| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? 00:41 - Oct 5 with 1240 views | Goldminer |
Seems to be hiding when we have the ball and his pointing for other players to cover reminds me of a certain John Jo Shelvey. Galbraith and Franco for me should be our middle pairing. [Post edited 5 Oct 0:42]
|  | | |  |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 06:57 - Oct 5 with 1152 views | jack247 |
I can see the comparison based on yesterdays game. He didn’t seem to demand the ball and invariably gave it safe when he got it. Makes it much harder for players around him.
In his first game in particular, he was making himself available constantly, playing confident, meaningful passes and carrying it forward when he got the chance. There’s definitely a player there, but he did have an off game.
In fairness to Fulton, he’s one of our best players in a physical battle or when we’re out of possession. | | | |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 10:14 - Oct 5 with 1028 views | johnlangy |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 06:57 - Oct 5 by jack247 |
I can see the comparison based on yesterdays game. He didn’t seem to demand the ball and invariably gave it safe when he got it. Makes it much harder for players around him.
In his first game in particular, he was making himself available constantly, playing confident, meaningful passes and carrying it forward when he got the chance. There’s definitely a player there, but he did have an off game.
In fairness to Fulton, he’s one of our best players in a physical battle or when we’re out of possession. |
He had an off first half but was much better second half after the subs came on. | | | |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 10:21 - Oct 5 with 1012 views | Whiterockin |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 10:14 - Oct 5 by johnlangy |
He had an off first half but was much better second half after the subs came on. |
We changed our shape then and were not playing 4-1-4-1. |  | | |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 10:23 - Oct 5 with 988 views | onehunglow |
We don’t need another Fulton
Stamenuc another being misused
Do some want Fulton to be given a lifelong job with us ? | |
| |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 12:02 - Oct 5 with 904 views | hobo |
Exactly what the Olympiakos fans said about him (well, not the Fulton part) [Post edited 5 Oct 12:02]
|  | | |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 16:23 - Oct 5 with 777 views | wwcigne |
I just wish we’d stop the short goal kicks constantly,shake it up a bit,play it longer occasionally to stop us being so predictable and easy to play against,also stop all the faffing across at the back line and play out quicker, be more adventurous and play football with more forward ambition,on the occasions we have we look dangerous and have created chances and scored some good goals .
We have the players to do it ,so why not
Just watched Ipswich and they only play forward and quick football but retain their defensive shape to counter any turnovers and the forward players bust a gut to get back cover any potential danger
Great to watch | | | |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 16:42 - Oct 5 with 757 views | KeithHaynes |
If he was another Fulton at his age he would be chipping in with the odd goal and getting far further forwards. |  |
| |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 10:30 - Oct 6 with 593 views | Legend83 |
In my view on what I have seen in the last few games, Stamenic is the answer to a problem that didn't seem to be there.
He is clearly a good player on his day, but as a team we seemed to function much better when Galbreith was playing the quarterback role.
Stamenic should be playing the Pratley role in my opinion as he seems to have those qualities. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 10:35 - Oct 6 with 582 views | onehunglow |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 10:30 - Oct 6 by Legend83 |
In my view on what I have seen in the last few games, Stamenic is the answer to a problem that didn't seem to be there.
He is clearly a good player on his day, but as a team we seemed to function much better when Galbreith was playing the quarterback role.
Stamenic should be playing the Pratley role in my opinion as he seems to have those qualities. |
He could and should be a main man
He has size and a presence which we have lacked for years
He needs to be utilised properly though
I don’t think he is at present | |
| |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 11:03 - Oct 6 with 571 views | wwcigne |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 10:35 - Oct 6 by onehunglow |
He could and should be a main man
He has size and a presence which we have lacked for years
He needs to be utilised properly though
I don’t think he is at present |
We need him to be the player he was on his debut, looking to get on the front foot,carrying and passing the ball forward and looking for the ball , not the Stamenic we saw Saturday, who didn’t seem to want the ball and when he got it passed it sideways and back,a la Grimes when he was here
Or was he following orders
We are a better team when we play forward with pace | | | |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 11:24 - Oct 6 with 542 views | RichardO |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 16:23 - Oct 5 by wwcigne |
I just wish we’d stop the short goal kicks constantly,shake it up a bit,play it longer occasionally to stop us being so predictable and easy to play against,also stop all the faffing across at the back line and play out quicker, be more adventurous and play football with more forward ambition,on the occasions we have we look dangerous and have created chances and scored some good goals .
We have the players to do it ,so why not
Just watched Ipswich and they only play forward and quick football but retain their defensive shape to counter any turnovers and the forward players bust a gut to get back cover any potential danger
Great to watch |
When we do decide to go long from the goal kicks I do wish we would take the time for our centrehalves to get up the pitch to condense the middle of the park enabling them to coming onto opposition clearanes instead of there being big gaps, would also agree about keeping that defensive 4 shape solid tight to your players allowing them no time on the ball, we have to be careful against the ball over the top but both Cabango and Burgess are capable defenders to ensure the fullback are covered but the midfield has to be aware that cover maybe be needed in the middle or down the flanks | | | |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 13:44 - Oct 6 with 473 views | sw02sea |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 11:24 - Oct 6 by RichardO |
When we do decide to go long from the goal kicks I do wish we would take the time for our centrehalves to get up the pitch to condense the middle of the park enabling them to coming onto opposition clearanes instead of there being big gaps, would also agree about keeping that defensive 4 shape solid tight to your players allowing them no time on the ball, we have to be careful against the ball over the top but both Cabango and Burgess are capable defenders to ensure the fullback are covered but the midfield has to be aware that cover maybe be needed in the middle or down the flanks |
He needs to play further forward, which he did when he first came here.
I desperately hope Sheehan doesn’t waste him, playing the”the Fulton” role.
It’s early days, but thought he picked the wrong side Saturday, and why is Ronald’s name first on his team sheet? I know he’s scored goals this season, but as a winger, he can’t beat a man, and flatters to deceive most games. | | | |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 13:54 - Oct 6 with 454 views | onehunglow |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 11:03 - Oct 6 by wwcigne |
We need him to be the player he was on his debut, looking to get on the front foot,carrying and passing the ball forward and looking for the ball , not the Stamenic we saw Saturday, who didn’t seem to want the ball and when he got it passed it sideways and back,a la Grimes when he was here
Or was he following orders
We are a better team when we play forward with pace |
As we did at the Forest game
I don’t understand Sheehan at all | |
| |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 14:06 - Oct 6 with 438 views | wwcigne |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 13:54 - Oct 6 by onehunglow |
As we did at the Forest game
I don’t understand Sheehan at all |
You’re right there , most couldn’t understand it either.
I think Sheehan baffled all of us on Saturday,you could hear the groaning every time we played the ball backwards,either from midfield or even on occasion from out wide , and it happened a lot,it just seemed so negative and lacking ambition
I hope he’s learned and we never have to witness it again | | | |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 14:07 - Oct 6 with 430 views | RichardO |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 13:44 - Oct 6 by sw02sea |
He needs to play further forward, which he did when he first came here.
I desperately hope Sheehan doesn’t waste him, playing the”the Fulton” role.
It’s early days, but thought he picked the wrong side Saturday, and why is Ronald’s name first on his team sheet? I know he’s scored goals this season, but as a winger, he can’t beat a man, and flatters to deceive most games. |
If Stamenic pushes up then who covers Tymon and Key's runs forward, there needs to be a bit of fuildity in the team, we saw O'Brien covering the fullbacks or even dropping into the space left by Tymon's runs making himself available to receive the ball and made himself time on the ball to see want opened up infront of him. But for the most part we are talking about when we are in possession of the ball, we really need to be looking at our issues when not in possession of the ball which allow teams to take points off us at the moment. | | | |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 14:30 - Oct 6 with 399 views | Whiterockin |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 14:07 - Oct 6 by RichardO |
If Stamenic pushes up then who covers Tymon and Key's runs forward, there needs to be a bit of fuildity in the team, we saw O'Brien covering the fullbacks or even dropping into the space left by Tymon's runs making himself available to receive the ball and made himself time on the ball to see want opened up infront of him. But for the most part we are talking about when we are in possession of the ball, we really need to be looking at our issues when not in possession of the ball which allow teams to take points off us at the moment. |
Galbraith playing alongside Stamenic for me with possibly Yalcouye or Franco advanced. Galbraith can cover Key and Stamenic can cover Tymon. Stamenic and Galbraith are totally different players and can offer us the variation we need, particularly with Galbraith running from deep. | | | |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 14:52 - Oct 6 with 358 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 14:07 - Oct 6 by RichardO |
If Stamenic pushes up then who covers Tymon and Key's runs forward, there needs to be a bit of fuildity in the team, we saw O'Brien covering the fullbacks or even dropping into the space left by Tymon's runs making himself available to receive the ball and made himself time on the ball to see want opened up infront of him. But for the most part we are talking about when we are in possession of the ball, we really need to be looking at our issues when not in possession of the ball which allow teams to take points off us at the moment. |
We haven’t conceded many from open play though to be fair, apart from the odd worldie so we don’t really need to tinker that much defensively. Set pieces continue to be an Achilles heel for us. Andy Robinson on the radio picked up for leicesters third goal that we didn’t have any players forming a wall which gave the free kick taker the chance to basically put it where he wanted. We conceded a similar goal against Millwall. And why when we have a free kick in a perfect position for a strike on goal did we insist on rolling the ball back and allow the defenders to close it down? Cullen’s scored a few from that position in the past. Our decision making is awful sometimes. |  |
| |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 17:12 - Oct 6 with 284 views | Dr_Winston |
Is Stamenic another Fulton? Hopefully. We saw against Hull what having no Fultons does for us and it wasn't good. Having two can only help. |  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 18:17 - Oct 6 with 230 views | vetchonian |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 17:12 - Oct 6 by Dr_Winston |
Is Stamenic another Fulton? Hopefully. We saw against Hull what having no Fultons does for us and it wasn't good. Having two can only help. |
Totally agre with this but I think Stamenic has a little more to offer his debut against Watford he was driving forwards with the ball .....on reflevction a little like Fulton was when he was first here.... | |
| |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 22:15 - Oct 6 with 152 views | sw02sea |
| Stamenic- is he another Fulton? on 17:12 - Oct 6 by Dr_Winston |
Is Stamenic another Fulton? Hopefully. We saw against Hull what having no Fultons does for us and it wasn't good. Having two can only help. |
Two Fultons ?! Gawd help us. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
