No court action? on 17:28 - Feb 15 with 4993 views | KeithHaynes | Was Jake the middle man ? |  |
|  |
No court action? on 17:40 - Feb 15 with 4983 views | controversial_jack | It was all about money not justice |  | |  |
No court action? on 18:08 - Feb 15 with 4958 views | max936 | Disgusting |  |
|  |
No court action? on 18:11 - Feb 15 with 4954 views | Flynnidine_Zidownes |
No court action? on 17:40 - Feb 15 by controversial_jack | It was all about money not justice |
It was all about a degenerate pervert and his mate forcing young kids into slavery to be routinely raped. |  | |  |
No court action? on 18:14 - Feb 15 with 4949 views | johnlangy | And because of who he is he's able to buy the woman off. Not only that he's able to do it with other people's money. Ours. |  | |  |
No court action? on 18:14 - Feb 15 with 4948 views | felixstowe_jack |
No court action? on 18:11 - Feb 15 by Flynnidine_Zidownes | It was all about a degenerate pervert and his mate forcing young kids into slavery to be routinely raped. |
A bit like Michael Jackson he payed out millions to the children he allegedly abused. Still people buy his records and the BBC play them. |  |
|  |
No court action? on 18:21 - Feb 15 with 4932 views | CountyJim |
No court action? on 18:14 - Feb 15 by felixstowe_jack | A bit like Michael Jackson he payed out millions to the children he allegedly abused. Still people buy his records and the BBC play them. |
Good point well made Civil court judgments and settlements are baffling on times |  | |  |
No court action? on 18:26 - Feb 15 with 4922 views | britferry | what a surprise. he didn't even admit that he ever met her |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
No court action? on 18:42 - Feb 15 with 4911 views | Kilkennyjack | 🤷â€â™‚ï¸ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
|  |
No court action? on 18:42 - Feb 15 with 4911 views | Flynnidine_Zidownes |
No court action? on 18:14 - Feb 15 by felixstowe_jack | A bit like Michael Jackson he payed out millions to the children he allegedly abused. Still people buy his records and the BBC play them. |
It’s a difficult one. He was acquitted in a criminal trial, but then he was incredibly weird around kids generally. Pretty much everyone who knew him insisted he was absolutely repulsed by any physical contact and didn’t have any sort of sex drive but who knows. |  | |  |
No court action? on 19:51 - Feb 15 with 4884 views | Kilkennyjack | No words. |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
|  |
No court action? on 20:08 - Feb 15 with 4872 views | britferry |
No court action? on 18:14 - Feb 15 by johnlangy | And because of who he is he's able to buy the woman off. Not only that he's able to do it with other people's money. Ours. |
£7.5m of it too |  |
|  |
No court action? on 20:37 - Feb 15 with 4853 views | KeithHaynes |
No court action? on 18:14 - Feb 15 by felixstowe_jack | A bit like Michael Jackson he payed out millions to the children he allegedly abused. Still people buy his records and the BBC play them. |
Pete Townsend ? Mismo. |  |
|  |
No court action? on 21:38 - Feb 15 with 4806 views | Kilkennyjack |
No court action? on 20:08 - Feb 15 by britferry | £7.5m of it too |
Might be more …? |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
|  |
No court action? on 21:48 - Feb 15 with 4800 views | Kilkennyjack | 🇬🇧 |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
|  |
No court action? on 22:12 - Feb 15 with 4777 views | controversial_jack |
No court action? on 18:11 - Feb 15 by Flynnidine_Zidownes | It was all about a degenerate pervert and his mate forcing young kids into slavery to be routinely raped. |
There were no criminal charges, just compensation |  | |  |
No court action? on 02:28 - Feb 16 with 4713 views | Dr_Parnassus |
No court action? on 22:12 - Feb 15 by controversial_jack | There were no criminal charges, just compensation |
There was none on Jimmy Savile either |  |
|  |
No court action? on 07:58 - Feb 16 with 4674 views | Flynnidine_Zidownes |
No court action? on 22:12 - Feb 15 by controversial_jack | There were no criminal charges, just compensation |
Maxwell and Epstein were charged and convicted. |  | |  |
No court action? on 11:35 - Feb 16 with 4611 views | controversial_jack | If it was about justice , then criminal charges would have been made and not a financial settlement |  | |  |
No court action? on 12:27 - Feb 16 with 4580 views | Sirjohnalot | From the complete tit he made of himself when interviewed by the BBC, there was no way in the world, he was having a trial. The publicity it would have generated, would have made the OJ Simpson trial look like a sideshow. It was only a civil case so compensation would have been the ultimate result when it inevitably would've gone against him but his lawyers will be breathing a big sigh of relief plus the complainant would now not have to be cross examined. I've represented some idiots over the years who think they know better than you, Andrew certainly seems to fit that. I did not in the statement released from his side that he wants to be 'an advocate for traficked women !' There is brazen and there's that |  | |  |
No court action? on 12:43 - Feb 16 with 4564 views | Flynnidine_Zidownes |
No court action? on 11:35 - Feb 16 by controversial_jack | If it was about justice , then criminal charges would have been made and not a financial settlement |
Criminal charges would have to be filed by the police or the DOJ. That’s still a distinct possibility I believe if one of the other accusers makes a complaint. I don’t think this is over yet. |  | |  |
No court action? on 13:20 - Feb 16 with 4519 views | PawelAbbott |
No court action? on 21:38 - Feb 15 by Kilkennyjack | Might be more …? |
The Telegraph were reporting £12M. His income is currently £20k a year on an Armed Forces pension. |  | |  |
No court action? on 13:24 - Feb 16 with 4511 views | Whiterockin |
No court action? on 13:20 - Feb 16 by PawelAbbott | The Telegraph were reporting £12M. His income is currently £20k a year on an Armed Forces pension. |
Didn't he sell his Swiss Chalet to pay this upcoming settlement. |  | |  |
No court action? on 13:46 - Feb 16 with 4475 views | onehunglow |
No court action? on 12:27 - Feb 16 by Sirjohnalot | From the complete tit he made of himself when interviewed by the BBC, there was no way in the world, he was having a trial. The publicity it would have generated, would have made the OJ Simpson trial look like a sideshow. It was only a civil case so compensation would have been the ultimate result when it inevitably would've gone against him but his lawyers will be breathing a big sigh of relief plus the complainant would now not have to be cross examined. I've represented some idiots over the years who think they know better than you, Andrew certainly seems to fit that. I did not in the statement released from his side that he wants to be 'an advocate for traficked women !' There is brazen and there's that |
It's what us laymen call taking the pyss. Andrew seem a shocking individual and the sort of guy I could spend all night with ...causing him physical discomfort ,that is. |  |
|  |
No court action? on 15:44 - Feb 16 with 4443 views | Sirjohnalot |
No court action? on 13:46 - Feb 16 by onehunglow | It's what us laymen call taking the pyss. Andrew seem a shocking individual and the sort of guy I could spend all night with ...causing him physical discomfort ,that is. |
Don’t disagree but it had to be agreed by both side. The complainant could’ve refused. |  | |  |
| |