| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 01:18 - Sep 29 with 234983 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Who will be watching? First one kicks off in 24 hours time.
The Democrats have pulled Joe back from his campaign trail recently to get him prepared, so hopefully it will be a decent exchange.
Unfortunately they don’t seem to have great confidence as they have spent the last month looking for any dirt they can dig up so Joe can use if he gets stuck.
It’s no coincidence that this vote influencing Facebook algorithm story is being shamelessly and inaccurately made into a race issue on the eve of the debates. So transparent and disingenuous, it’s a shame politics has come to this on this level where black people are being used in this way to score political points. I would be furious if I was them, but it does seem a lot of people are not falling for this one and calling it out for what it is.
People finally seem to be getting wise to this political race baiting which is refreshing to see.
It’s also telling that in the week of the debate they try and paint Trump as a tax evasion offender. I think that’s what they wanted the tax returns to show, they seem to have got annoyed when it turns out his tax returns were fine in accordance to what his companies profits were - but decided to run with it anyway. Any news is good news in their mind as it’s another thing Joe can use when in a tricky spot.
But I hope the discussions remain political and doesn’t turn into some form of gossip peddling reality TV episode.
Although I think there should be some kind of drinking game involved if it does turn that way, how many times Biden completely loses his thread of thought and blurts out “I mean, think about it...” you have to take a shot. 
I will be watching with great interest anyway.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| |  |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 00:40 - Nov 15 with 1415 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 00:29 - Nov 15 by Gwyn737 |
By that logic, lockdowns are pointless then. No point in closing shops, sports stadiums, gatherings etc.? They should be safe with Covid restrictions so it should be be fine?
You’re usually pretty measured so I can’t get my head around this argument. Really? Staying at home is as safe as going out?
Does the same idea apply to the common cold or flu? |
Yep, lockdowns are pointless, they serve short term solutions not standardised practices (as confirmed by the World Health Organisation).
Voting with masks and social distancing is not the same as sitting for hours in a football stadium.
Who said staying at home is safer than going out? I said they are both safe, so we need to pull for the one that fulfills the brief more in exceptionally important instances like a democratic vote.
Which is why people choose to light their homes with electricity instead of safer battery power, because both are safe enough to which you can choose the one that represents the better outcome.
If making an already safe practice even safer at the cost of the outcome was something we adopt across the board we wouldn't have left the house in our lifetimes.
This is a political issue not a safety one, but I suspect you know that deep down. [Post edited 15 Nov 2020 0:45]
| |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 00:53 - Nov 15 with 1394 views | Gwyn737 |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 00:40 - Nov 15 by Dr_Parnassus |
Yep, lockdowns are pointless, they serve short term solutions not standardised practices (as confirmed by the World Health Organisation).
Voting with masks and social distancing is not the same as sitting for hours in a football stadium.
Who said staying at home is safer than going out? I said they are both safe, so we need to pull for the one that fulfills the brief more in exceptionally important instances like a democratic vote.
Which is why people choose to light their homes with electricity instead of safer battery power, because both are safe enough to which you can choose the one that represents the better outcome.
If making an already safe practice even safer at the cost of the outcome was something we adopt across the board we wouldn't have left the house in our lifetimes.
This is a political issue not a safety one, but I suspect you know that deep down. [Post edited 15 Nov 2020 0:45]
|
No. It’s not.
In a pandemic postal voting is safer than in person voting. You’re making it political as it’s fits your agenda.
If lighting your home with batteries is as cost efficient an electricity then the outcome is the same and your argument holds weight. It doesn’t so your argument doesn’t.
Unlike you I’m racked with doubt on my opinions and will to change my mind. Show me evidence than the result of this election is irrefutably wrong and I’ll agree. Over to you. I’m more than happy if not to wait for the Supreme Court verdict (which is probably what you’ll say) because every step on that fruitless journey will go towards stopping a trump character ever being in the White House again. I welcome every ridiculous law suit (5 rejected today).
If you say it’s impossible to measure then it’s time to give up, accept the result and move on. |  | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 01:02 - Nov 15 with 1393 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 00:53 - Nov 15 by Gwyn737 |
No. It’s not.
In a pandemic postal voting is safer than in person voting. You’re making it political as it’s fits your agenda.
If lighting your home with batteries is as cost efficient an electricity then the outcome is the same and your argument holds weight. It doesn’t so your argument doesn’t.
Unlike you I’m racked with doubt on my opinions and will to change my mind. Show me evidence than the result of this election is irrefutably wrong and I’ll agree. Over to you. I’m more than happy if not to wait for the Supreme Court verdict (which is probably what you’ll say) because every step on that fruitless journey will go towards stopping a trump character ever being in the White House again. I welcome every ridiculous law suit (5 rejected today).
If you say it’s impossible to measure then it’s time to give up, accept the result and move on. |
Yep, it is.
They are both safe, one being safer than the other is irrelevant. As I just pointed out if both options are safe then the brief is the most important thing otherwise, again, we wouldn't have left our houses in our lifetime.
I have pointed out the many ways that already safe practices aren't ditched by society for an even safer option when the brief is being affected - which it is as mail in balloting is factually and historically unreliable.
I haven't claimed the result of this election is irrefutably wrong, not once. My point is that we have no idea because such a large chunk of it was conducted by a historically inaccurate method, which should never be the case in an election of such magnitude.
I also didn't say it was impossible to measure. I have not seen the evidence, and neither have you. From what we do know, I think it would be incredibly hard to prove with sworn affidavits alone but I am not a judge.
I also absolutely do not recommend anyone surrender to suspected malpractice and fraud until the courts decide they have to. In the interests of democracy every and all public complaints should be investigated in full. Which I would hope you agree with. [Post edited 15 Nov 2020 1:07]
| |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 03:55 - Nov 15 with 1358 views | DJack |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:55 - Nov 13 by Dr_Parnassus |
It was fraudulent. She put her husbands name on the ballot who died 14 years prior.
We know of thousands of dead people that have requested and submitted votes. That’s fraudulent too.
They are now trying to determine the impact of that and how many were actually counted. This is a long process.
I’m going to apply for a credit card in my dead aunties name, if they come back and catch me for fraud I’ll say “nah, it was a tribute”. |
Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Friday apologized to viewers after a local Georgia news outlet pointed out that he had made a false claim about a dead individual illegally voting in the state.
On a Thursday evening segment of “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” the host claimed that someone had cast a ballot on behalf of James Blalock of Covington, Ga., who died in 2006.
During his show Friday, Carlson apologized to viewers and issued a correction.
"We've got some good news tonight and an apology," he said. "One of the people who voted in last week's election isn't dead. James Blalock is still dead. We told you about him, but it was his wife who voted. She voted as Mrs. James Blalock. It's old-fashioned, and we missed it."
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/525980-tucker-carlson-issues-on-air-apology-o |  |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:00 - Nov 15 with 1357 views | DJack |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:55 - Nov 13 by Dr_Parnassus |
It was fraudulent. She put her husbands name on the ballot who died 14 years prior.
We know of thousands of dead people that have requested and submitted votes. That’s fraudulent too.
They are now trying to determine the impact of that and how many were actually counted. This is a long process.
I’m going to apply for a credit card in my dead aunties name, if they come back and catch me for fraud I’ll say “nah, it was a tribute”. |
Newton County Statement on 2020 Election
Image of Elections Door
The media reports of a deceased voter casting their ballot in Newton County are inaccurate.
James E. Blalock, Jr. passed away in 2006 and was purged from the Secretary of State database that year. His widow, Mrs. James E. Blalock, Jr. has always voted under that name and continued to do so through this year’s election. The Secretary of State’s database does not pick up the pre-fix of Mrs., and a check in her profile shows she is a female. Her signature on the records reflects that her voter registration was signed as Mrs. James E. Blalock, Jr. and that is exactly how she signed her name when she voted in the Nov. 3 General Election.
https://www.facebook.com/NewtonCountyGA/photos/a.521643817940430/316418245701987 | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:04 - Nov 15 with 1356 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:00 - Nov 15 by DJack |
Newton County Statement on 2020 Election
Image of Elections Door
The media reports of a deceased voter casting their ballot in Newton County are inaccurate.
James E. Blalock, Jr. passed away in 2006 and was purged from the Secretary of State database that year. His widow, Mrs. James E. Blalock, Jr. has always voted under that name and continued to do so through this year’s election. The Secretary of State’s database does not pick up the pre-fix of Mrs., and a check in her profile shows she is a female. Her signature on the records reflects that her voter registration was signed as Mrs. James E. Blalock, Jr. and that is exactly how she signed her name when she voted in the Nov. 3 General Election.
https://www.facebook.com/NewtonCountyGA/photos/a.521643817940430/316418245701987 |
Christ that’s worrying, so she has fraudulently voted on more than one occasion and hasn’t had a problem until people have actively looked into it this year.
A perfect demonstration of the lack of checks that go on at these polling stations. | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:20 - Nov 15 with 1347 views | DJack |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:04 - Nov 15 by Dr_Parnassus |
Christ that’s worrying, so she has fraudulently voted on more than one occasion and hasn’t had a problem until people have actively looked into it this year.
A perfect demonstration of the lack of checks that go on at these polling stations. |
Bullshit. It is not fraudulent. | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:23 - Nov 15 with 1346 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:20 - Nov 15 by DJack |
Bullshit. It is not fraudulent. |
Which part is bullshit?
She intentionally wrote a name that was not hers down on a ballot. She clearly didn't realise it was fraud, it's safe to say.
She needs to stop doing that going forward and I am sure she has been told in no uncertain terms. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:27 - Nov 15 with 1344 views | DJack |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:23 - Nov 15 by Dr_Parnassus |
Which part is bullshit?
She intentionally wrote a name that was not hers down on a ballot. She clearly didn't realise it was fraud, it's safe to say.
She needs to stop doing that going forward and I am sure she has been told in no uncertain terms. |
She signed as she was registered to vote. | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:40 - Nov 15 with 1340 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:27 - Nov 15 by DJack |
She signed as she was registered to vote. |
Her signature was the same yes, which is maybe why it slipped through the net.
But you cannot be legally registered to vote under a name that is not legally yours. | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:46 - Nov 15 with 1334 views | DJack |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:40 - Nov 15 by Dr_Parnassus |
Her signature was the same yes, which is maybe why it slipped through the net.
But you cannot be legally registered to vote under a name that is not legally yours. |
Well then I'm sure that you will find and post the regulation to back up your claim...over to you. | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 05:00 - Nov 15 with 1323 views | Dr_Parnassus |
I can hear your frantic Google searches from here 
(Stop wasting your time) | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 05:23 - Nov 15 with 1317 views | Groo |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 04:20 - Nov 15 by DJack |
Bullshit. It is not fraudulent. |
I've been down this path with him, its pointless, he doesn't give an inch, even in cases like this where he is obviously 100% wrong.
Its obvious to anyone with half a brain cell that she had a legal vote, 1 legal vote. She made 1 vote and she identified herself in an old fashioned way (she is 94) which is not recognised as valid.
A mistake, not fraud, she did not vote for someone else, she didn't vote in her name then made a sneaky extra vote for that nice Mr Biden. She voted once, as is her legal right, for the person she wanted to vote for, as is her legal right.
She has probably, proudly, referred to herself as Mrs. James E. Blalock, Jr (a war hero from WW2) for many many years without issue.
Yet Mr Obtuse will not budge and inch, he calls it a fraudulant vote.
I gave up on it, not because he is right, as he is not, but the fact that he will never admit an error.
I come to the conclusion he is either very thick or he does this as a form of therapy for himself, wind people up. Most amusing and I feel extremely sorry for him if this is the best in life he can aim for. |  |
| Groo does what Groo does best |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 05:39 - Nov 15 with 1313 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 05:23 - Nov 15 by Groo |
I've been down this path with him, its pointless, he doesn't give an inch, even in cases like this where he is obviously 100% wrong.
Its obvious to anyone with half a brain cell that she had a legal vote, 1 legal vote. She made 1 vote and she identified herself in an old fashioned way (she is 94) which is not recognised as valid.
A mistake, not fraud, she did not vote for someone else, she didn't vote in her name then made a sneaky extra vote for that nice Mr Biden. She voted once, as is her legal right, for the person she wanted to vote for, as is her legal right.
She has probably, proudly, referred to herself as Mrs. James E. Blalock, Jr (a war hero from WW2) for many many years without issue.
Yet Mr Obtuse will not budge and inch, he calls it a fraudulant vote.
I gave up on it, not because he is right, as he is not, but the fact that he will never admit an error.
I come to the conclusion he is either very thick or he does this as a form of therapy for himself, wind people up. Most amusing and I feel extremely sorry for him if this is the best in life he can aim for. |
I don’t give an inch because I am absolutely and unequivocally correct.
She had the opportunity to cast a legal vote, yes, agreed.
She unintentionally made it into an illegal vote by fraudulently representing herself as a different name, one that does not exist. Hence why it is not a valid ballot and was picked up for fraud.
She didn’t make a mistake as you claim, she fully intended to put another name down. A mistake would be a spelling error or failure to mark the right box. She fully intended to put that name down, which means she wasn’t aware what she was doing was fraudulent - which is probably very likely in this case.
Being proud to do so is not an excuse to do it.
If the best comeback you have to obvious fact and common sense is to name call and personally abuse then it probably says more about you than me. A leftist trait seen time and time again on these threads, it’s nothing new.
Thankfully voting regulations agree with me and the vote will not count. [Post edited 15 Nov 2020 5:42]
| |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 06:04 - Nov 15 with 1307 views | Groo |
Oh, and he always, I mean ALWAYS, has to have the last word.
He also sprinkles in "we agreed this earlier" in some of his posts, when "we" certainly did not.
Welcome to the Dr. P show. | |
| Groo does what Groo does best |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 06:07 - Nov 15 with 1306 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 06:04 - Nov 15 by Groo |
Oh, and he always, I mean ALWAYS, has to have the last word.
He also sprinkles in "we agreed this earlier" in some of his posts, when "we" certainly did not.
Welcome to the Dr. P show. |
Huh?
I never understand this “last word” argument trotted out by people on forums. Isn’t the point of a forum to discuss topics? If so then why does it only end when you want it to end?
Such a bizarre thought process.
As for stating “we agreed” I only state that when we have, often people don’t realise they have agreed though. Like the last example (I assume that is what you are referring to) when the poster said it was safe to vote in person many times without actually realising what he was saying.
So when I presented that he agreed with me it was safe he got caught on the hop because he had forgotten what he had typed. Pretty simple really Groo, all examples will be the same. Do you have any specific instances in mind?
Happy to address them. [Post edited 15 Nov 2020 6:12]
| |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 06:22 - Nov 15 with 1299 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Didn’t think so... | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 11:53 - Nov 15 with 1220 views | A_Fans_Dad |
I see that Antifa ensured that the nice peaceful demonstration their support of their President ended in violence, with them attacking all sorts of peaceful people going about their own business yet again. [Post edited 15 Nov 2020 20:33]
| | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 13:32 - Nov 15 with 1187 views | DJack |
noun, plural de·moc·ra·cies.
government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.
Your comments in this thread
"Democracy is the most important thing."
"The result I want IS democracy. "
"There is always likely to be bigger Democrat votes, there are more democrats than republicans."
Ergo, America should have the Democrats in power.
| |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 13:57 - Nov 15 with 1177 views | A_Fans_Dad |
So Biden like the Clintons also has problems with his cancer research charity, but of course it is not splashed across every paper and TV headline.
$4,809,619 taken in and $3,070,301 went on wages plus another $150,000 on travel and $850,000 on conferences.
Grants for Cancer research = $000000, yes, Zero | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 19:53 - Nov 15 with 1127 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 11:53 - Nov 15 by A_Fans_Dad |
I see that Antifa ensured that the nice peaceful demonstration their support of their President ended in violence, with them attacking all sorts of peaceful people going about their own business yet again. [Post edited 15 Nov 2020 20:33]
|
Silence on it, it’s very telling isn’t it.
Now imagine if everybody who was targeted for violence was targeted because they were black.
Imagine the outrage on here, not a single thread would be going elsewhere it would solely be on the shocking violence levelled at a group of people.
Republicans however... “meh whatever”.
This was the danger of identity politics and is exactly how fascist parties slowly dehumanise their political opposition to make targeted violence seem acceptable as opposed to fascist oppression. | |
| |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:46 - Nov 15 with 1105 views | A_Fans_Dad |
There has been a lot of research in to Dominion voting machines, it is really deep state and quite shocking.
I will list the findings from GP here, sorry it is so long.
Dominion serves 40% of the US market. It is in 30 states.
— The state of Texas rejected the machines.
— Smartmatic entered into an agreement with Dominion in 2009
— Smartmatic is connected to Philippine voter fraud
— Smartmatic is run by Lord Mark Malloch Brown who works for George Soros.
— Brown chairs the Boards of a number of non-profit boards including the Open Society Foundation,
— Brown chairs the Centre for Global Development.
— Open society of course is owned by George Soros
— Smartmatic partnered with DLA Piper Global
— Douglas C. Emhoff works at DLA Piper Global
— Douglass C. Emhoff is Kamala Harris’s husband
— Guess who owns Dominion? Blum Capital Partners, L.P. ***
— Guess who is on the board for the company? Richard C. Blum. ***
— Richard C. Blum is husband to Dianne Feinstein. ***
— Nancy Pelosi’s husband is also an investor
— An aide to Nancy Pelosi, Nadeam Elshami, was hired by the Dominion Voting Systems
— Dominion Voting Systems is literally listed on the Clinton Foundation website.
— “The DELIAN Project: Democracy through Technology” is the title of the page.
— Georgia Governor Kemp purchased machines after Texas and Florida rejected
— Dominion Voting has a lobbyist name Jared Thomas
— Jared Thomas was Governor Brian Kemp’s chief of staff and press secretary from 2012 to 2015
— You must remember the Feinstein-Kavanaugh-Soros connections to understand the depth
— Debra Katz (Christine Ford’s lawyer) worked for George-Soros at the Open Society Foundation.
— Debra Katz (Christine Ford’s lawyer) also worked at Project on Government Oversight (POGO).
— POGO is funded by Soros’s Open Society Foundation.
— POGO is the co-signer of the letter Diane Feinstein had on Kavanaugh.
— Kamala Harris did not prosecute OneWest Bank for their fraud
— Soros owned OneWest Bank.
— Now you know why a woman who placed 7th in her state is a VP candidate | | | |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 21:01 - Nov 15 with 1096 views | Boundy |
| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 on 20:46 - Nov 15 by A_Fans_Dad |
There has been a lot of research in to Dominion voting machines, it is really deep state and quite shocking.
I will list the findings from GP here, sorry it is so long.
Dominion serves 40% of the US market. It is in 30 states.
— The state of Texas rejected the machines.
— Smartmatic entered into an agreement with Dominion in 2009
— Smartmatic is connected to Philippine voter fraud
— Smartmatic is run by Lord Mark Malloch Brown who works for George Soros.
— Brown chairs the Boards of a number of non-profit boards including the Open Society Foundation,
— Brown chairs the Centre for Global Development.
— Open society of course is owned by George Soros
— Smartmatic partnered with DLA Piper Global
— Douglas C. Emhoff works at DLA Piper Global
— Douglass C. Emhoff is Kamala Harris’s husband
— Guess who owns Dominion? Blum Capital Partners, L.P. ***
— Guess who is on the board for the company? Richard C. Blum. ***
— Richard C. Blum is husband to Dianne Feinstein. ***
— Nancy Pelosi’s husband is also an investor
— An aide to Nancy Pelosi, Nadeam Elshami, was hired by the Dominion Voting Systems
— Dominion Voting Systems is literally listed on the Clinton Foundation website.
— “The DELIAN Project: Democracy through Technology” is the title of the page.
— Georgia Governor Kemp purchased machines after Texas and Florida rejected
— Dominion Voting has a lobbyist name Jared Thomas
— Jared Thomas was Governor Brian Kemp’s chief of staff and press secretary from 2012 to 2015
— You must remember the Feinstein-Kavanaugh-Soros connections to understand the depth
— Debra Katz (Christine Ford’s lawyer) worked for George-Soros at the Open Society Foundation.
— Debra Katz (Christine Ford’s lawyer) also worked at Project on Government Oversight (POGO).
— POGO is funded by Soros’s Open Society Foundation.
— POGO is the co-signer of the letter Diane Feinstein had on Kavanaugh.
— Kamala Harris did not prosecute OneWest Bank for their fraud
— Soros owned OneWest Bank.
— Now you know why a woman who placed 7th in her state is a VP candidate |
The same machines (along with another two companies ) which Democrat leaders, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren (MA), Amy Klobuchar (MN), and Ron Wyden (OR), were concerned about in 2019 ,of which they had issues with “vulnerabilities and a lack of transparency in the election technology industry and the poor condition of voting machines and other election technology equipment,” Warren’s office said of the letter. A letter was sent to the following:
H.I.G. Capital, investing in Hart InterCivic
McCarthy Group, investing in Election Systems & Software
Staple Street Capital, investing in Dominion Voting Systems and within the letter the 3 sought information about what role the firms had in perpetuating the technology issues.
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/13/top-democrats-raised-concerns | |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
