| Kone v Kelman on 15:30 - Sep 29 with 2573 views | sparkey |
Selling Kelman and getting Kone for a similar fee is astonishingly good business & I still can't wrap my head around how it is possible. |  | |  |
| Kone v Kelman on 18:34 - Sep 29 with 2260 views | PlanetHonneywood |
| Kone v Kelman on 15:30 - Sep 29 by sparkey |
Selling Kelman and getting Kone for a similar fee is astonishingly good business & I still can't wrap my head around how it is possible. |
True. I guess the project gets what the project wants.
The project will set us free. |  |
| |
| Kone v Kelman on 18:53 - Sep 29 with 2187 views | CiderwithRsie |
| Kone v Kelman on 18:34 - Sep 29 by PlanetHonneywood |
True. I guess the project gets what the project wants.
The project will set us free. |
The project gets what the project wants
But I want nothing this society's got
I'm going to White City underground. | | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 18:58 - Sep 29 with 2162 views | daveB |
I think Kelman alongside Kone would have been good to see but from what I've seen of Charlton they have created nothing for him and he's the type of striker who needs service, shame for him it's not working out so far. |  | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 22:10 - Sep 29 with 1724 views | 1JD |
| Kone v Kelman on 15:30 - Sep 29 by sparkey |
Selling Kelman and getting Kone for a similar fee is astonishingly good business & I still can't wrap my head around how it is possible. |
It’s possible because anyone who scores 21 goals in a calendar season, in league 1, the division below, and 27 goals all in, aged 23 and under is hot property.
That’s how the market works. He would also of been worth even more had he not been in the last year of his deal. How you use this type of striker, and get the best out of him, is another topic entirely.
As for Kone, he scored less goals, with a lot more penalties, is a different type of striker and was a year younger. Also had only 1 year left on his deal.
Swings and roundabouts.
[Post edited 29 Sep 22:14]
| | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 01:52 - Sep 30 with 1429 views | SydneyRs |
My Charlton mate reckons Nathan Jones continues to play Kelman as a loan striker to justify the spend on him, but it doesn't suit him. Reckons they might loan Kelman out.
Despite him not scoring Charlton have started the season pretty well and have the same points as us. | | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 05:27 - Sep 30 with 1270 views | FDC |
| Kone v Kelman on 01:52 - Sep 30 by SydneyRs |
My Charlton mate reckons Nathan Jones continues to play Kelman as a loan striker to justify the spend on him, but it doesn't suit him. Reckons they might loan Kelman out.
Despite him not scoring Charlton have started the season pretty well and have the same points as us. |
Yeah my Charlton mate said similar, and that most supporters can't understand why they signed him when he doesn't fit their team or way of playing, which is all very familiar.
Feel a bit sorry for Kelman to be honest, not really the opportunity he would have hoped for. |  | | |
| Kone v Kelman on 06:26 - Sep 30 with 1195 views | cpgerber |
I’m guessing we haven’t moved the needle yet on any of the “added bonusses” that went with the Kelman sale.
Pity for the lad and I wonder why he was so hell bent on leaving (if rumours are true). |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
