Refwatch - Forest Green Rovers v Rochdale on 21:34 - Oct 8 with 297 views | EllGazzell |
Refwatch - Forest Green Rovers v Rochdale on 13:04 - Oct 8 by ChaffRAFC | Mods? It's one mod. I do it alone. Gone on holiday? Chance would be a fine thing but I do have a full time job and an extra job in the evenings as well as moderate this forum, and post stories on the website. https://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/rochdale/forum/260030/terms-and-condition The terms and conditions on the link above, whether you like them or not, says not to be outing people, not name call and that posts are to be written fairly and without malice. Regarding our former chief executive, facts in the public domain don't get deleted. Allegations that can't be backed up with clear proof do. Unless someone wants to contribute for me against legal action, of which I've been threatened numerous times, then I'll continue moderating as I have. I'm deleting posts on here that clearly violate the terms and conditions above and users are more than welcome to use the ignore button on users they don't want to see posts from. Other people have managed to post on this thread and ignore the personal stuff. Some seemingly can't. When rules are broken, action will be taken. |
Eyup Chaff lad, this board, including its previous incarnation, has been around since year dot.com (I've been clocking on for 25ish years), and I for one am grateful for your hard work in keeping it going, mate. Catch you soon, pal. |  |
|  |
Refwatch - Forest Green Rovers v Rochdale on 21:50 - Oct 8 with 261 views | TalkingSutty |
Refwatch - Forest Green Rovers v Rochdale on 13:04 - Oct 8 by ChaffRAFC | Mods? It's one mod. I do it alone. Gone on holiday? Chance would be a fine thing but I do have a full time job and an extra job in the evenings as well as moderate this forum, and post stories on the website. https://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/rochdale/forum/260030/terms-and-condition The terms and conditions on the link above, whether you like them or not, says not to be outing people, not name call and that posts are to be written fairly and without malice. Regarding our former chief executive, facts in the public domain don't get deleted. Allegations that can't be backed up with clear proof do. Unless someone wants to contribute for me against legal action, of which I've been threatened numerous times, then I'll continue moderating as I have. I'm deleting posts on here that clearly violate the terms and conditions above and users are more than welcome to use the ignore button on users they don't want to see posts from. Other people have managed to post on this thread and ignore the personal stuff. Some seemingly can't. When rules are broken, action will be taken. |
You do a very good job and it's been extremely difficult over the years. Thanks for your efforts. [Post edited 8 Oct 21:51]
|  | |  |
| |