| Today’s court case on 13:18 - Dec 13 with 5183 views | IAN05 |
| Today’s court case on 13:09 - Dec 13 by union_jack |
I'm more convinced than ever that the Trust must pull the deal off the table regardless of whether original terms have been agreed to or not.
Clasie, Lisa, please make sure this is discussed at the board meeting tomorrow. |
Inclined to agree, but I think the board meeting was last night |  | |  |
| Today’s court case on 13:20 - Dec 13 with 5173 views | union_jack |
| Today’s court case on 13:18 - Dec 13 by IAN05 |
Inclined to agree, but I think the board meeting was last night |
I'm mixing it up with the forum then? |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 15:05 - Dec 13 with 5050 views | monmouth |
| Today’s court case on 13:09 - Dec 13 by union_jack |
I'm more convinced than ever that the Trust must pull the deal off the table regardless of whether original terms have been agreed to or not.
Clasie, Lisa, please make sure this is discussed at the board meeting tomorrow. |
Good man!! |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 15:48 - Dec 13 with 4973 views | whiterock |
A perfect fit for Mr J | | | |
| Today’s court case on 17:17 - Dec 13 with 4801 views | Dewi1jack |
| Today’s court case on 21:35 - Dec 12 by Landore_Jack |
I wish the Trust had a set of balls to take the lying pr*ck to court. |
If the Trust had given each option a fair and unbiased write up then the vote for taking legal action may have been closer. May even have happened.
With the sort of bollox coming out in those 2 press reports alone the Trust should now be thinking "game on"
Every bit that comes out is more damning of the sellout scum and the stunts they pulled.
"I don't have to tell non shareholding directors about a deal."
Translates to " I have to tell shareholders about a deal, but fuk'em"
Lying by omission, tucking up supposed friends, leaving lads like HC, Phil and many others, looking stupid and complicit.
Making mugs of the Trust members and I s'pose, the whole fan base as everyone is now watching the result
And for the reason of truth alone, the Trust should have gone for it, once the barrister said "strong case."
If and I know it's a big IF this is fraud in any shape or form then the Trust have to involve the police.
Defrauding people of money is criminal (Common Law Criminal)
Beaky has defrauded the Trust members of a rightful monetary gain.
The way I see it,but this really is a guess, then if the Trust won't involve the Police because they don't want to, then the members can if criminal law has been broken.
Would need someone who understands Criminal Law to say yea or nay to this one.
Maybe under Company law (again needing someone who understands this section) Beaky can be banned from being a director.
Fuker will still have his shares and have to buy the Trusts under the deal (the deal that is p1sstaking itself but the bit of the deal that really does go beyond taking the p1ss) but we start to show the c**t up for the b'stard he is. |  |
| If you wake up breathing, thats a good start to your day and you'll make many thousands of people envious. |
| |
| Today’s court case on 18:01 - Dec 13 with 4687 views | bonymine |
| Today’s court case on 20:58 - Dec 12 by monmouth |
I would love Junko to be outed as a liar in a public court. I do hope they have a smoking gun. |
And calls for a new song at the Liberty methinks ;
He lies when he wants
He lies when he wants
Judas Jenkins
He lies when he wants
Followed by ;
Get out of Our Club
Get out of Our Club
You Greedy B@stard
Get out of Our Club
Pointedly aimed at him until he has gone ...Let’s give him both barrels starting tonight. |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 18:09 - Dec 13 with 4667 views | oldcob |
| Today’s court case on 18:01 - Dec 13 by bonymine |
And calls for a new song at the Liberty methinks ;
He lies when he wants
He lies when he wants
Judas Jenkins
He lies when he wants
Followed by ;
Get out of Our Club
Get out of Our Club
You Greedy B@stard
Get out of Our Club
Pointedly aimed at him until he has gone ...Let’s give him both barrels starting tonight. |
They just don't write words like that anymore. | | | |
| Today’s court case on 18:18 - Dec 13 with 4643 views | Neath_Jack |
| Today’s court case on 18:09 - Dec 13 by oldcob |
They just don't write words like that anymore. |
Ivor Novello is trying to contact him as we speak  |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Today’s court case on 18:27 - Dec 13 with 4611 views | bonymine |
| Today’s court case on 18:18 - Dec 13 by Neath_Jack |
Ivor Novello is trying to contact him as we speak |
Ok then what would you suggest ?
Maybe ‘Jenkins old chap please vacate your current position and depart this Football Club at your earliest convenience if it’s not too much trouble’.....
Put that to a tune mate and off you go 👠| |
| |
| Today’s court case on 19:22 - Dec 13 with 4524 views | Dewi1jack |
| Today’s court case on 18:27 - Dec 13 by bonymine |
Ok then what would you suggest ?
Maybe ‘Jenkins old chap please vacate your current position and depart this Football Club at your earliest convenience if it’s not too much trouble’.....
Put that to a tune mate and off you go 👠|
Have a chance of the Saga stand singing that delightful ditty to him I s'pose 
Maybe Rachmaninov, Chopin, Verdi (good Ice Cream as well!) or Mozart have penned a spiffing little tune that this delightful ditty would sound splendid with  | |
| If you wake up breathing, thats a good start to your day and you'll make many thousands of people envious. |
| |
| Today’s court case on 21:43 - Dec 13 with 4343 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
One thing is getting clearer and clearer Jenkins is a man who has no moral compass, willing to sell his long standing colleagues short for personal gain as well as the Supporters Trust.
Utterly disgusting. |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 22:55 - Dec 13 with 4244 views | Nookiejack |
it seems madness that the Yanks and Jenkins didn't pay compensation for the service of long term Directors lie Penny and O"Keefe.
If you want a shake up of the Board and bring in new blood you pay the compensation.
This now has resulted in a court case where anything could come out to save a few hundred grand - when Jenkins has already walked away with £8m - smacks of real greed. | | | |
| Today’s court case on 16:01 - Dec 14 with 4037 views | Oldjack |
What's the latest on this ,has the bloodsucker been strung up yet ? |  |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
| Today’s court case on 16:10 - Dec 14 with 4021 views | Darran |
| Today’s court case on 22:55 - Dec 13 by Nookiejack |
it seems madness that the Yanks and Jenkins didn't pay compensation for the service of long term Directors lie Penny and O"Keefe.
If you want a shake up of the Board and bring in new blood you pay the compensation.
This now has resulted in a court case where anything could come out to save a few hundred grand - when Jenkins has already walked away with £8m - smacks of real greed. |
And you’re surprised? |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 20:43 - Dec 14 with 3800 views | Private_Partz |
| Today’s court case on 16:01 - Dec 14 by Oldjack |
What's the latest on this ,has the bloodsucker been strung up yet ? |
Yep, anyone know what's occurring? |  |
| You have mission in life to hold out your hand,
To help the other guy out,
Help your fellow man.
Stan Ridgway
|
| |
| Today’s court case on 21:34 - Dec 14 with 3712 views | max936 |
The thing that stands out there is that Dineen left the board but accepted still being Vice Chairman not quite the same thing, but he left the board room and continued in his role, but they didn't in theirs will that weaken their case I wonder, even forgetting Dineen has a long standing friendship with Jenkins and co. |  |
| |
| Today’s court case on 21:41 - Dec 14 with 3688 views | Swanzay |
The club maintains the decision was due to a new rule set by the incoming owners that all directors were to hold a minimum of 5% in shares. Neither Mr Penny, who served for 12 years, or Mr Keefe ever owned a stake in Liberty Stadium club.
Just saying! |  | | |
| Today’s court case on 09:13 - Dec 16 with 3390 views | Phil_S |
| Today’s court case on 21:41 - Dec 14 by Swanzay |
The club maintains the decision was due to a new rule set by the incoming owners that all directors were to hold a minimum of 5% in shares. Neither Mr Penny, who served for 12 years, or Mr Keefe ever owned a stake in Liberty Stadium club.
Just saying! |
So by default you can assume that the two directors - Romy Chaudhari and Bobby Hernreich must both own at least 5% of the shares that are wrapped up in those owned by the Americans
Not that anybody has ever been able to get proof of it of course |  | | |
| Today’s court case on 10:56 - Dec 16 with 3332 views | monmouth |
| Today’s court case on 09:13 - Dec 16 by Phil_S |
So by default you can assume that the two directors - Romy Chaudhari and Bobby Hernreich must both own at least 5% of the shares that are wrapped up in those owned by the Americans
Not that anybody has ever been able to get proof of it of course |
Would be quite amusing if they were asked to prove that point. | |
| |
| Today’s court case on 11:47 - Dec 16 with 3300 views | Whiterockin |
| Today’s court case on 09:13 - Dec 16 by Phil_S |
So by default you can assume that the two directors - Romy Chaudhari and Bobby Hernreich must both own at least 5% of the shares that are wrapped up in those owned by the Americans
Not that anybody has ever been able to get proof of it of course |
So do Jason Levien & Steve Kaplan actually own 68% of the club or are they fronting a hedge fund. If so how many shares do the own, if any. |  | | |
| Today’s court case on 11:49 - Dec 16 with 3296 views | monmouth |
| Today’s court case on 11:47 - Dec 16 by Whiterockin |
So do Jason Levien & Steve Kaplan actually own 68% of the club or are they fronting a hedge fund. If so how many shares do the own, if any. |
As I understand it, nobody knows, and the sellers couldn't care less. That's one of the biggest outrages of their pathetic lies. Welcome to Delaware. | |
| |
| Today’s court case on 11:53 - Dec 16 with 3291 views | Whiterockin |
| Today’s court case on 11:49 - Dec 16 by monmouth |
As I understand it, nobody knows, and the sellers couldn't care less. That's one of the biggest outrages of their pathetic lies. Welcome to Delaware. |
Don't actual shareholders need to be listed somewhere legally, with their percentage of the holding shown. [Post edited 16 Dec 2017 11:54]
| | | |
| Today’s court case on 11:55 - Dec 16 with 3284 views | monmouth |
| Today’s court case on 11:53 - Dec 16 by Whiterockin |
Don't actual shareholders need to be listed somewhere legally, with their percentage of the holding shown. [Post edited 16 Dec 2017 11:54]
|
Not in Delaware, that's the point of Companies registering there. Total secrecy. Again as I understand it. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
