Forum | One in one out scheme by ReslovenSwan1

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

One in one out scheme 13:19 - Oct 10 with 3553 views

So one day this week. 1000 boat people arrived and Upto 26 were removed.

This equates to 2.6% of all those travelling.

The migrant has invested £1000 having a very scary experience of possible drowning and being kept in confinement for a while and then given a bunk somewhere. There is only a 3,% chance of immediate failure and return after all that and another unknown chance of failure 1 year down the line

So what level of return risk would you consider unreasonable if you were a fit male of 35 who cannot swim. If the return risk was 30% not 3 % I think many would look at giving up on the UK

As they say on those podcast videos. What percentage do you think.?

I can see why France is not too vexed about boat migration number just to spite Farage. But what has France got to lose on increasing the return policy by ten times.?

[Post edited 10 Oct 13:23]

	Wise sage since Toshack era
Poll:	Will Cabango and Darling sign new contracts?

-1

One in one out scheme on 12:47 - Oct 23 with 186 views

Joesus_Of_Narbereth

One in one out scheme on 12:39 - Oct 23 by ReslovenSwan1

It is semantics. The French probably see their duty to stop migrants getting on boats not intercept than at sea.

I believe this is the French not carrying out their duty.

For example I believe the smugglers are on the boats themselves for a period when they t re answer to acs cons boat or call on a local beach.
The French police must know all this but it is too risky to intercept the boat when they are on the water

If the French and UK. ACTUALLY cared about human life they would not allow the smugglers to put the lives of small children at risk.

It is an operation of palming off responsibility for the risk to human life.

How is it in any way risky to tow the boats back to shore. Surely that’s far safer than letting them go further into the busiest shipping lane in the world?

Poll:

We all dream of a managerial team of Alan Tates?

One in one out scheme on 13:20 - Oct 23 with 145 views

ReslovenSwan1

One in one out scheme on 12:47 - Oct 23 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth
How is it in any way risky to tow the boats back to shore. Surely that’s far safer than letting them go further into the busiest shipping lane in the world?

I am arguing the French police are complicit in the deaths of migrants in the English channel by failing to act.

Even the BBC understands the logistics. The inflatable boat is run as a taxi. The taxi driver is one maybe two smugglers. It picks up perhaps up to 10 from a number of beaches. This means a French special squad could easily capture all people in the boat and therefore a one possible two smugglers.

Buy taking out one or two smugglers the French reduce significantly the risk to small children dying in the future. The idea that the French non interference is for safety reasons is palpably fake as it extends the snuggling.. The French are not interested is nailing smugglers that put the lives of children at risk .

[Post edited 23 Oct 13:22]

	Wise sage since Toshack era
Poll:	Will Cabango and Darling sign new contracts?

-1

One in one out scheme on 13:26 - Oct 23 with 135 views

Whiterockin

One in one out scheme on 13:20 - Oct 23 by ReslovenSwan1

[Post edited 23 Oct 13:22]

Lets be honest if the boat people were passing through the UK on their way to another country, would we try and stop them leaving.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread