Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Furlong 18:13 - Apr 28 with 9419 viewsGloucs_R

Coming home??


Poll: Are we staying up?

1
Furlong on 15:30 - Apr 29 with 1269 viewsTheChef

Furlong on 15:26 - Apr 29 by Northernr

Wouldn't be a bad option on our budget though, and comes with an actual long throw which for quite some time now has been the only time we ever look like scoring a goal.


However we won't have Jimmy Dunne to actually win headers...

Poll: How old is everyone on here?

1
Furlong on 15:39 - Apr 29 with 1196 viewsGaryHaddock

Furlong on 10:01 - Apr 29 by francisbowles

Because he was a sellable asset. One of many times we didn't have many. At a time when we were in, even more desperate than usual, need of staying within FFP limits.


I get that, but it was for £1.5m wasn't it?

Since then we've signed Kane, Ashby, Santos, Cannon, Laird.

Sure all those signing on fees / loan fees will have cost more than the £1.5m we got for him? Selling an asset only works if you replace them with someone else younger and cheaper, or ideally from the development squad.

I get this is hindsight, but we should have stuck with Kakay who I thought wasn't as bad as we made out.

He'll be 30 next season. Assuming it's happening it's very QPR to have a bright youngster start and end their career here but not the 24-29 peak years.
0
Furlong on 15:57 - Apr 29 with 1084 viewsNorthernr

Furlong on 15:30 - Apr 29 by TheChef

However we won't have Jimmy Dunne to actually win headers...


Go get the lap top...
1
Furlong on 16:30 - Apr 29 with 866 viewsWilkinswatercarrier

Apparently it had been agreed back in January.

Nothing like announcing the signing of a popular ex player to distract the masses. Just saying........
0
Furlong on 16:35 - Apr 29 with 818 viewsDorse

Furlong on 15:39 - Apr 29 by GaryHaddock

I get that, but it was for £1.5m wasn't it?

Since then we've signed Kane, Ashby, Santos, Cannon, Laird.

Sure all those signing on fees / loan fees will have cost more than the £1.5m we got for him? Selling an asset only works if you replace them with someone else younger and cheaper, or ideally from the development squad.

I get this is hindsight, but we should have stuck with Kakay who I thought wasn't as bad as we made out.

He'll be 30 next season. Assuming it's happening it's very QPR to have a bright youngster start and end their career here but not the 24-29 peak years.


Looking forward to seeing Eze back here in 2030...

'What do we want? We don't know! When do we want it? Now!'

1
Furlong on 16:36 - Apr 29 with 811 viewsLazyFan

I would be astonished if Furlong were to come back to QPR.
Also, if it's due to cutting costs, then why would Marti go from the frying pan into the fire?

Dijksteel is unlikely as well, as Boro still have a slim chance at the playoffs. His contract expires at the end of June, though.

But why would these two want to come to the basket case that is QPR?
Also, they will be on way more money than we would pay them so, that does not make sense either.

Then, in the rumour, it claims Millwall also want Dijksteel.
But Millwall have two decent RB's in Crama and McNamara (who we tried to buy off them once) so, why would they want another? Even Paul Hart would only play mutltple LB's at the same time and not RB's!

I think this is clickbait.

zzzzzzzzzz

0
Furlong on 16:48 - Apr 29 with 749 viewsQPunkR

Furlong on 15:57 - Apr 29 by Northernr

Go get the lap top...


That would result in an indirect free kick

Shit but local

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2025