| So Rangers interested in Whittaker 15:57 - Jan 16 with 5444 views | onehunglow |
Glasgow that is not, interested in him.
Think on this .
Good enough to make his mark at Plymouth and prove a point and now one of the biggest clubs seem keen on him but nit good enough for Russ.
I feel for this lad ,I really do.
|  |
| |  |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 18:46 - Jan 17 with 1029 views | max936 |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 18:35 - Jan 17 by KeithHaynes |
Hence the article last night. Which a few haven’t got the capacity to grasp. |
"Which a few haven’t got the capacity to grasp."
Particularly the one who is unable to absorb the facts, its a peculiar fact that he can't, then if he doesn't want to believe it, then it easy I suppose.
This situation with Whittaker has little to do with Martin, apart from the fact that he said that Morgan was down the pecking order that could have been cynical or a geedy up for Morgan. |  |
| |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 19:08 - Jan 17 with 1005 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 18:30 - Jan 17 by jack247 |
They’ve brought the player back against both his and the managers wishes. You don’t need to read too far between the lines on this one. |
The owners have been watching Whittaker pull up trees in Plymouth and read about admiring glaces from Stevie G s mate who already has Morelos, Tom Lawrence, Tillman (a US international 20), Kemar Roofe ad one or two others.
Their conclusion is "he must be damn good, why is he not playing for Swansea".
Martin rated him 'so highly' that despite Obafemi and Paterson out of the picture he still prefers Liam Cullen.
The key in his answer for me was when he mention the competition for places Morgan faced and he mentioned Fulton (a defensive midfielder). Not nice to hear for young Morgan.
I read between the lines differently to you. The US owners have not instructed winter to sell Whittaker. It is Martin that wants to sell Whittaker.
Martin put Garrick out on and never played him at all. |  |
| |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 19:23 - Jan 17 with 976 views | jack247 |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 19:08 - Jan 17 by ReslovenSwan1 |
The owners have been watching Whittaker pull up trees in Plymouth and read about admiring glaces from Stevie G s mate who already has Morelos, Tom Lawrence, Tillman (a US international 20), Kemar Roofe ad one or two others.
Their conclusion is "he must be damn good, why is he not playing for Swansea".
Martin rated him 'so highly' that despite Obafemi and Paterson out of the picture he still prefers Liam Cullen.
The key in his answer for me was when he mention the competition for places Morgan faced and he mentioned Fulton (a defensive midfielder). Not nice to hear for young Morgan.
I read between the lines differently to you. The US owners have not instructed winter to sell Whittaker. It is Martin that wants to sell Whittaker.
Martin put Garrick out on and never played him at all. |
They don’t make football decisions, they make financial decisions. | | | |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 15:51 - Jan 21 with 740 views | Dr_Winston |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 17:58 - Jan 16 by Dr_Winston |
I think he showed enough in the rare chances he had to suggest that he could have played a role for us this season. Certainly given the absences of both Oba and Paterson he would have been a natural candidate to slot into either position.
When you compare the volume of games Cullen had to the quick dismissal of Whittaker it's not hard to come to the conclusion that he's just not RM's cup of tea. The only real surprise is that there hasn't been any rumours spread about him being disruptive. Or maybe there has and I've missed them. |
"The only real surprise is that there hasn't been any rumours spread about him being disruptive. "
Well whaddaya know. |  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 16:00 - Jan 21 with 708 views | KeithHaynes |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 18:46 - Jan 17 by max936 |
"Which a few haven’t got the capacity to grasp."
Particularly the one who is unable to absorb the facts, its a peculiar fact that he can't, then if he doesn't want to believe it, then it easy I suppose.
This situation with Whittaker has little to do with Martin, apart from the fact that he said that Morgan was down the pecking order that could have been cynical or a geedy up for Morgan. |
Why people always look to blame someone to for their agenda I’ll never know.
It’s clear he’s off, accept it. As I said for me it was a clever move by the manager, and he probably got the response he thought he would get. As did the owners.
Good riddance to another player. Let’s get them out the club. They are stifling us. |  |
| |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 16:12 - Jan 21 with 676 views | Badlands |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 15:51 - Jan 21 by Dr_Winston |
"The only real surprise is that there hasn't been any rumours spread about him being disruptive. "
Well whaddaya know. |
Reported to have asked not to be included in the squad for the QPR game as he wasn’t in the right frame of mind.
Martin allowed Paterson to set the precedent. |  |
| |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 16:12 - Jan 21 with 675 views | Dr_Winston |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 16:12 - Jan 21 by Badlands |
Reported to have asked not to be included in the squad for the QPR game as he wasn’t in the right frame of mind.
Martin allowed Paterson to set the precedent. |
"Reported". | |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 16:18 - Jan 21 with 664 views | Luther27 |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 16:00 - Jan 21 by KeithHaynes |
Why people always look to blame someone to for their agenda I’ll never know.
It’s clear he’s off, accept it. As I said for me it was a clever move by the manager, and he probably got the response he thought he would get. As did the owners.
Good riddance to another player. Let’s get them out the club. They are stifling us. |
I agree with that. This is happening more often and not just at our club.
I’m not sure what the answer is apart from stopping wages and isolating them not only from the first team, but the club. However I’m assuming the PFA would have something to say I’m sure.
Either way, these wretches have a value so rid our club of them as soon as. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 17:56 - Jan 21 with 588 views | max936 |
| So Rangers interested in Whittaker on 15:51 - Jan 21 by Dr_Winston |
"The only real surprise is that there hasn't been any rumours spread about him being disruptive. "
Well whaddaya know. |
Probably because he obviously isn't, Obarfemi and Paterson have previous for causing their previous managers sleepless nights and headwork, if they worked for me they'd be gone, life is to short, to put up with employees like those two. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
