UK. The phrase “weapons of war” suggests AK-47s and similar firearms which naturally raises the question: how many boatloads of fighting-age men have already entered the UK with their weapons undetected? After more than 20 years of unchecked crossings, one might reasonably assume there are now enough arms to equip a small army.
Where is the political will to confront this security threat at its source?
Perhaps most frustrating of all are those still waving “Refugees Welcome” placards, seemingly blind to the risks, and others who go out of their way to assist illegal entrants onto British shores and into local communities. We’ve already seen unverified reports of weapons stashes in migrant hotels and videos of supposed migrants declaring they’ve come to “rule our country”. If even a fraction of this is true, the government’s complacency borders on negligence.
Take a step back and think about what actually went on what we were told at the time, and the blatant lies from the government. Remember, this was supposedly a deadly virus about to devastate the world, yet they were busy partying at Number 10.
A few more things to consider, on top of the questions I’ve already asked you:
Why were politicians exempt from the jab?
If, as the media claims, around five billion people took it worldwide, how on earth were that many doses produced in such a short space of time?
I could go on, but I’ll let it slide ...for now. One last question though: do you honestly believe man landed on the moon?
It’s not an empty slogan, it’s what the majority of people in the UK actually want. And let’s be honest, it’s not difficult to achieve if the government truly had the will to do it.
Digital ID as the answer? Hardly. The entire mass migration saga — ongoing for over 20 years — has been a carefully laid path towards implementing digital ID. Once that’s in place, we’ll be one step closer to a social credit system straight out of China’s playbook.
If you genuinely think that’s the solution, then you’re even more deluded than I originally thought. As for the rest of your post not worth engaging with; it’s pure nonsense.
End mass illegal immigration full stop. There’s no middle ground, and this “one in, one out” nonsense is exactly that nonsense. Take decisive action now, or face losing the next election. It’s really that simple.
I know we see this topic very differently, and that’s fine healthy debate matters. But I have to ask, based on your comment: you say we’re here because of the vaccine so what about those who didn’t take it? Why are they still here?
Why? Because some people simply don’t want to believe it. Yet there’s plenty of information out there worth questioning and examining carefully. Here’s a fair question: why was Big Pharma granted exemption from liability? If these products were as safe and effective as claimed, shouldn’t accountability have been built in from the start? And another: if this truly was a once-in-a-generation medical breakthrough, why did regulatory authorities in so many countries issue only temporary or emergency authorisations rather than full approval straight away? Asking questions like these isn’t “conspiracy” it’s what any informed citizen should do when transparency and trust are on the line
I’ve never had one, and that’s my personal choice. When the body fights off an infection, it’s nature doing what it was designed to do. no need to interfere.
Regardless of where people stand on vaccines, the principle of choice should always remain. No one should be pressured or coerced into a medical decision.
Restricting people from work, travel, or social life based on their vaccination status raises serious ethical questions about freedom and bodily autonomy — issues that deserve open and honest debate.
It's a shame that so many people were demonised and belittled at the time for making their choice, a choice that has been proven to be the correct one ever since.
Ah, Neville’s at it again — the pint-sized pundit turned bargain-bin politician, blaming the white working class, middle-aged blokes, flag-wavers, and Brexit for everything wrong in Britain. Yet, not a whisper about who’s actually committing the atrocities or the ideology behind them. Classic deflection. What an absolute bell-whiff.
Politicians, regardless of party, all sing from the same hymn sheet. They are little more than puppets, pulled by the strings of globalist elites. The notion that casting your vote will bring meaningful change — that one party will act differently from the other — is laughable. It simply isn’t how the game is played.
After all this time, the chickens really are coming home to roost. How many people have been demonised, banned, or dismissed as “conspiracy theorists” over the past five years simply for speaking uncomfortable truths? Everything that was ridiculed and thrown back in their faces is now emerging in plain sight. The only silver lining is that it has become so blatantly obvious that more and more people are waking up every single day. The illegal migration plan has been in motion for over 20 years, and only now are some beginning to see it. We know it could be stopped in an instant — yet it never is. The government appears to want this unrest, to justify rolling out their phoney digital ID and to appease their masters in the WEF.
I think some posters on here and from the past deserve a massive apology
Are you completely mad? Digital ID will never serve the interests of the people. If you want what little freedom we still have to be eroded, then by all means usher in the ghastly digital ID. The warning signs are glaringly obvious, yet so many seem blind to them. It’s beyond belief, utterly crazy.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
