| Poku v Kelman (didn't dare put Kelman first) 19:02 - Jul 22 with 3584 views | Myke |
So Poku's goal involvement last season was 1.4 and Kelman"s was 1.75 (regular L1 season) No denying Poku's stats are excellent, not even an out and out striker. But Kelman's are not too shabby either. Yet the reaction to their arrival/return to LR is very different on here at least (I don't do socials) Poku is almost deemed the messiah, even Clive described it as 'head turning' in his profile. Kelman on the other hand, is at best 'muted' and at worst ' move him on'
This makes me wonder why is this? Is the fact t hat Kelman underwhelmed here before, despite not getting a run of games in his best position. Is it the whole ' a prophet is never appreciated in his own land' thing? Is his apparent reluctance to sign a new contract (we have no clue on the truth of this due to our beloved CEO's policy on contract lengths) UKThere is no reason why Kelman shouldn't get the respect and excitement of Poku - but he's not. Why is that? |  | | |  |
| Poku v Kelman (didn't dare put Kelman first) on 10:15 - Jul 28 with 158 views | francisbowles |
| Poku v Kelman (didn't dare put Kelman first) on 13:02 - Jul 23 by Wilkinswatercarrier |
Apparently, all contract lengths if put into the public domain are logged into software used by all professional clubs. They can use this to see if a players contract is coming to end etc.
If it is not public domain then any information obtained by a club, either through Agent or player would be illegal.
It's actually quite a good thing to not announce the length if this accurate |
Even if this is true, it's unlikely to make a difference.
It won't stop secret meetings at motorway service station hotels or convenient leaks, heads up or whispers. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
