| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 11:22 - Jun 29 with 4402 views | Sandyman |
The updated RAFC confirmation statement (shareholders listing) is now available at the Companies House website.
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/00111019/fili
It appears that the traitors shares are still listed as being in their name and not Morton House. Guessing that is due to the EFL intervention last year. Morton House does not appear on this statement at all.
Makes previous claims of "owning 43%" of the club by some people look... erm... untrue.
[Post edited 29 Jun 2022 18:53]
|  | | |  |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 11:52 - Jun 29 with 4336 views | judd |
...and according to the Athletic article (I think it was), applications were made by Matthew Southall, David Bottomley and 2 associates of Southall's, to buy shares during the last issue.
Bottomley is still a registered shareholder but the other 3 are not. |  |
| |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 12:17 - Jun 29 with 4242 views | boromat |
Without transfer forms how can the club know who owns the shares? |  |
| |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 12:25 - Jun 29 with 4191 views | TomRAFC |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 12:17 - Jun 29 by boromat |
Without transfer forms how can the club know who owns the shares? |
It's a bit like the deeds to a house. You could give me some money and I could hand over the keys. If the deeds aren't properly exchanged then you wouldn't own the house. | |
| |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 12:55 - Jun 29 with 4086 views | jonahwhereru |
Very satisfying to see all those names of new small shareholders, like myself, in print. It is itself an affirmation of the supports rejection of any attempt to wrestle the club away from them. | | | |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 13:56 - Jun 29 with 3897 views | tony_roch975 |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 12:25 - Jun 29 by TomRAFC |
It's a bit like the deeds to a house. You could give me some money and I could hand over the keys. If the deeds aren't properly exchanged then you wouldn't own the house. |
duplicate [Post edited 29 Jun 2022 13:58]
| |
| |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 13:58 - Jun 29 with 3889 views | tony_roch975 |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 12:25 - Jun 29 by TomRAFC |
It's a bit like the deeds to a house. You could give me some money and I could hand over the keys. If the deeds aren't properly exchanged then you wouldn't own the house. |
More relevant (to the Morton House saga) is that I could take a packet of sweets from a supermarket counter, offer them at a price to a fellow shopper and we would have a contract - even though I didn't 'own' those sweets [Post edited 29 Jun 2022 13:59]
| |
| |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 14:27 - Jun 29 with 3786 views | DaleiLama |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 13:58 - Jun 29 by tony_roch975 |
More relevant (to the Morton House saga) is that I could take a packet of sweets from a supermarket counter, offer them at a price to a fellow shopper and we would have a contract - even though I didn't 'own' those sweets [Post edited 29 Jun 2022 13:59]
|
Never take sweets from strangers. They always have an ulterior motive! |  |
| |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 14:36 - Jun 29 with 3764 views | James1980 |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 14:27 - Jun 29 by DaleiLama |
Never take sweets from strangers. They always have an ulterior motive! |
https://imgflip.com/i/6l8trp
Didn't work 🙠[Post edited 29 Jun 2022 14:37]
| |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 17:54 - Jun 29 with 3443 views | Newalli |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 12:25 - Jun 29 by TomRAFC |
It's a bit like the deeds to a house. You could give me some money and I could hand over the keys. If the deeds aren't properly exchanged then you wouldn't own the house. |
Yep. Your the legal owner of the shares only when the holding is registered on the share register. | | | |
| RAFC Shareholders - Morton House = 0 on 18:10 - Jul 1 with 2971 views | Newalli |
I think technically and legally, the Attorney (under Power Of Attorney) can only act on behalf of the donor and at all times considering the best interests of such donor. Legally they cannot force the donor to do anything against that donors wishes. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
