Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Religion and the far right 14:47 - Jul 28 with 6136 viewssaint901

Our news threads are filled with the usual summer madness in the UK of young, lagered up men being told a lie, choosing to believe it and subsequently throwing insults and eventually bricks and worse at anybody who doesn't look like them.

The far right is becoming more mainstream and we se them weaponising fear and making claims that our country (of 70 million) is being "invaded" by a few thousand people arriving here illegally. (If a poor person arrives this way, he/she is illegal. If a rich person arrives and takes years to "clarify" their status, he/she is an "investor". )

More recently I've seen more posts linking being a "christian" to being a "patriot" and that "christians" have a duty - almost a religious duty - to be passing the bricks to those stupid enough to believe the sort of racist and xenophobic nonsense being spouted.

I am not a religious person. I have no issues with those who chose to believe, but I don't. I do however see this linking of the christian culture with what might loosely be called a doctrine in which Caucasian people are seen as in some manner superior to other races or entitled to something just because of accident of birth, as troubling.

I get that this is straight out of the right wing playbook, i.e. create a sense of jeopardy in certain groups to bring them alongside, but from what I understand of christian philosophy, its about tolerance, love they neighbour, turn the other cheek, be a good Samaritan. It's not about hate other people who have less than we do or choose a different set of rules to live by.

(For what it's worth my understanding of other religions is that they have similar ideas but we know that some will chose to interpret the rules in very different ways).
0
Religion and the far right on 18:32 - Aug 7 with 552 viewsJellybaby

Religion and the far right on 18:45 - Aug 6 by Butty101

Yeah that matches my experience in the Southampton General. Nothing wrong with bringing skilled people in who want to be part of the community.
As far for religion, i would question anyone’s mental health that believes in one of The imaginary gods out there.


But Butty, do you believe in the imaginary big bang theory, that was first mooted less than 100 years ago? If the answer is yes, I won't question your mental health, as that would be, er crazy, but I would suggest you've been sold a pup!

I wholly disapprove of what you say and will defend to the death your right to say it.

0
Religion and the far right on 18:33 - Aug 7 with 552 viewsJellybaby

Religion and the far right on 17:35 - Aug 7 by GasGiant

I see. So when I checked your data (which you obviously didn't) I see that NHS staff totals rose by 38,000 in the year to March 2025, whereas immigration to the Uk stood at 690,000. So where, pray are the other 652,000 going to work, or are they just there to become the NHS customers that actually require an additional 38,000 staff to service, in some nightmare version of Stalinist job creation? Perhaps we need 652,000 additional Deliveroo drivers, unless you can think of something else for them to do?


Gas giant, you're on fire big time!

I wholly disapprove of what you say and will defend to the death your right to say it.

0
Religion and the far right on 15:50 - Aug 8 with 412 viewskentsouthampton

Religion and the far right on 17:35 - Aug 7 by GasGiant

I see. So when I checked your data (which you obviously didn't) I see that NHS staff totals rose by 38,000 in the year to March 2025, whereas immigration to the Uk stood at 690,000. So where, pray are the other 652,000 going to work, or are they just there to become the NHS customers that actually require an additional 38,000 staff to service, in some nightmare version of Stalinist job creation? Perhaps we need 652,000 additional Deliveroo drivers, unless you can think of something else for them to do?


Totally missing the point, which is without immigration and migrants the health service would collapse, I made no other point, You've clearly never had the misfortune to spend much time in hospital.
The truth of the matter is we could end immigration tomorrow as long as you and others like you are happy work to longer and to retire later (state pension) and pay more tax and accept poorer public services. because heaven forbid we tax the wealthy any more than we currently do, they might starve.
0
Religion and the far right on 17:38 - Aug 8 with 370 viewskingolaf

Religion and the far right on 15:50 - Aug 8 by kentsouthampton

Totally missing the point, which is without immigration and migrants the health service would collapse, I made no other point, You've clearly never had the misfortune to spend much time in hospital.
The truth of the matter is we could end immigration tomorrow as long as you and others like you are happy work to longer and to retire later (state pension) and pay more tax and accept poorer public services. because heaven forbid we tax the wealthy any more than we currently do, they might starve.


I don’t think anyone is saying no immigrants.

Just not the ones who come here illegally.

We have totally lost control of our borders and are putting our own people at risk.

We need a policy of controlled immigration. We also need to skill up our workforce to plug skill shortages.
1
Religion and the far right on 18:56 - Aug 8 with 353 viewsGasGiant

Religion and the far right on 15:50 - Aug 8 by kentsouthampton

Totally missing the point, which is without immigration and migrants the health service would collapse, I made no other point, You've clearly never had the misfortune to spend much time in hospital.
The truth of the matter is we could end immigration tomorrow as long as you and others like you are happy work to longer and to retire later (state pension) and pay more tax and accept poorer public services. because heaven forbid we tax the wealthy any more than we currently do, they might starve.


It can't be that clear if you are that wrong can it. As others have said, I pointed out that a figure of nearly 700, 000 is unsustainable. If we had net immigration of around 100,000 based on a previously offered position whether in education, health, IT or wherever (as Australia does) then we would have a stable and prosperous growing economy, not a huge offshore refugee camp with no jobs, no income, no tax contribution..... . Labour could remediate this by removing the right for dependents to immigrate on the back of a sole job offer, by repatriating failed asylum seekers, by tightening up loopholes such as bogus colleges offering bogus courses, properly scrutinising bogus tourist visas......... THey could improve the fiscal situation if they removed the triple lock on pensions. If they stopped caving in and abandoning policies that work, such as the recent WEfare Bill, now a watered down waste of time. The Winter Fuel Allowance Fiasco....
And your Corbynist notion of "taxing the rich" is puerile rubbish. The top 10% taxpayers pay 60% of the income tax revenue already,not to mention many other taxes, and they are leaving the UK in droves. So who is going to pay that shortfall instead? Yes the not so rich, so great solution - You;ve just plled more tax on the average wage earners by trying to strangle another group who already pay far more than the lower earners anyway. If there's any greed around it comes from those who think they can avoid paying any share of the defecit by just trying to dump the entire liability onto another group. Austerity should not be a dirty word. It's a bloody necessity already.
0
Religion and the far right on 23:24 - Aug 8 with 294 viewskentsouthampton

Religion and the far right on 18:56 - Aug 8 by GasGiant

It can't be that clear if you are that wrong can it. As others have said, I pointed out that a figure of nearly 700, 000 is unsustainable. If we had net immigration of around 100,000 based on a previously offered position whether in education, health, IT or wherever (as Australia does) then we would have a stable and prosperous growing economy, not a huge offshore refugee camp with no jobs, no income, no tax contribution..... . Labour could remediate this by removing the right for dependents to immigrate on the back of a sole job offer, by repatriating failed asylum seekers, by tightening up loopholes such as bogus colleges offering bogus courses, properly scrutinising bogus tourist visas......... THey could improve the fiscal situation if they removed the triple lock on pensions. If they stopped caving in and abandoning policies that work, such as the recent WEfare Bill, now a watered down waste of time. The Winter Fuel Allowance Fiasco....
And your Corbynist notion of "taxing the rich" is puerile rubbish. The top 10% taxpayers pay 60% of the income tax revenue already,not to mention many other taxes, and they are leaving the UK in droves. So who is going to pay that shortfall instead? Yes the not so rich, so great solution - You;ve just plled more tax on the average wage earners by trying to strangle another group who already pay far more than the lower earners anyway. If there's any greed around it comes from those who think they can avoid paying any share of the defecit by just trying to dump the entire liability onto another group. Austerity should not be a dirty word. It's a bloody necessity already.


Wibble.
0
Religion and the far right on 23:43 - Aug 8 with 286 viewsChesham_Saint

Religion and the far right on 15:50 - Aug 8 by kentsouthampton

Totally missing the point, which is without immigration and migrants the health service would collapse, I made no other point, You've clearly never had the misfortune to spend much time in hospital.
The truth of the matter is we could end immigration tomorrow as long as you and others like you are happy work to longer and to retire later (state pension) and pay more tax and accept poorer public services. because heaven forbid we tax the wealthy any more than we currently do, they might starve.


How will this “tax the wealthy” work in practice then?

Poll: Which manager would you prefer Saints to have?

0
Religion and the far right on 23:54 - Aug 8 with 276 views1885_SFC

Religion and the far right on 23:43 - Aug 8 by Chesham_Saint

How will this “tax the wealthy” work in practice then?


We tax the wealthy... which won't raise enough so then we tax the already struggling ordinary man in the street who's just trying to keep his head above water... and then we give it all to the gimigrants.

Politics according to kentsouthampton.

Old Skool is Cool

0
Login to get fewer ads

Religion and the far right on 06:11 - Aug 9 with 233 viewskingolaf

Religion and the far right on 23:54 - Aug 8 by 1885_SFC

We tax the wealthy... which won't raise enough so then we tax the already struggling ordinary man in the street who's just trying to keep his head above water... and then we give it all to the gimigrants.

Politics according to kentsouthampton.


You don’t grow an economy by increasing the tax burden.

A wealth tax would just destroy wealth in the UK. We all pay enough tax as it is.
0
Religion and the far right on 08:06 - Aug 9 with 200 viewsSalisburySaint

Religion and the far right on 06:11 - Aug 9 by kingolaf

You don’t grow an economy by increasing the tax burden.

A wealth tax would just destroy wealth in the UK. We all pay enough tax as it is.


Most of us do pay enough tax, but not the super rich who through tax loopholes, off shore accounts etc avoid playing their fair share.

If they paid in line with the rest of us, we wouldn’t be in half the trouble we are in.

And the argument that wealth trickles down the rest of us is a fallacy, the majority just hoard it away for themselves. Only the likes of Bill Gates in the US have a social conscience.
0
Religion and the far right on 09:14 - Aug 9 with 170 viewskentsouthampton

Religion and the far right on 06:11 - Aug 9 by kingolaf

You don’t grow an economy by increasing the tax burden.

A wealth tax would just destroy wealth in the UK. We all pay enough tax as it is.


The nation’s getting older meaning more people are expecting a state pension whilst at the same time the birth rate is declining meaning less people to work and pay the taxes for that pension. One of the answers is immigration - getting people in to work and pay those taxes we’re short of for pensions (amongst other things taxes pay for). No immigration probably means retirement age goes up, state pension eligibility age goes up and you have to work for longer before you get your pension. Which I’d imagine would suit the far right parties. Work until you die and get nothing for it
0
Religion and the far right on 09:33 - Aug 9 with 146 viewsChesham_Saint

Religion and the far right on 08:06 - Aug 9 by SalisburySaint

Most of us do pay enough tax, but not the super rich who through tax loopholes, off shore accounts etc avoid playing their fair share.

If they paid in line with the rest of us, we wouldn’t be in half the trouble we are in.

And the argument that wealth trickles down the rest of us is a fallacy, the majority just hoard it away for themselves. Only the likes of Bill Gates in the US have a social conscience.


Can you define “super rich” please

Poll: Which manager would you prefer Saints to have?

0
Religion and the far right on 09:37 - Aug 9 with 138 viewsChesham_Saint

Religion and the far right on 09:33 - Aug 9 by Chesham_Saint

Can you define “super rich” please


Also the idea that only Bill Gates does anything philanthropic is incorrect in my experience.

Poll: Which manager would you prefer Saints to have?

0
Religion and the far right on 09:57 - Aug 9 with 121 viewsmushinexile

Religion and the far right on 09:37 - Aug 9 by Chesham_Saint

Also the idea that only Bill Gates does anything philanthropic is incorrect in my experience.


Quite so. Dolly Parton is an example, having bought many books to improve literacy across the board. I forget how many millions but I understand that it is a considerable sum.

Poll: Should the BBC show Glastonbury or Wimbledon?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© FansNetwork 2025