| The new "WMD" threat 12:16 - Jun 21 with 1245 views | SullutaCreturned |
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c056zqn6vvyo
Is this genuine or is it more fake news to try and gull people into hating Iran and to justify a war?
The Ayatillah's do themselves no favours and are in most of the Wests bad books anyway but if this were true then will we see yet another gulf war? Will the USA be asking it's allies to send troops too?
After the Bush and Blair flockwittery, does anybody want another one? Look at what that caused. |  | | |  |
| The new "WMD" threat on 12:55 - Jun 21 with 1182 views | mangohilljack |
I sincerely hope and pray we’re not heading down that road again.
One of the most worrying prospects, at least from my perspective, is the potential for another false flag event. We've seen it before, and given the current global climate, the odds of witnessing another seem disturbingly high.
Reports suggest Iran is only weeks — maybe even days — away from having the capability to produce a nuclear weapon, pending the Ayatollah’s final approval. At the same time, Donald Trump has reportedly given a two-week deadline to decide whether the U.S. will become involved in a possible conflict with Iran.
Looking at the current geopolitical landscape, I see no signs of meaningful diplomatic resolutions emerging. If anything, tensions are escalating, and fast.
Israel is taking heavy missile strikes, and it's no secret they’re desperate for the U.S. to step in and tip the scales in their favour.
And here’s a chilling thought: what if an attack — possibly even nuclear — were to occur on U.S. soil? Say, in a city like Los Angeles? And what if that attack were orchestrated by Mossad, only to be blamed on Iran? We all know what the response would be — and how swiftly it would escalate.
Yes, this is speculation. But if history has taught us anything, it's that wars often begin with incidents that seem unthinkable until they happen. False flags and manipulated narratives have paved the way before — it’s not beyond the realm of possibility that we’re being steered toward the same outcome once again.
Watch this space. | | | |
| The new "WMD" threat on 15:50 - Jun 21 with 1143 views | SullutaCreturned |
| The new "WMD" threat on 12:55 - Jun 21 by mangohilljack |
I sincerely hope and pray we’re not heading down that road again.
One of the most worrying prospects, at least from my perspective, is the potential for another false flag event. We've seen it before, and given the current global climate, the odds of witnessing another seem disturbingly high.
Reports suggest Iran is only weeks — maybe even days — away from having the capability to produce a nuclear weapon, pending the Ayatollah’s final approval. At the same time, Donald Trump has reportedly given a two-week deadline to decide whether the U.S. will become involved in a possible conflict with Iran.
Looking at the current geopolitical landscape, I see no signs of meaningful diplomatic resolutions emerging. If anything, tensions are escalating, and fast.
Israel is taking heavy missile strikes, and it's no secret they’re desperate for the U.S. to step in and tip the scales in their favour.
And here’s a chilling thought: what if an attack — possibly even nuclear — were to occur on U.S. soil? Say, in a city like Los Angeles? And what if that attack were orchestrated by Mossad, only to be blamed on Iran? We all know what the response would be — and how swiftly it would escalate.
Yes, this is speculation. But if history has taught us anything, it's that wars often begin with incidents that seem unthinkable until they happen. False flags and manipulated narratives have paved the way before — it’s not beyond the realm of possibility that we’re being steered toward the same outcome once again.
Watch this space. |
Israel do a false flag nuclear attack on US soil? They'd have to be insane because if the USa discovered the truth that's the end of their support from the USA and any other western country. They'd be left alone and would soon disappear under the weight of the Islamic countries that surround them.
It wouldn't matter what the truth was though, there'd be people claiming it was false falg even if Iran's leaders went public taking full credit. | | | |
| The new "WMD" threat on 19:07 - Jun 21 with 1086 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| The new "WMD" threat on 15:50 - Jun 21 by SullutaCreturned |
Israel do a false flag nuclear attack on US soil? They'd have to be insane because if the USa discovered the truth that's the end of their support from the USA and any other western country. They'd be left alone and would soon disappear under the weight of the Islamic countries that surround them.
It wouldn't matter what the truth was though, there'd be people claiming it was false falg even if Iran's leaders went public taking full credit. |
Today's satellite surveillance systems can read the newspaper you are reading on the street, I think the Middle East has a lot of tracking of missiles.
Smuggling a nuclear weapon into the States may be more difficult than it sounds! |  |
| |
| The new "WMD" threat on 22:26 - Jun 21 with 1031 views | majorraglan |
Funnily enough someone made the exact same point to me today, the US etc have been saying for the last 15 years they’ll have a weapon in a few weeks etc etc etc. I can remember the Saddam Weapons of Mass Destruction, they didn’t find a great deal to confirm the facts in the dossier.
TBH it’s very hard to know what the truth is because we’ve got a couple of well oiled pr machines spinning their narrative non stop, but one thing for sure is that a lot of innocent people on both sides have been killed. | | | |
| The new "WMD" threat on 01:05 - Jun 22 with 979 views | mangohilljack |
Breaking news: B2 bombers have been involved in attacks on nuclear facilities in Iran | | | |
| The new "WMD" threat on 09:18 - Jun 22 with 929 views | SullutaCreturned |
| The new "WMD" threat on 22:26 - Jun 21 by majorraglan |
Funnily enough someone made the exact same point to me today, the US etc have been saying for the last 15 years they’ll have a weapon in a few weeks etc etc etc. I can remember the Saddam Weapons of Mass Destruction, they didn’t find a great deal to confirm the facts in the dossier.
TBH it’s very hard to know what the truth is because we’ve got a couple of well oiled pr machines spinning their narrative non stop, but one thing for sure is that a lot of innocent people on both sides have been killed. |
It's always the innocent that suffer the most.
The Blair/Bush WMD file, both should have faced criminal charges for what was an illegal war and they both lied to get public support for that war. It only made things worse too. In the end was there any evidence of WMD's at all?
Iran is a rigue state though and even if they don't have nukes, they'll attack by ither means such as funding any lunatic willing to attack the USA or Israel and deny everything. | | | |
| The new "WMD" threat on 00:59 - Jun 23 with 799 views | Robbie |
Maybe we should look at ourselves as a WMD claiming Parliament before throwing stones at other places .
Dr David Kelly for some brushed under the Axminster reason took his own life allegedly for questioning UK involvement in the Iraq War , any public inquest to follow if so I missed it .
Weapons were never found , the apalling Blair and his equally obnoxious misses got away without any serious questioning on his involvement to the call .
Spin will say Sadam Hussein was deposed because of the UK help in that war blah blah .
Tony Blair got off lightly for that call . | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| The new "WMD" threat on 17:36 - Jun 23 with 684 views | SullutaCreturned |
| The new "WMD" threat on 00:59 - Jun 23 by Robbie |
Maybe we should look at ourselves as a WMD claiming Parliament before throwing stones at other places .
Dr David Kelly for some brushed under the Axminster reason took his own life allegedly for questioning UK involvement in the Iraq War , any public inquest to follow if so I missed it .
Weapons were never found , the apalling Blair and his equally obnoxious misses got away without any serious questioning on his involvement to the call .
Spin will say Sadam Hussein was deposed because of the UK help in that war blah blah .
Tony Blair got off lightly for that call . |
Hussein wasn't just deposed, he was killed and in the end who won? I'm certain the West didn't, well maybe some rich people did.
Tony Blair, in my opinion, belongs on trial in the Hague. That he ended up as a middle east peace envoy is surely one of the sickest jokes of all time. | | | |
| The new "WMD" threat on 19:11 - Jun 23 with 647 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| The new "WMD" threat on 17:36 - Jun 23 by SullutaCreturned |
Hussein wasn't just deposed, he was killed and in the end who won? I'm certain the West didn't, well maybe some rich people did.
Tony Blair, in my opinion, belongs on trial in the Hague. That he ended up as a middle east peace envoy is surely one of the sickest jokes of all time. |
The Iraq war claimed an estimated 800,000 lives, incredible. | |
| |
| The new "WMD" threat on 19:32 - Jun 23 with 625 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| The new "WMD" threat on 19:11 - Jun 23 by JACKMANANDBOY |
The Iraq war claimed an estimated 800,000 lives, incredible. |
There were three wars Iraq were involved in during Saddam's time and he started two of them. The fist was probably the bloodiest. American and NATO killed a lot of people but most weird killed by inter faith civil war
The Iran Iraq war mid 1980 s
The Kuwait Iraq war George Bush Snr.
The Iraq NATO war over non existent WMD .
One gas to ask if Saddam had not been removed what would have happened. Large numbers of lives lost for sure
This is a man that gassed 4000 Kurds to death.
The fact that Iran's nuclear establishments are 90m underground means they were always wary of attacks. You do not do that for routine civilian activities. It was to create a bomb.
Iran does not t accept the state of Israel and promised to wipe it out while wiping out Palestinians as well of course.
Ideally Trump would now find a settlement for Palestine to take away reason for friction in the area. Jews and Muslims can live in peace as they do seamlessly in North London.
Iran are Shia and not loved by Sunni Arabia Afghanistan Arabs and Turks. [Post edited 23 Jun 19:34]
|  |
| |
| The new "WMD" threat on 22:27 - Jun 23 with 563 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| The new "WMD" threat on 19:32 - Jun 23 by ReslovenSwan1 |
There were three wars Iraq were involved in during Saddam's time and he started two of them. The fist was probably the bloodiest. American and NATO killed a lot of people but most weird killed by inter faith civil war
The Iran Iraq war mid 1980 s
The Kuwait Iraq war George Bush Snr.
The Iraq NATO war over non existent WMD .
One gas to ask if Saddam had not been removed what would have happened. Large numbers of lives lost for sure
This is a man that gassed 4000 Kurds to death.
The fact that Iran's nuclear establishments are 90m underground means they were always wary of attacks. You do not do that for routine civilian activities. It was to create a bomb.
Iran does not t accept the state of Israel and promised to wipe it out while wiping out Palestinians as well of course.
Ideally Trump would now find a settlement for Palestine to take away reason for friction in the area. Jews and Muslims can live in peace as they do seamlessly in North London.
Iran are Shia and not loved by Sunni Arabia Afghanistan Arabs and Turks. [Post edited 23 Jun 19:34]
|
Yes, and of course in cities like Haifa, Jews and Palestinian Arabs live together. People forget or don't know Palestinian Arabs work as police, judges, MPs and in the IDF. | |
| |
| The new "WMD" threat on 23:19 - Jun 23 with 533 views | theloneranger |
|  |
| Everyday above ground ... Is a good day! 😎 |
| |
| The new "WMD" threat on 12:45 - Jun 24 with 451 views | union_jack |
Something doesn’t add up here. Iran just won’t accept a ceasefire like that. I just believe it’s an excuse to regroup and go again.
Also, Trump doesn’t want peace in reality. He wants a regime change and most would agree with him. Only a matter of time before it starts up again with justification to go a few steps further. |  |
| |
| The new "WMD" threat on 14:05 - Jun 24 with 414 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| The new "WMD" threat on 12:45 - Jun 24 by union_jack |
Something doesn’t add up here. Iran just won’t accept a ceasefire like that. I just believe it’s an excuse to regroup and go again.
Also, Trump doesn’t want peace in reality. He wants a regime change and most would agree with him. Only a matter of time before it starts up again with justification to go a few steps further. |
Trump only has to delay Iran's nuclear programmes a few years then it is someone else's problem. Even if the heart of the project is not severely damaged the loss of logistics chains and management staff will have a serious delaying effect.
Iran is a Shia country supporting other Shia minority groups in other countries like raq and Yemen.Problem occur when the population hits 30-40%. Then civil wars can kick off with agitators.
Pakistan and Afghanistan are largely Sunni. Do not ask me what the difference is but it is apparently important to them. | |
| |
| The new "WMD" threat on 15:23 - Jun 24 with 384 views | SullutaCreturned |
| The new "WMD" threat on 14:05 - Jun 24 by ReslovenSwan1 |
Trump only has to delay Iran's nuclear programmes a few years then it is someone else's problem. Even if the heart of the project is not severely damaged the loss of logistics chains and management staff will have a serious delaying effect.
Iran is a Shia country supporting other Shia minority groups in other countries like raq and Yemen.Problem occur when the population hits 30-40%. Then civil wars can kick off with agitators.
Pakistan and Afghanistan are largely Sunni. Do not ask me what the difference is but it is apparently important to them. |
Logisitics chains and management don't take long to replace, if the heart still beats the rest is fairly easy, specially as they already know whats needed from experiemce.
Sunni and Shia...I suppose it's a tad like Protestant anf Catholic and we know all the trouble that caused in this country.
Iran is a rogue nation but is simply attacking them really the best option, it can't be the only option? | | | |
| The new "WMD" threat on 21:28 - Jun 24 with 296 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| The new "WMD" threat on 15:23 - Jun 24 by SullutaCreturned |
Logisitics chains and management don't take long to replace, if the heart still beats the rest is fairly easy, specially as they already know whats needed from experiemce.
Sunni and Shia...I suppose it's a tad like Protestant anf Catholic and we know all the trouble that caused in this country.
Iran is a rogue nation but is simply attacking them really the best option, it can't be the only option? |
We are talking about nuclear bombs and science. Losing expertise in this field would be extremely challenging i would think. There may no be many volunteers for the top jobs for obvious reasons. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
