By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
The league statement talks about previous precedent and consistency but these two decisions are not consistent. Either both games should be replayed or both results stand and in either case Wealdstone should be considered for punishment for not completing/fulfilling a fixture.
If the amount of remaining time in the two games is a consideration then surely the wealdstone game is the one to be replayed.
The decisions that have been made provide an advantage or potential advantage to Scunthorpe come the final league table which impacts other clubs in the league.
Doesn’t make sense to me, I think both games should be addressed consistently.