| My mandatory SWP thread post match... 17:20 - Sep 15 with 1580 views | QPR_ARG |
...goes like this:
He had one of the best matches I've seen from him since he joined.
Still not good enough.
|  | | |  |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 17:42 - Sep 15 with 1501 views | BklynRanger |
I thought he was good enough today tbh
Looked sharp and linked and challenged well
Finally competing properly for his place |  | | |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 17:44 - Sep 15 with 1487 views | Cornish_oooRRRR |
"He had one of the best matches I've seen from him since he joined...."
But would have liked to see Adel instead
|  |
| |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:18 - Sep 15 with 1397 views | N12Hoop |
When i saw him in the lineup it put me in a bad mood. If we can't play either Taarabt or Hoilett at home then when are they going to get a game? But fair play he did well, but we have better players |  |
| |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:22 - Sep 15 with 1378 views | ChurchOfLes |
He tracked back and got involved. Good performance in my eyes.
and yes, probably not good enough. |  | | |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:27 - Sep 15 with 1337 views | Amancalledhorse |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 17:44 - Sep 15 by Cornish_oooRRRR |
"He had one of the best matches I've seen from him since he joined...."
But would have liked to see Adel instead
|
If those injuries didn't happen in the first half, I expect we may have seen Taraabt and/or Hoilet! |  | | |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:32 - Sep 15 with 1315 views | 18StoneOfHoop |
4 year contract and the number 10 shirt indicating that he's our main man.
Single-handedly takes the blame for an all-round shyte team and inept managerial tactical performance on August 18th.
Ostracised since then.What's it all about,Sparky? |  |
| 'I'm 18 with a bullet.Got my finger on the trigger,I'm gonna pull it.."
Love,Peace and Fook Chelski!
More like 20StoneOfHoop now.
Let's face it I'm not getting any thinner.
Pass the cake and pies please. |
| |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:37 - Sep 15 with 1285 views | BklynRanger |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:32 - Sep 15 by 18StoneOfHoop |
4 year contract and the number 10 shirt indicating that he's our main man.
Single-handedly takes the blame for an all-round shyte team and inept managerial tactical performance on August 18th.
Ostracised since then.What's it all about,Sparky? |
I think the post above yours explains it, 18.
He only had one attacking sub left in the 2nd half and it was reasonable to make that Cisse | | | |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:41 - Sep 15 with 1269 views | HAYESBOY |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:37 - Sep 15 by BklynRanger |
I think the post above yours explains it, 18.
He only had one attacking sub left in the 2nd half and it was reasonable to make that Cisse |
Also we dont know what kind of reaction Tarbs has given in training during the week. |  |
| Smells like a trout farm in here |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:43 - Sep 15 with 1257 views | Jamie |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:32 - Sep 15 by 18StoneOfHoop |
4 year contract and the number 10 shirt indicating that he's our main man.
Single-handedly takes the blame for an all-round shyte team and inept managerial tactical performance on August 18th.
Ostracised since then.What's it all about,Sparky? |
Depends who handed out the contract..
As for SWP, fully justified his selection today IMO. |  | | |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:48 - Sep 15 with 1240 views | Juzzie |
My only niggle with him was that he trotted into the middle too often. He's a winger.... go to the byline and that gives the opposition two choices;
a) Let him stand there own his own but at the risk of receiving a cross and then being able to cross into the box himself
b) a defender goes across to cover him but that leaves a gap in the middle for us to exploit.
By trotting in, all he did was help condense their defence and not giving us either of those options. Chelsea did exactly this in a little flurry they had around 80 mins and it put us under a little pressure.
|  | | |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:55 - Sep 15 with 1210 views | baz_qpr |
He was excellent until he got in the final third then he was poor same for Park. But we were playing the European champions. Expect the same for spurs but reading and west ham we need better attacking quality wide |  | | |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 18:56 - Sep 15 with 1203 views | Antti_Heinola |
Agree with Arg - he did well today, but I'd still play Adel, Hoilett or Mackie in front of him.
He squeezed in because he was supposed to - we tried to keep it compact, emphasising not losing first, which, given our start to the season, was an understandable tactic. |  |
| |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 19:16 - Sep 15 with 1141 views | TearsOfaClown |
oh yes - he put in a "good shift", "covered 110% of the pitch", "great stats" . . . and still useless.
Lucky for us he is not a goal scorer.
|  | | |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 19:28 - Sep 15 with 1092 views | cheeseydane |
Imo he played to nullify the attacking threat of Ashely Cole, because of his willingness to track back and tackle etc., and to a great extent it worked a treat.
If we had not been playing one of the top four, then most likely Adel and Hoilet would have preferred.
Its a long season, and a big squad.Different players for different jobs, for different occasions.
Correct decision and job done.
|  |
| Technology advances, unfortunately humans do not. |
| |
| My mandatory SWP thread post match... on 19:28 - Sep 15 with 1091 views | kensalriser |
No complaints with Granero being in the team ahead of Taarabt. But Park, SWP and Mackie? Finally we have the right players to play with Taarabt for the first time and he can't get on the pitch. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
