| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 11:16 - Oct 14 with 896 views | saintwizzler |
Will Still is a good coach?
He needs to get some results on the pitch then PDQ.
Lallana is circling in the wings to step in.
Nothing but a win on Saturday will suffice Mr Will. [Post edited 14 Oct 11:18]
|  |
| We thought that we had the answers,
It was the questions we had wrong. |
|  |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 11:21 - Oct 14 with 878 views | DorsetIan |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 11:16 - Oct 14 by saintwizzler |
Will Still is a good coach?
He needs to get some results on the pitch then PDQ.
Lallana is circling in the wings to step in.
Nothing but a win on Saturday will suffice Mr Will. [Post edited 14 Oct 11:18]
|
Game's got draw written all over it. |  |
| |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 11:33 - Oct 14 with 850 views | saintwizzler |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 11:21 - Oct 14 by DorsetIan |
Game's got draw written all over it. |
Will Still will still take positives out of that. | |
| We thought that we had the answers,
It was the questions we had wrong. |
| |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 11:34 - Oct 14 with 850 views | PatfromPoole |
This story baffles me.
Jelert looked really good at Anfield.
Certainly a big upgrade on Roerslev, who looks a big waste of about £5 million.
We would have been better off keeping Bree and spending the £5 million on a striker.
QPR are a poor side, but are above us because they bought Kone from Wycombe. He would have been ideal for us. |  |
| |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 11:59 - Oct 14 with 803 views | 1885_SFC |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 11:34 - Oct 14 by PatfromPoole |
This story baffles me.
Jelert looked really good at Anfield.
Certainly a big upgrade on Roerslev, who looks a big waste of about £5 million.
We would have been better off keeping Bree and spending the £5 million on a striker.
QPR are a poor side, but are above us because they bought Kone from Wycombe. He would have been ideal for us. |
I've been singing Kone's praises for ages - but Sport Republic own us so there was no chance of getting him in.
Terrific youngster with a big future I reckon. Not sure why SR didn't bring him in as he ticks all of their boxes... especially the most important one which reads 'Very healthy sell-on clause'. |  |
| |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 12:23 - Oct 14 with 769 views | SaintNick |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 11:34 - Oct 14 by PatfromPoole |
This story baffles me.
Jelert looked really good at Anfield.
Certainly a big upgrade on Roerslev, who looks a big waste of about £5 million.
We would have been better off keeping Bree and spending the £5 million on a striker.
QPR are a poor side, but are above us because they bought Kone from Wycombe. He would have been ideal for us. |
At Anfield we were playing a load of kids, so not so physical.
What is baffling is why we have signed so many players who arent getting in the team, including Jelert |  |
| Satisfying The Bloodlust Of The Masses In Peacetime |
| |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 12:29 - Oct 14 with 763 views | 1885_SFC |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 12:23 - Oct 14 by SaintNick |
At Anfield we were playing a load of kids, so not so physical.
What is baffling is why we have signed so many players who arent getting in the team, including Jelert |
Probably because those players were signed over the head of Will Still and he had no choice in the matter?
Can't think of any other reason... unless they're not getting along with WS over at Staplewood? | |
| |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 13:01 - Oct 14 with 713 views | PatfromPoole |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 12:23 - Oct 14 by SaintNick |
At Anfield we were playing a load of kids, so not so physical.
What is baffling is why we have signed so many players who arent getting in the team, including Jelert |
He was up against a highly-rated left-winger at Anfield.
Can’t remember his name but he was pretty quick. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 13:03 - Oct 14 with 708 views | PatfromPoole |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 12:23 - Oct 14 by SaintNick |
At Anfield we were playing a load of kids, so not so physical.
What is baffling is why we have signed so many players who arent getting in the team, including Jelert |
To answer your other point, we signed too many players in positions where we didn’t need to.
But not enough players in positions where we did need them.
Bonkers, really. | |
| |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 14:08 - Oct 14 with 639 views | MattFinish |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 11:34 - Oct 14 by PatfromPoole |
This story baffles me.
Jelert looked really good at Anfield.
Certainly a big upgrade on Roerslev, who looks a big waste of about £5 million.
We would have been better off keeping Bree and spending the £5 million on a striker.
QPR are a poor side, but are above us because they bought Kone from Wycombe. He would have been ideal for us. |
Totally agree Pat. Jelert had Liverpool’s future star Ngumoha absolutely in his pocket for 75 minutes until he was subbed off
I heard Jelert came off with an injury. Is that why he hasn’t figured since? |  | | |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 16:44 - Oct 14 with 525 views | grumpy |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 14:08 - Oct 14 by MattFinish |
Totally agree Pat. Jelert had Liverpool’s future star Ngumoha absolutely in his pocket for 75 minutes until he was subbed off
I heard Jelert came off with an injury. Is that why he hasn’t figured since? |
Jelert played for Denmark's U19&21 and the full Denmark's squad 3 times.
He's only 22 and has looked promising.
Why do we mess around like this?
These new signings play 'musical chairs' with selection. |  | | |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 16:55 - Oct 14 with 506 views | MattFinish |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 16:44 - Oct 14 by grumpy |
Jelert played for Denmark's U19&21 and the full Denmark's squad 3 times.
He's only 22 and has looked promising.
Why do we mess around like this?
These new signings play 'musical chairs' with selection. |
For sure Grumps, it’s crazy
I think we bought a lot of players of similar standard with no stand out stars so Still is finding it difficult to see who will earn their place
Out of all the new signings this season including returning loan players I’d say only Charles and Jander have made themselves undroppable | | | |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 16:56 - Oct 14 with 503 views | cocklebreath |
Another waste of money, why loan him if you’re not gonna play him? Every year we get 2 or 3 like this. Moronic club making wrong decisions constantly. Fook off sports republic player trading idiots. |  |
| |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 17:03 - Oct 14 with 486 views | grumpy |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 16:55 - Oct 14 by MattFinish |
For sure Grumps, it’s crazy
I think we bought a lot of players of similar standard with no stand out stars so Still is finding it difficult to see who will earn their place
Out of all the new signings this season including returning loan players I’d say only Charles and Jander have made themselves undroppable |
Hi Matt.
The fans will want to see an improvement after the international break. | | | |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 17:15 - Oct 14 with 473 views | Ifonly |
Again, nonsense to say we have a good squad when we don't have a single fit centre forward.
As for Jelert, on his one appearance when he was given decent time, he played at right back, not left, and he looked our best right back. | | | |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 17:21 - Oct 14 with 452 views | Ron11 |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 12:29 - Oct 14 by 1885_SFC |
Probably because those players were signed over the head of Will Still and he had no choice in the matter?
Can't think of any other reason... unless they're not getting along with WS over at Staplewood? |
I think there's more than a hint of the true situation at Staplewood right there... | | | |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 17:39 - Oct 14 with 430 views | saint22 |
I would say this just shines a light on the bigger issues at our club
This guy looked solid against Liverpool - albeit their second d string he was up against a quality player and dealt with him]
He looked as good if not better than Mads yet now we bin him off
Is he worse than Downs? On what we have seen so far I would say no yet we are done with him already??? | | | |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 18:36 - Oct 14 with 375 views | Ifonly |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 17:39 - Oct 14 by saint22 |
I would say this just shines a light on the bigger issues at our club
This guy looked solid against Liverpool - albeit their second d string he was up against a quality player and dealt with him]
He looked as good if not better than Mads yet now we bin him off
Is he worse than Downs? On what we have seen so far I would say no yet we are done with him already??? |
Indeed. Nick told me that I was writing off Downs too early. But here it seems the club are binning off Jelert after less time and better performance than Downs. So hopefully Nick will be duly critical of the club in his next post  | | | |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 19:35 - Oct 14 with 288 views | kingslandstand1 |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 16:44 - Oct 14 by grumpy |
Jelert played for Denmark's U19&21 and the full Denmark's squad 3 times.
He's only 22 and has looked promising.
Why do we mess around like this?
These new signings play 'musical chairs' with selection. |
Also, possibly more important, it would put future prospective (decent) signings off coming to the club with these clowns in charge |  |
| |
| Will Still Appears To Have Decided Loanee Has No Future At St Mary's on 23:15 - Oct 14 with 108 views | sledger |
weve binned off our best full backs,gellert cant get a sniff and charlie taylor has been given to a rival,i dont understand this club and still is starting to look dead iffy. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
