Sack the manager 17:23 - Oct 4 with 2036 views | kingolaf | He hasn’t got a clue. |  | | |  |
Sack the manager on 11:43 - Oct 5 with 218 views | TripleNiemi |
Sack the manager on 11:37 - Oct 5 by 1ASIN12 | It’s worrying just how many of our fans are accepting of our position of a lower mid table 2 nd division club. Dragan and the loons tell us how difficult it is to be a premier league club, this despite us being a established premier league club when the loons took over and small clubs like Bournemouth , palace and Brighton to name a few putting that myth to bed. The loons tell us how near on impossible it is for a championship club to go up and survive , this dispite both Leeds and Sunderland putting that myth to bed. Fvck me even Burnley are. 1/4 of the way to our points telly last season. Dragan and the loons are crap at running a football club but they’ve done wonders convincing some fans a lower 2nd division place is a good achievement. |
We March On Good job we built St. Mary’s as we never would have survived in such a small capacity ground as the Dell….. |  |
|  |
Sack the manager on 12:07 - Oct 5 with 153 views | benalisbroom | 💯 A number of clubs have been monitoring WS for some time now- he’s only with us because he turned down Sunderland for one. He has a newly-assembled team of 20/21 year olds in what is very definitely a man’s league. He effectively has no CF and btw please can we stop holding him to account for his comment that he was happy with the forwards? I very much doubt that he meant this but he couldn’t really say anything else. This team will get better: get behind them. Lampard getting the credit for years of solid work at Coventry, under awful circumstances, by Robins just shows how short-sighted we can be. There are lots of things wrong with this club, but I am not sure that WS is one of them. |  | |  |
Sack the manager on 13:08 - Oct 5 with 62 views | PatfromPoole |
Sack the manager on 12:07 - Oct 5 by benalisbroom | 💯 A number of clubs have been monitoring WS for some time now- he’s only with us because he turned down Sunderland for one. He has a newly-assembled team of 20/21 year olds in what is very definitely a man’s league. He effectively has no CF and btw please can we stop holding him to account for his comment that he was happy with the forwards? I very much doubt that he meant this but he couldn’t really say anything else. This team will get better: get behind them. Lampard getting the credit for years of solid work at Coventry, under awful circumstances, by Robins just shows how short-sighted we can be. There are lots of things wrong with this club, but I am not sure that WS is one of them. |
Sunderland must be really rueing how things turned out. |  |
|  |
Sack the manager on 13:19 - Oct 5 with 49 views | kingolaf |
Sack the manager on 12:07 - Oct 5 by benalisbroom | 💯 A number of clubs have been monitoring WS for some time now- he’s only with us because he turned down Sunderland for one. He has a newly-assembled team of 20/21 year olds in what is very definitely a man’s league. He effectively has no CF and btw please can we stop holding him to account for his comment that he was happy with the forwards? I very much doubt that he meant this but he couldn’t really say anything else. This team will get better: get behind them. Lampard getting the credit for years of solid work at Coventry, under awful circumstances, by Robins just shows how short-sighted we can be. There are lots of things wrong with this club, but I am not sure that WS is one of them. |
Lampard took over a team that was failing. Robins did a fantastic job there but they were regressing. Lampard almost took them up, and they look the best side in the league now. He also has a bit about him. I don’t think he would have entertained working for the SR clowns though. They wouldn’t have gone for him either as he would see through all the bull. |  | |  |
| |