| Kone v Kelman 19:41 - Aug 30 with 2729 views | Wilkinswatercarrier |
I think that one has been put to bed.
Though I did fear the worst when Kelman came on at 1-1. Come on, you all did!
|  |
| |  |
| Kone v Kelman on 19:48 - Aug 30 with 2661 views | nomar |
Kone by miles. | | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 20:16 - Aug 30 with 2493 views | OakR |
It's still early days but...effectively swapping Kelman on a one year contract for Kone on a long-term contract is looking like a great deal. | |
| |
| Kone v Kelman on 20:23 - Aug 30 with 2455 views | nix |
| Kone v Kelman on 20:16 - Aug 30 by OakR |
It's still early days but...effectively swapping Kelman on a one year contract for Kone on a long-term contract is looking like a great deal. |
One of the Charlton fans on the way out: Any chance of us getting a refund on Kellman? |  | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 20:32 - Aug 30 with 2380 views | vanrrrr |
Good natutred banter today i thought. Fair play to Kelman he was trying not to laugh when getting serenaded by the loft when he was in a defensive wall down that end.
As for if he is any good ?.. will be hard in that charlton team, do not have the quality to create much. Good reminder there is a so much drek in this league. [Post edited 30 Aug 21:24]
| | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 21:22 - Aug 30 with 2137 views | FDC |
Charlton mate messaged me after the game saying "you definitely got the better league 1 striker". Early days and Kelman could still have a good season, but he isn't going to suddenly match Kone's physicality that's for sure. |  | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 21:26 - Aug 30 with 2104 views | EuroRanger |
On the transfer fees I think we basically got Kone AND Burrell for the cost of a Kelman.
On today's evidence there's no contest. | | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 21:33 - Aug 30 with 2046 views | Padulas_Shampoo |
I don’t want to get too excited too soon or heap pressure on the lad but after many, many, many false dawns Kone looks like the real deal to me from the early signs. Whisper it quietly but have we finally got an effing striker? |  | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 21:43 - Aug 30 with 1971 views | Landshark |
| Kone v Kelman on 20:23 - Aug 30 by nix |
One of the Charlton fans on the way out: Any chance of us getting a refund on Kellman? |
The way some Charlton fans acted after Macauley Bonne was sold to us, no, no your can't have a refund. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Kone v Kelman on 21:45 - Aug 30 with 1958 views | CiderwithRsie |
| Kone v Kelman on 21:22 - Aug 30 by FDC |
Charlton mate messaged me after the game saying "you definitely got the better league 1 striker". Early days and Kelman could still have a good season, but he isn't going to suddenly match Kone's physicality that's for sure. |
That's a good observation.
This is hypothetical, but Kelman might do better in a stronger side than Charlton, which made more chances for him to put away.
But if you're playing up front for a side like QPR or Charlton, you need a bit of that physicality (or maybe Burrell's pace) to make chances for yourself. | | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 08:25 - Aug 31 with 1493 views | stevec |
Think Kelman had been here since 2020 and I’d never witnessed a single minute where I thought he might make it as a Championship striker yet, as a supporter and after his success at Orient, there’s always that nagging doubt to hang in there.
Fair play to Nourry for biting the bullet and getting 3 mill for him and then spending a fraction of it on Kone. |  | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 09:13 - Aug 31 with 1285 views | dmm |
| Kone v Kelman on 08:25 - Aug 31 by stevec |
Think Kelman had been here since 2020 and I’d never witnessed a single minute where I thought he might make it as a Championship striker yet, as a supporter and after his success at Orient, there’s always that nagging doubt to hang in there.
Fair play to Nourry for biting the bullet and getting 3 mill for him and then spending a fraction of it on Kone. |
If the published transfer fees and add ons for Kelman and Kone are correct, they are identical at £5m each. The sell on clauses in their contracts are 20% and 22.5% respectively. |  | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 09:22 - Aug 31 with 1209 views | Esox_Lucius |
I think Kelman was sold to avoid having a Kolli, Kone, Kelman strike force. |  |
| The grass is always greener. |
| |
| Kone v Kelman on 09:23 - Aug 31 with 1204 views | Burnleyhoop |
| Kone v Kelman on 21:33 - Aug 30 by Padulas_Shampoo |
I don’t want to get too excited too soon or heap pressure on the lad but after many, many, many false dawns Kone looks like the real deal to me from the early signs. Whisper it quietly but have we finally got an effing striker? |
Go on PS, it’s ok to get a bit excited, it does wonders for one’s mood. Just don’t admit it to anyone 😉 | | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 12:04 - Aug 31 with 951 views | LazyFan |
Different type of players.
But in the Champ most teams need a number 9. We dont have prem midfielders and wingers so, we need a number 9.
We have Frey but hes always injured and now we have Kone. Kelmen would be no good to us as hes cannot play that role and now Charlton are seeing it to, play Leaburn instead of him.
We really rinsed them on that one. We have sold Dykes, Armstrong and Kelmen and brought in Celar, Kone and Burrel to replace them. Two out of three ain't bad. And we might even replace Celar next season. |  |
| |
| Kone v Kelman on 12:15 - Aug 31 with 901 views | kensalriser |
| Kone v Kelman on 09:13 - Aug 31 by dmm |
If the published transfer fees and add ons for Kelman and Kone are correct, they are identical at £5m each. The sell on clauses in their contracts are 20% and 22.5% respectively. |
Published where? Surely these are estimated rather than actual. |  |
| |
| Kone v Kelman on 13:55 - Aug 31 with 757 views | dmm |
| Kone v Kelman on 12:15 - Aug 31 by kensalriser |
Published where? Surely these are estimated rather than actual. |
I can't remember where I picked them up. Could have been WLS, BBC, X, clickbait or newspaper sites. But I do remember there were numerous sources reporting similar figures so think they should be there or thereabouts. | | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 14:04 - Aug 31 with 698 views | NorthantsHoop |
Pleased we let Kelman go, as Kone is a real upgrade, physical and can play. We could well have a diamond in Mr Kone. I also like Burrell he is fast and a good presser. Think him and Mr Kone are going to cause defences a lot of problems this season. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
