Three game ban for Austin on the cards 16:41 - Apr 7 with 12300 views | FrankRightguard | If they have bothered to charge him they’ll certainly ban him. | | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 16:43 - Apr 7 with 5410 views | flynnbo | For the "stamp"? | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 16:45 - Apr 7 with 5391 views | FrankRightguard | Seems like it. The brute. | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 16:50 - Apr 7 with 5347 views | OldPedro | I've seen at lot worse go unpunished - can't think of another example this season where some-one has been charged after a match because the ref missed it | |
| Extra mature cheddar......a simple cheese for a simple man |
| |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 16:52 - Apr 7 with 5324 views | W7Ranger | Don't remember seeing this at the time. Who was it on? Was it deliberate/bad? | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:00 - Apr 7 with 5274 views | HAYESBOY | That's ridiculous. Austin is facing the other way and the player is behind him on the floor. He cant see where he is. He catches him but i don't think for a minute its intentional. | |
| Smells like a trout farm in here |
| |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:07 - Apr 7 with 5244 views | daveB | I thought at the time he had got away with one there, they had just had a few words beforehand | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:10 - Apr 7 with 5220 views | Northernr | Silly.
| | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:13 - Apr 7 with 5198 views | PinnerPaul |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 16:50 - Apr 7 by OldPedro | I've seen at lot worse go unpunished - can't think of another example this season where some-one has been charged after a match because the ref missed it |
Not that common but does happen. 1 in Nov, 2 in Dec, 1 in Feb. Depends if he admits the charge or not, if he does, yes it will be a 3 match ban. If not I believe the incident is viewed independently by a panel of 3 and I think its needs a verdict of 2 or 3 to call it VC for the 3 match ban to be handed down. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:13 - Apr 7 with 5190 views | PinnerPaul |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:07 - Apr 7 by daveB | I thought at the time he had got away with one there, they had just had a few words beforehand |
Yep, so did I! | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:14 - Apr 7 with 5181 views | BAWHoops |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:10 - Apr 7 by Northernr | Silly.
|
Naughty naughty from Charlie there | |
| http://blogandwhitehoops.wordpress.com/ |
| |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:14 - Apr 7 with 5178 views | PinnerPaul |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:10 - Apr 7 by Northernr | Silly.
|
Silly to charge him or silly of Austin? | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:15 - Apr 7 with 5175 views | daveB |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:13 - Apr 7 by PinnerPaul | Not that common but does happen. 1 in Nov, 2 in Dec, 1 in Feb. Depends if he admits the charge or not, if he does, yes it will be a 3 match ban. If not I believe the incident is viewed independently by a panel of 3 and I think its needs a verdict of 2 or 3 to call it VC for the 3 match ban to be handed down. |
Do many players win these appeals? Can't see how he gets away with that | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:17 - Apr 7 with 5158 views | Northernr |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:14 - Apr 7 by PinnerPaul | Silly to charge him or silly of Austin? |
Silly of Austin. Though to be punished retrospectively the referee has to admit he's missed it right? And Stroud is looking right at it, clear line of sight, from all of 15 yards away. | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:17 - Apr 7 with 5153 views | PinnerPaul |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:15 - Apr 7 by daveB | Do many players win these appeals? Can't see how he gets away with that |
Well there are not that many, but for this type of offence, no I wouldn't have thought so. Of interest to probably no one but whilst looking at the FA's discipline section, I saw Neil Warnock got a £7,000 fine for his, frankly, ridiculous rant a few weeks back. | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:22 - Apr 7 with 5100 views | BrianMcCarthy | Stupid thing to do. | |
| |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:23 - Apr 7 with 5090 views | stowmarketrange |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:13 - Apr 7 by PinnerPaul | Not that common but does happen. 1 in Nov, 2 in Dec, 1 in Feb. Depends if he admits the charge or not, if he does, yes it will be a 3 match ban. If not I believe the incident is viewed independently by a panel of 3 and I think its needs a verdict of 2 or 3 to call it VC for the 3 match ban to be handed down. |
So he’ll be ok for the playoff final if Remy isn’t. | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:24 - Apr 7 with 5080 views | MickS |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:17 - Apr 7 by PinnerPaul | Well there are not that many, but for this type of offence, no I wouldn't have thought so. Of interest to probably no one but whilst looking at the FA's discipline section, I saw Neil Warnock got a £7,000 fine for his, frankly, ridiculous rant a few weeks back. |
PP. Had Keithy Keith produced a card for that, would it have been a red? [Post edited 7 Apr 2021 17:25]
| | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:27 - Apr 7 with 5051 views | PinnerPaul |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:17 - Apr 7 by Northernr | Silly of Austin. Though to be punished retrospectively the referee has to admit he's missed it right? And Stroud is looking right at it, clear line of sight, from all of 15 yards away. |
Yeeessssssss, bit of a fudge isn't it. Observer will say/write - Did you see this incident? If he says Yes - obvious question is why isn't it VC? If he says no, still marked down, as in theory, at least 1 of the 4 should see everything, but maybe not as much as saying I saw it but didn't think it was VC! At this stage of Mr S's career, doubt it makes that much difference, but I guess self preservation steps in as it would for any of us! | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:28 - Apr 7 with 5043 views | daveB |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:17 - Apr 7 by Northernr | Silly of Austin. Though to be punished retrospectively the referee has to admit he's missed it right? And Stroud is looking right at it, clear line of sight, from all of 15 yards away. |
I think he'd have seen it as accidental at the time, when you see the other angle it looks a lot worse | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:30 - Apr 7 with 5028 views | Northernr |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:28 - Apr 7 by daveB | I think he'd have seen it as accidental at the time, when you see the other angle it looks a lot worse |
My understanding of the rule is if he's seen it and deemed it accidental then they can't act. You can only retrospectively punish something if the referee says he missed it entirely. | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:31 - Apr 7 with 5026 views | PinnerPaul |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:24 - Apr 7 by MickS | PP. Had Keithy Keith produced a card for that, would it have been a red? [Post edited 7 Apr 2021 17:25]
|
Who knows!!!!! Up to ref on the day. However, as Clive says, if he HAD produced a yellow card or even awarded just a fk, that would have been it, because he couldn't say he hadn't seen it. | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:33 - Apr 7 with 5008 views | MickS |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:31 - Apr 7 by PinnerPaul | Who knows!!!!! Up to ref on the day. However, as Clive says, if he HAD produced a yellow card or even awarded just a fk, that would have been it, because he couldn't say he hadn't seen it. |
So Keithy Keith has done us up by being nice. That hurts. | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:34 - Apr 7 with 4999 views | Northernr |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:33 - Apr 7 by MickS | So Keithy Keith has done us up by being nice. That hurts. |
He's done us up by lying. He's seen it and fcked it up. Instead of admitting that, in which case they wouldn't be able to do anything, he's now pretended he hasn't seen it at all, so they can retrospectively ban the player. | | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:37 - Apr 7 with 4960 views | gazza1 | I saw something on the day but didn't think much of it......if they use the video then it will be a verdict of guilty, whatever that gives CA is what will happen, I don't know the rules. Cant see an appeal if they issue a ban. How did this matter raise its head?? [Post edited 7 Apr 2021 17:38]
| | | |
Three game ban for Austin on the cards on 17:41 - Apr 7 with 4926 views | gazza1 | So, if the ref saw it on the day and just gave CA a volley of words at the time = end of the matter but because nothing was mentioned someone has highlighted it.....who is that 'someone'?? | | | |
| |