Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
QPR grounds its Bluesky account 15:26 - Jul 1 with 4113 viewslarsricchi

QPR FC (@qpr.co.uk) 2025-07-01T12:54:00.757Z


Disappointing. I like Bluesky. To be fair, I pretty much read and post about music there.
8
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 15:33 - Jul 1 with 2964 viewsmikeygunn

Shame, no way I’m going back on X/Twitter. Toxic hellhole.
8
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 15:35 - Jul 1 with 2941 viewsdmm

Very disappointing and I'd say a mistake. I use Bluesky and think there'd be plenty of other Rangers supporters who do too having had enough of X.
1
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 15:36 - Jul 1 with 2929 viewskensalriser

Retrogressive step.

Poll: QPR to finish 7th or Brentford to drop out of the top 6?

0
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 15:39 - Jul 1 with 2922 viewsrobith

Seems a shame, crossposting is hardly difficult
4
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 15:43 - Jul 1 with 2889 viewsBazzaInTheLoft

QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 15:39 - Jul 1 by robith

Seems a shame, crossposting is hardly difficult


Yeah, it’s not a huge consumer of time is it?

Does it cost?

You’d assume it was either a political, personal, or cost issue reason.
0
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 16:02 - Jul 1 with 2776 viewscolinallcars



Never mind….
1
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 16:08 - Jul 1 with 2735 viewsOrthodox_Hoop

Oh no, that's a shame. Life goes on.
1
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 16:13 - Jul 1 with 2704 viewsjoe90

QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 15:43 - Jul 1 by BazzaInTheLoft

Yeah, it’s not a huge consumer of time is it?

Does it cost?

You’d assume it was either a political, personal, or cost issue reason.


At my work we use a platform that links to all social media accounts. So you set up your post/content and it automatically posts across your channels.

No idea why they've come off, even if engagement was low you could still recycle content just to have a presence on the platform?
[Post edited 1 Jul 16:14]
1
Login to get fewer ads

QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 18:42 - Jul 1 with 2326 viewsderbyhoop

Why oh why?
I'm not going back to that toxic cesspit called Twitter.

"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the Earth all one's lifetime." (Mark Twain) Find me on twitter @derbyhoop and now on Bluesky

1
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 18:47 - Jul 1 with 2321 viewsenfieldargh

as a ludite who hates social media Bluesky is the only thingy I've gone onto for rapid QPR info.

Real shame guess I'll have to go back to relying on you lot

captains fantastic
Poll: Jimmy Dunne Will he stay or will he go

1
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 18:49 - Jul 1 with 2315 viewsBeejnewark

Generally comes down to whether the engagement justifies the time/cost of monitoring the account. 481.5K followers on X.
0
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 21:00 - Jul 1 with 2032 viewsGosportHoops

Is bluesky like twitter for vegans and they/them types?
0
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 21:11 - Jul 1 with 1966 viewsderbyhoop

QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 21:00 - Jul 1 by GosportHoops

Is bluesky like twitter for vegans and they/them types?


No. Its for those that don't want americanised fascism dominating social.media.

"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the Earth all one's lifetime." (Mark Twain) Find me on twitter @derbyhoop and now on Bluesky

8
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:02 - Jul 1 with 1822 viewslarsricchi

QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 21:00 - Jul 1 by GosportHoops

Is bluesky like twitter for vegans and they/them types?


Not exclusively

I’m neither, for example
0
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:18 - Jul 1 with 1741 viewsTK1

QPR has 1700 followers on Bluesky and QPR has 481500 followers on X.

There's zero engagement on Bluesky, it's pointless for organisations like QPR. Bluesky will reduce down to its very core as a liberal, artsy social media club - and absolutely nothing with that. But not great for sporting institutions used to communicating with half a million followers and trying to grow its reach.
2
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:26 - Jul 1 with 1693 viewsOldPedro

QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:18 - Jul 1 by TK1

QPR has 1700 followers on Bluesky and QPR has 481500 followers on X.

There's zero engagement on Bluesky, it's pointless for organisations like QPR. Bluesky will reduce down to its very core as a liberal, artsy social media club - and absolutely nothing with that. But not great for sporting institutions used to communicating with half a million followers and trying to grow its reach.


Thing is, QPR have never really posted to Blue sky, so no surprise they didn't get many followers

Extra mature cheddar......a simple cheese for a simple man

0
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:29 - Jul 1 with 1663 viewsBazzaInTheLoft

QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:18 - Jul 1 by TK1

QPR has 1700 followers on Bluesky and QPR has 481500 followers on X.

There's zero engagement on Bluesky, it's pointless for organisations like QPR. Bluesky will reduce down to its very core as a liberal, artsy social media club - and absolutely nothing with that. But not great for sporting institutions used to communicating with half a million followers and trying to grow its reach.


I wonder how many of those 1700 solely use Bluesky though.

It’s also growing rapidly. As others have said, it’s hardly a ballache to keep updated and you can do it at the same time as X and all the rest of it.

Maybe they find the low number embarrassing.

As with everything QPR nowadays, some more info would be nice.
4
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:36 - Jul 1 with 1638 viewsGus_iom

QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:29 - Jul 1 by BazzaInTheLoft

I wonder how many of those 1700 solely use Bluesky though.

It’s also growing rapidly. As others have said, it’s hardly a ballache to keep updated and you can do it at the same time as X and all the rest of it.

Maybe they find the low number embarrassing.

As with everything QPR nowadays, some more info would be nice.


It's all there, on twitter 😆😆😆

Poll: Do we need another Eze thread

1
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:50 - Jul 1 with 1593 viewsHammersmithR

Makes sense. Most of the world use X.
1
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:54 - Jul 1 with 1568 viewshamptonhillhoop

I joined blue-sky about eight months ago when everyone was migrating from x. Have to say, not looked at it for months. Not really much going on there.
[Post edited 2 Jul 9:29]
0
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:56 - Jul 1 with 1563 viewsPlanetHonneywood

Just so we're clear: we're not talking about the 1977 hit by ELO?

Asking for a friend.

'Always In Motion' by John Honney available on amazon.co.uk
Poll: Who should do the Birmingham Frederick?

1
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 23:04 - Jul 1 with 1530 viewsTK1

QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:29 - Jul 1 by BazzaInTheLoft

I wonder how many of those 1700 solely use Bluesky though.

It’s also growing rapidly. As others have said, it’s hardly a ballache to keep updated and you can do it at the same time as X and all the rest of it.

Maybe they find the low number embarrassing.

As with everything QPR nowadays, some more info would be nice.


Have a look for some other official clubs on Bluesky. It is totally and utterly moribund. It may be growing for left of centre media and arts, but it is not a sports social media app and it is dead in terms of UK football.

Palace: 4500 followers, last posted 5 months ago.
Fulham: never posted
Chelsea: 14k, last posted two weeks ago. (they have 26 million followers on X)
No official Arsenal account
Spurs: 30 k followers, not posted in 13 days (8 million on X)
Liverpool haven't posted in four months...

Championship official accounts.. Barely exist. Millwall 600 followers, not posted in six months is pretty indicative.

I'd say QPR posting that it's closing down is actually a very good bit of commnunication in this Bluesky context.
2
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 04:26 - Jul 2 with 1314 viewsBazzaInTheLoft

QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 23:04 - Jul 1 by TK1

Have a look for some other official clubs on Bluesky. It is totally and utterly moribund. It may be growing for left of centre media and arts, but it is not a sports social media app and it is dead in terms of UK football.

Palace: 4500 followers, last posted 5 months ago.
Fulham: never posted
Chelsea: 14k, last posted two weeks ago. (they have 26 million followers on X)
No official Arsenal account
Spurs: 30 k followers, not posted in 13 days (8 million on X)
Liverpool haven't posted in four months...

Championship official accounts.. Barely exist. Millwall 600 followers, not posted in six months is pretty indicative.

I'd say QPR posting that it's closing down is actually a very good bit of commnunication in this Bluesky context.


This is how Twitter started though. It was a open media paradise. That’s why he brought it, because it threatened his interests.

I don’t think it will, because the social media age is slowly dying, but if it takes off are they going to crawl back to it?

Overall not really a big issue unless you are in that 1700 number that use it because it’s less toxic.
0
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 06:26 - Jul 2 with 1221 viewsWokingR

QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 22:56 - Jul 1 by PlanetHonneywood

Just so we're clear: we're not talking about the 1977 hit by ELO?

Asking for a friend.


Yep, I’ve never heard of it either.
But then you wouldn’t catch me on twitter or any other social media too.
0
QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 08:21 - Jul 2 with 1053 viewsPlanetHonneywood

QPR grounds its Bluesky account on 06:26 - Jul 2 by WokingR

Yep, I’ve never heard of it either.
But then you wouldn’t catch me on twitter or any other social media too.


Me too! This site is my one and only dalliance with 'social media'.

I look at these tech bigwigs like Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Whittingham et al and ask a simple question: Would I have a beer with them? If the answer is no because they're a twunt, then voila!

To be honest, I think you, me and others like us who avoid 'anti-social media' are better off for it!

'Always In Motion' by John Honney available on amazon.co.uk
Poll: Who should do the Birmingham Frederick?

6
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© FansNetwork 2025