For Better or worse 09:16 - Sep 1 with 915 views | GRIM | Let's look at the Ins & Outs at our club in this transfer window. 1) Ramsdale replaced by Long 2) Bednarek replaced by Quarshie 3) KWP replaced by Roerslev 4) Fernández replaced by Azaz 5) Sulemama replaced by Fellows 6) Onuacho replaced by Downs Make your own mind up. Better or Worse. |  | | |  |
For Better or worse on 10:27 - Sep 1 with 794 views | grumpy | Too early to tell. Just hope they knit together. I wish they had put more effort into the Goalkeeper and Centre Forward positions. |  | |  |
For Better or worse on 10:58 - Sep 1 with 732 views | TripleNiemi | Come back to you in the New Year / midway point in the season. |  |
|  |
For Better or worse on 11:39 - Sep 1 with 671 views | SaintNick | Ramsdale replaced by Long, sorry but your entire argument is flawed before it is started by claiming that, Long came in to replace Lumley as third choice. 1) Ramsdale replaced by Long, as I said i don't think anyone would say that this is a direct replacement. 2) Bednarek replaced by Quarshie, yes a centre back has left and another arrived, but Quarshie is not a replacement as has been shown by his position in the pecking order, when Bednarek arrived he didn't make his league debut for 8 months he was given time to develop after that. 3) KWP replaced by Roerslev, he has only played in 3 matches so far lets give him time, there is also Jelert to consider too. 4) Fernández replaced by Azaz of course Fernandes is the better player, but lets see if Azaz if the man to get us out of the Championship and in this respect he could be a good signing. 5) Sulemama replaced by Fellows This is a no brainer Fellows has done it in this division and Sulemana hasn't. 6) Onuacho replaced by Downs, As it stands Downs could be a better signing, he is certainly no worse than Onuachu was in his first games at the club |  |
| Satisfying The Bloodlust Of The Masses In Peacetime |
|  |
For Better or worse on 12:39 - Sep 1 with 604 views | GRIM |
For Better or worse on 11:39 - Sep 1 by SaintNick | Ramsdale replaced by Long, sorry but your entire argument is flawed before it is started by claiming that, Long came in to replace Lumley as third choice. 1) Ramsdale replaced by Long, as I said i don't think anyone would say that this is a direct replacement. 2) Bednarek replaced by Quarshie, yes a centre back has left and another arrived, but Quarshie is not a replacement as has been shown by his position in the pecking order, when Bednarek arrived he didn't make his league debut for 8 months he was given time to develop after that. 3) KWP replaced by Roerslev, he has only played in 3 matches so far lets give him time, there is also Jelert to consider too. 4) Fernández replaced by Azaz of course Fernandes is the better player, but lets see if Azaz if the man to get us out of the Championship and in this respect he could be a good signing. 5) Sulemama replaced by Fellows This is a no brainer Fellows has done it in this division and Sulemana hasn't. 6) Onuacho replaced by Downs, As it stands Downs could be a better signing, he is certainly no worse than Onuachu was in his first games at the club |
Thought my post would have the desired affect & get a response from you Nick. I was not saying that any of the players that we brought in are any better or any worse than the ones that have left. But I would argue that we lose a first choice keeper & replace him with a 3rd choice keeper. A 1st choice keeper should have been brought in & Baz + Macca moved down the pecking order. |  | |  |
For Better or worse on 12:42 - Sep 1 with 592 views | barry_sanchez |
For Better or worse on 12:39 - Sep 1 by GRIM | Thought my post would have the desired affect & get a response from you Nick. I was not saying that any of the players that we brought in are any better or any worse than the ones that have left. But I would argue that we lose a first choice keeper & replace him with a 3rd choice keeper. A 1st choice keeper should have been brought in & Baz + Macca moved down the pecking order. |
When its written like that only Fellows looks better, whoever thinks Bazunu is NO1 shouldn't be anywhere near a football club, McCarthy isn't any better, the same for Stephens, at least Manning will get replaced. [Post edited 1 Sep 12:42]
|  |
| He who is silent and bows his head dies every time he does so. He who speaks aloud and walks with his head held high dies only once.
—Giovanni Falcone | Poll: | What is your favourite poll? |
|  |
For Better or worse on 14:50 - Sep 1 with 515 views | Ifonly | Sulemana replaced by Fellows?? No, Dibling was replaced by Fellows. - They are similar players - They play in the same position - If we hadn't sold Dibling, we wouldn't have bought Fellows (same with Fernandes and Azaz, to spend decent money we have to sell bigger first) Sulemana wasn't replaced by anyone and didn't really need to be. |  | |  |
For Better or worse on 15:02 - Sep 1 with 488 views | Butty101 |
For Better or worse on 11:39 - Sep 1 by SaintNick | Ramsdale replaced by Long, sorry but your entire argument is flawed before it is started by claiming that, Long came in to replace Lumley as third choice. 1) Ramsdale replaced by Long, as I said i don't think anyone would say that this is a direct replacement. 2) Bednarek replaced by Quarshie, yes a centre back has left and another arrived, but Quarshie is not a replacement as has been shown by his position in the pecking order, when Bednarek arrived he didn't make his league debut for 8 months he was given time to develop after that. 3) KWP replaced by Roerslev, he has only played in 3 matches so far lets give him time, there is also Jelert to consider too. 4) Fernández replaced by Azaz of course Fernandes is the better player, but lets see if Azaz if the man to get us out of the Championship and in this respect he could be a good signing. 5) Sulemama replaced by Fellows This is a no brainer Fellows has done it in this division and Sulemana hasn't. 6) Onuacho replaced by Downs, As it stands Downs could be a better signing, he is certainly no worse than Onuachu was in his first games at the club |
1) Agree Baz was the downgrade on Ramsdale. 2) We dont have time to let Quarshie spend a season getting up to speed. Bednerek was a full international, replacing him with a 17year old is bananas. 3) KWP going on a free, meant it was inevitable that it would be a downgrade. 4) agree 5) sort of agree. 6) Nick you are having a laugh. |  |
|  |
For Better or worse on 15:33 - Sep 1 with 450 views | SaintNick |
For Better or worse on 12:39 - Sep 1 by GRIM | Thought my post would have the desired affect & get a response from you Nick. I was not saying that any of the players that we brought in are any better or any worse than the ones that have left. But I would argue that we lose a first choice keeper & replace him with a 3rd choice keeper. A 1st choice keeper should have been brought in & Baz + Macca moved down the pecking order. |
We have to agree to disagree about Bazunu, he is a Championship keeper as was shown during our last promotion season. My point was though Ramsdale came in to replace Bazunu who would be out for the season, , now he has gone Bazunu is fit again and back in, Long is to replace Lumley who also left. From this perspective our goalkeeping department is at exactly the same point it was this time 2 years ago, Bazunu number 1, then McCarthy and another keeper
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| Satisfying The Bloodlust Of The Masses In Peacetime |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
For Better or worse on 17:57 - Sep 1 with 294 views | Bridders2 |
We haven't had a decent defensive midfielder since Romeau left, let's hope he's as good...if we get him. |  | |  |
For Better or worse on 17:59 - Sep 1 with 287 views | GRIM |
For Better or worse on 14:50 - Sep 1 by Ifonly | Sulemana replaced by Fellows?? No, Dibling was replaced by Fellows. - They are similar players - They play in the same position - If we hadn't sold Dibling, we wouldn't have bought Fellows (same with Fernandes and Azaz, to spend decent money we have to sell bigger first) Sulemana wasn't replaced by anyone and didn't really need to be. |
Well spotted, you're right Fellows replaces Dibling. I'm guilty, I'd already forgotten about Dibling. |  | |  |
| |