Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
One in one out 13:24 - Aug 7 with 703 viewsFlashberryjack

Starmer has negotiated a deal with France for a "One in one out" system to tackle illegal boat crossings.

Thoughts ?

Hello
Poll: Should the Senedd be Abolished

0
One in one out on 13:30 - Aug 7 with 697 viewsWhiterockin

I would rather 5,000 in 5,000 out.
0
One in one out on 13:53 - Aug 7 with 662 viewsBoundy

But we need them ,don't we ? another baby raped but its just another day .

"In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master."

0
One in one out on 13:59 - Aug 7 with 642 viewsBoundy

I'm crying

▪️ The UK pays all transport and admin costs, both directions.
▪️ France can veto any migrant we want to return, no reason required.
▪️ We can’t cross-check fingerprints of the ones they send, and they won’t run Eurodac checks for us.
▪️ We must process removals within 14 days of arrival or we lose the right to remove them.
▪️ Only around 50 migrants a week can be returned about 5% of weekly crossings.
▪️ Migrants can block their return using human rights appeals.
▪️ We can’t return those citing vague “public interest” concerns.
▪️ The UK MUST accept asylum seekers France chooses, with no independent vetting.
I

"In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master."

4
One in one out on 14:15 - Aug 7 with 621 viewsswan_si

One in one out on 13:59 - Aug 7 by Boundy

I'm crying

▪️ The UK pays all transport and admin costs, both directions.
▪️ France can veto any migrant we want to return, no reason required.
▪️ We can’t cross-check fingerprints of the ones they send, and they won’t run Eurodac checks for us.
▪️ We must process removals within 14 days of arrival or we lose the right to remove them.
▪️ Only around 50 migrants a week can be returned about 5% of weekly crossings.
▪️ Migrants can block their return using human rights appeals.
▪️ We can’t return those citing vague “public interest” concerns.
▪️ The UK MUST accept asylum seekers France chooses, with no independent vetting.
I


Speaking about the first detentions, Sir Keir said: "If you break the law to enter this country, you will face being sent back. When I say I will stop at nothing to secure our borders, I mean it."

Phew!
0
One in one out on 14:36 - Aug 7 with 589 views1983

Listening on Radio 5 live you have a 6 in100 chance of it being you.....Great that will make them think twice

Over by ere
Poll: Most likely?

0
One in one out on 16:36 - Aug 7 with 547 viewsDr_Winston

One in one out on 14:15 - Aug 7 by swan_si

Speaking about the first detentions, Sir Keir said: "If you break the law to enter this country, you will face being sent back. When I say I will stop at nothing to secure our borders, I mean it."

Phew!


Someone should test that last statement by Kier by suggesting to him that the Navy sink the boats in the channel. I bet he'd stop at that. Vacuous nonsense from him as per.

Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back.

4
One in one out on 17:56 - Aug 8 with 394 viewsmax936

One in one out on 13:59 - Aug 7 by Boundy

I'm crying

▪️ The UK pays all transport and admin costs, both directions.
▪️ France can veto any migrant we want to return, no reason required.
▪️ We can’t cross-check fingerprints of the ones they send, and they won’t run Eurodac checks for us.
▪️ We must process removals within 14 days of arrival or we lose the right to remove them.
▪️ Only around 50 migrants a week can be returned about 5% of weekly crossings.
▪️ Migrants can block their return using human rights appeals.
▪️ We can’t return those citing vague “public interest” concerns.
▪️ The UK MUST accept asylum seekers France chooses, with no independent vetting.
I


It's all one way Marcon as turned Starmer over yet again he can't lose, this clown Starmer is well on his way to bankrupting this country, he's spending our money like a man with no arms, get the clown out for gods sake.

Poll: Will it Snow this coming Winter

1
One in one out on 18:41 - Aug 8 with 362 viewsbuilthjack

One in one out on 17:56 - Aug 8 by max936

It's all one way Marcon as turned Starmer over yet again he can't lose, this clown Starmer is well on his way to bankrupting this country, he's spending our money like a man with no arms, get the clown out for gods sake.


Any scheme has to be better than the £400 million wasted on the all in, none out, Rwanda scheme.

Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.

0
Login to get fewer ads

One in one out on 18:42 - Aug 8 with 358 viewsonehunglow

One in one out on 17:56 - Aug 8 by max936

It's all one way Marcon as turned Starmer over yet again he can't lose, this clown Starmer is well on his way to bankrupting this country, he's spending our money like a man with no arms, get the clown out for gods sake.


Frightening

Poll: Christmas. Enjoyable or not

0
One in one out on 18:57 - Aug 8 with 350 viewsAnotherJohn

One in one out on 18:41 - Aug 8 by builthjack

Any scheme has to be better than the £400 million wasted on the all in, none out, Rwanda scheme.


Looks like the US may benefit from our investment.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/rwanda-agrees-to-accept-up-to-250-migrants-

The UK's existing deal with France involves paying £480m over 3 years and we can now add the extra cost of "one-in, one-out". That is on top of around £300m paid under earlier deals. Personally I think Rwanda may have had more impact - as the RoI was finding out.
0
One in one out on 19:18 - Aug 8 with 329 viewsmax936

One in one out on 18:57 - Aug 8 by AnotherJohn

Looks like the US may benefit from our investment.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/rwanda-agrees-to-accept-up-to-250-migrants-

The UK's existing deal with France involves paying £480m over 3 years and we can now add the extra cost of "one-in, one-out". That is on top of around £300m paid under earlier deals. Personally I think Rwanda may have had more impact - as the RoI was finding out.


My post is justified then, 3/4 of a billion quid plus utterly wasted by consecutive Uk Governments that comes out of the public purse ie the taxpayer, its criminal.

Poll: Will it Snow this coming Winter

0
One in one out on 21:38 - Aug 8 with 260 viewsScotia

One in one out on 17:56 - Aug 8 by max936

It's all one way Marcon as turned Starmer over yet again he can't lose, this clown Starmer is well on his way to bankrupting this country, he's spending our money like a man with no arms, get the clown out for gods sake.


It is one way. We have literally nothing to negotiate with. France have every single card and don't have to take a single migrant if they don't want to.
1
One in one out on 21:39 - Aug 8 with 259 viewsbuilthjack

One in one out on 18:57 - Aug 8 by AnotherJohn

Looks like the US may benefit from our investment.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/rwanda-agrees-to-accept-up-to-250-migrants-

The UK's existing deal with France involves paying £480m over 3 years and we can now add the extra cost of "one-in, one-out". That is on top of around £300m paid under earlier deals. Personally I think Rwanda may have had more impact - as the RoI was finding out.


Rwanda?
Nobody went there.

Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.

0
One in one out on 22:37 - Aug 8 with 231 viewsBoundy

One in one out on 18:41 - Aug 8 by builthjack

Any scheme has to be better than the £400 million wasted on the all in, none out, Rwanda scheme.


A scheme which was never given a chance to work now was it.

"In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master."

1
One in one out on 22:44 - Aug 8 with 217 viewsWhiterockin

One in one out on 22:37 - Aug 8 by Boundy

A scheme which was never given a chance to work now was it.


The USA seem to think it has legs.
0
One in one out on 22:48 - Aug 8 with 202 viewsmajorraglan

One in one out on 22:37 - Aug 8 by Boundy

A scheme which was never given a chance to work now was it.


Because it was incompatible with existing legislation. You can’t flog a dead horse!
0
One in one out on 22:54 - Aug 8 with 189 viewsScotia

One in one out on 22:37 - Aug 8 by Boundy

A scheme which was never given a chance to work now was it.


Rwanda claimed they could only take 1000 anyway. At the absolute minimum rate of the deal with France, Rwanda would have reached capacity within 6 months.

The Rwanda scheme was a very, very, very expensive smoke screen.
1
One in one out on 05:26 - Aug 9 with 110 viewsAnotherJohn

One in one out on 22:48 - Aug 8 by majorraglan

Because it was incompatible with existing legislation. You can’t flog a dead horse!


Even after the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024? I think many would disagree. What legislation do you have in mind?
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© FansNetwork 2025