| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 01:18 - Sep 29 with 234885 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Who will be watching? First one kicks off in 24 hours time.
The Democrats have pulled Joe back from his campaign trail recently to get him prepared, so hopefully it will be a decent exchange.
Unfortunately they don’t seem to have great confidence as they have spent the last month looking for any dirt they can dig up so Joe can use if he gets stuck.
It’s no coincidence that this vote influencing Facebook algorithm story is being shamelessly and inaccurately made into a race issue on the eve of the debates. So transparent and disingenuous, it’s a shame politics has come to this on this level where black people are being used in this way to score political points. I would be furious if I was them, but it does seem a lot of people are not falling for this one and calling it out for what it is.
People finally seem to be getting wise to this political race baiting which is refreshing to see.
It’s also telling that in the week of the debate they try and paint Trump as a tax evasion offender. I think that’s what they wanted the tax returns to show, they seem to have got annoyed when it turns out his tax returns were fine in accordance to what his companies profits were - but decided to run with it anyway. Any news is good news in their mind as it’s another thing Joe can use when in a tricky spot.
But I hope the discussions remain political and doesn’t turn into some form of gossip peddling reality TV episode.
Although I think there should be some kind of drinking game involved if it does turn that way, how many times Biden completely loses his thread of thought and blurts out “I mean, think about it...” you have to take a shot. 
I will be watching with great interest anyway.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| |  |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:18 - Nov 13 with 1128 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 14:07 - Nov 13 by onehunglow |
I keep saying Dr;you are not as right as you think you are. |
I’m on the side of common sense. Always will be, whether that left or right.
Currently the left has lost its collective mind so do not relate with them at all currently. | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:46 - Nov 13 with 1120 views | Groo |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:17 - Nov 13 by Dr_Parnassus |
Odd that there just seems to be the pandemic in Democrat run states and everyone else manages to vote just fine.
Then when it suits then rush into the street.
If it’s safe enough to dance in the street, it’s safe enough to vote properly. |
There's not a pandemic only in Democratic States, your being deliberately obtuse again to make yourself feel good and pretend your superior.
The pandemic is obviously workd wide, including believe it or not all States.
The Democrats advised to use postal votes in EVERY State and large numbers did.
The local rules mean that SOME States can count postal votres early, SOME States cannot.
Of course you know this, just trying to be clever as usual. |  |
| Groo does what Groo does best |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:50 - Nov 13 with 1118 views | Groo |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:15 - Nov 13 by Dr_Parnassus |
Her vote was illegal. Not sure what’s so confusing. |
What we are talking about here is that this womans vote was highlighted as a fraudulant vote by team Trump.
It was not a fraudulant vote, the woman is 94 and made a mistake based on how things were when she was younger.
She was allowed 1 vote.
She made 1 vote.
She referred to herself as Mrs (husbands name) which was common in the older days.
It was not a fraudulant vote, she made a mistake in how she identified herself.
Again you know this, again you can't help yourself in trying to make yourself look clever. | |
| Groo does what Groo does best |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:52 - Nov 13 with 1115 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:46 - Nov 13 by Groo |
There's not a pandemic only in Democratic States, your being deliberately obtuse again to make yourself feel good and pretend your superior.
The pandemic is obviously workd wide, including believe it or not all States.
The Democrats advised to use postal votes in EVERY State and large numbers did.
The local rules mean that SOME States can count postal votres early, SOME States cannot.
Of course you know this, just trying to be clever as usual. |
I’m just stating it how it is.
The advice from experts is that is was fine and safe to vote in person.
Coronavirus has been used as the vehicle to get people voting early and voting democrat. They used a pandemic several times and in several ways to improve their own chances in an election.
2 days after said election and it’s a miracle and everything is fixed again, there are mass gatherings in those Democrat states celebrating.
Now you may be horrifically biased but I don’t believe you are stupid. So you will know this also. | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:55 - Nov 13 with 1111 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:50 - Nov 13 by Groo |
What we are talking about here is that this womans vote was highlighted as a fraudulant vote by team Trump.
It was not a fraudulant vote, the woman is 94 and made a mistake based on how things were when she was younger.
She was allowed 1 vote.
She made 1 vote.
She referred to herself as Mrs (husbands name) which was common in the older days.
It was not a fraudulant vote, she made a mistake in how she identified herself.
Again you know this, again you can't help yourself in trying to make yourself look clever. |
It was fraudulent. She put her husbands name on the ballot who died 14 years prior.
We know of thousands of dead people that have requested and submitted votes. That’s fraudulent too.
They are now trying to determine the impact of that and how many were actually counted. This is a long process.
I’m going to apply for a credit card in my dead aunties name, if they come back and catch me for fraud I’ll say “nah, it was a tribute”. | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:05 - Nov 13 with 1096 views | Groo |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:52 - Nov 13 by Dr_Parnassus |
I’m just stating it how it is.
The advice from experts is that is was fine and safe to vote in person.
Coronavirus has been used as the vehicle to get people voting early and voting democrat. They used a pandemic several times and in several ways to improve their own chances in an election.
2 days after said election and it’s a miracle and everything is fixed again, there are mass gatherings in those Democrat states celebrating.
Now you may be horrifically biased but I don’t believe you are stupid. So you will know this also. |
"Coronavirus has been used as the vehicle to get people voting early and voting democrat."
I don't recall anyone saying vote democrat will make you safe from COVID!
There are stupid people as far as COVID is concerned across all political parties who ignore COVID advice.
Millions of Democrats voted at stations regardless of advice, they decided they felt safe. The Democratic party advised to mail in, therefore a large number of Democrats did this, not all. | |
| Groo does what Groo does best |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:07 - Nov 13 with 1091 views | Groo |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:55 - Nov 13 by Dr_Parnassus |
It was fraudulent. She put her husbands name on the ballot who died 14 years prior.
We know of thousands of dead people that have requested and submitted votes. That’s fraudulent too.
They are now trying to determine the impact of that and how many were actually counted. This is a long process.
I’m going to apply for a credit card in my dead aunties name, if they come back and catch me for fraud I’ll say “nah, it was a tribute”. |
It was not fraudulant, she only made her own vote.
Fraudulant would have been vote once in her name and vote once in her husbands name.
She didn't do that, she did make an error.
Unless you are saying that her husband always went about calling himself Mrs. | |
| Groo does what Groo does best |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:09 - Nov 13 with 1085 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:05 - Nov 13 by Groo |
"Coronavirus has been used as the vehicle to get people voting early and voting democrat."
I don't recall anyone saying vote democrat will make you safe from COVID!
There are stupid people as far as COVID is concerned across all political parties who ignore COVID advice.
Millions of Democrats voted at stations regardless of advice, they decided they felt safe. The Democratic party advised to mail in, therefore a large number of Democrats did this, not all. |
Voting early was a Democrat mantra.
They did this because Biden does not enthuse anyone to get out and vote. Having a long drawn out process where you can cast your vote (even if you didn't ask for one in many cases) at your leisure, backed by a mass media offensive - thats a very large reason to want to push the ''Coronavirus means you have to mail in ballot'' manta.
If it is safe enough to riot and burn down buildings - It is safe enough to vote. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:10 - Nov 13 with 1084 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:07 - Nov 13 by Groo |
It was not fraudulant, she only made her own vote.
Fraudulant would have been vote once in her name and vote once in her husbands name.
She didn't do that, she did make an error.
Unless you are saying that her husband always went about calling himself Mrs. |
It was fraudulent. She voted in someone else's name, a dead person.
What you are saying is, she didn't realise it was fraud.
Which isn't the same thing.... or relevant. | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:23 - Nov 13 with 1071 views | Groo |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:10 - Nov 13 by Dr_Parnassus |
It was fraudulent. She voted in someone else's name, a dead person.
What you are saying is, she didn't realise it was fraud.
Which isn't the same thing.... or relevant. |
She voted her vote, she used a method of identifying herself that was common when she was younger.
It was not fraud, she voted once, for herself.
MRS. | |
| Groo does what Groo does best |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:31 - Nov 13 with 1066 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:23 - Nov 13 by Groo |
She voted her vote, she used a method of identifying herself that was common when she was younger.
It was not fraud, she voted once, for herself.
MRS. |
You can keep repeating it as much as you like. It won't make it any more true.
She voted in her husband's name, that was correctly picked up as a fraudulent ballot. It was the name of a dead man that died almost 2 decades prior.
You are making an argument that she didn't mean to. Ok well, we will take her word for it and hopefully there will be no repercussions for her, but the vote was still fraudulent. | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:35 - Nov 13 with 1059 views | Groo |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:31 - Nov 13 by Dr_Parnassus |
You can keep repeating it as much as you like. It won't make it any more true.
She voted in her husband's name, that was correctly picked up as a fraudulent ballot. It was the name of a dead man that died almost 2 decades prior.
You are making an argument that she didn't mean to. Ok well, we will take her word for it and hopefully there will be no repercussions for her, but the vote was still fraudulent. |
Here, let me help you out as you appear to be struggling.
Definition of Fraud:
"wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain."
This type of error could happen any time, any election. The woman did not commit fraud, she made her legal vote and used an incorect term to identify herself.
Of course I'm repeating myself, it is difficult to find different ways to say the same thing, but anyway this is my last word on the matter, even though I know you will insist on having the last word
We will have to agree to disagree, I'm sure your not that stupid though, as usual you are just being obtuse. | |
| Groo does what Groo does best |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:39 - Nov 13 with 1051 views | FieryJack |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:31 - Nov 13 by Dr_Parnassus |
You can keep repeating it as much as you like. It won't make it any more true.
She voted in her husband's name, that was correctly picked up as a fraudulent ballot. It was the name of a dead man that died almost 2 decades prior.
You are making an argument that she didn't mean to. Ok well, we will take her word for it and hopefully there will be no repercussions for her, but the vote was still fraudulent. |
Let go of the bone, Gradgrind, there's a good boy. |  | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:40 - Nov 13 with 1049 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:35 - Nov 13 by Groo |
Here, let me help you out as you appear to be struggling.
Definition of Fraud:
"wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain."
This type of error could happen any time, any election. The woman did not commit fraud, she made her legal vote and used an incorect term to identify herself.
Of course I'm repeating myself, it is difficult to find different ways to say the same thing, but anyway this is my last word on the matter, even though I know you will insist on having the last word
We will have to agree to disagree, I'm sure your not that stupid though, as usual you are just being obtuse. |
Yes, and that is why it is fraud.
Personal or financial gain is not needed to commit fraud by the way. If you pretend to be a police officer for fun, you are still committing fraud.
She didn't put her husband's name down by mistake. It was not a spelling mistake or a slip of the hand. It was intentional and it was a fraudulent ballot.
What you are arguing is that she wasn't aware she was committing fraud.. which of course it the defence of the people that often imitate cops too.
But as I said, the ballot is fraudulent so should not be counted (and of course quite rightly wont be). | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:41 - Nov 13 with 1047 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:39 - Nov 13 by FieryJack |
Let go of the bone, Gradgrind, there's a good boy. |
I am not the one with a bone. I am patiently explaining why the subject another poster keeps bringing up, is incorrect.
But yet again, top marks for your level of observation. | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:45 - Nov 13 with 1044 views | Kilkennyjack |
Its over. |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:50 - Nov 13 with 1037 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:45 - Nov 13 by Kilkennyjack |
Its over. |
What is? | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 21:13 - Nov 13 with 1017 views | Kilkennyjack |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:50 - Nov 13 by Dr_Parnassus |
What is? |
It is. | |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 21:29 - Nov 13 with 1010 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 21:13 - Nov 13 by Kilkennyjack |
It is. |
As I thought... | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 21:30 - Nov 13 with 1009 views | Kilkennyjack |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 21:29 - Nov 13 by Dr_Parnassus |
As I thought... |
You thought what ? | |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 21:35 - Nov 13 with 1007 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 21:30 - Nov 13 by Kilkennyjack |
You thought what ? |
I thought that you didn't know what your soundbites meant.
Which looks to be the case. | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 21:43 - Nov 13 with 1003 views | Kilkennyjack |
More good news ..,,
| |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 21:48 - Nov 13 with 996 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 21:43 - Nov 13 by Kilkennyjack |
More good news ..,,
|
Why is it good news that you are getting your news from a moron?
46 counties yet to certify. It is not final. | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 22:27 - Nov 13 with 977 views | Boundy |
Subtle differences can make all the difference
|  |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 22:40 - Nov 13 with 965 views | Kilkennyjack |
Just to be clear ...
In July, Pfizer got a $1.95 billion deal with the government’s Operation Warp Speed, the multiagency effort to rush a vaccine to market, to deliver 100 million doses of the vaccine. The arrangement is an advance-purchase agreement, meaning that the company won’t get paid until they deliver the vaccines.
Pfizer did not accept federal funding to help develop or manufacture the vaccine, unlike front-runners Moderna and AstraZeneca.
Pfizer has distanced itself from Mr. Trump and Operation Warp Speed.
Unlucky Trump, you orange moron. | |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
