| Eze 09:08 - Apr 16 with 94906 views | sdm1508 |
I was just wondering what people's thoughts are on him since he moved to palace. Do you think he has improved as a player and if so what areas of his game have got better since he was with us or having better players around him helped? I mean having better players around him allows for more things to actually come off for him. He might have tried something with us and the players couldn't react etc
I was watching him in a game the other night and it just seems to be his consistency. His base level now seems to be a notch or two up. He doesn't have to do something amazing to effect the game |  | | |  |
| Eze on 21:23 - Aug 15 with 2454 views | Toast_R |
If he's an Arsenal fan, surely there is no way he signs for Spurs? |  | | |
| Eze on 21:25 - Aug 15 with 2400 views | kensalriser |
| Eze on 10:57 - Aug 15 by simmo |
Release clause expires today. Let's see how that changes things... |
I still can't see how that changes anything.
No one wants to pay the release clause figure otherwise they would have done by now. Palace could have sold at any time for less if there was an offer they wanted to accept. The latter is still the case. |  |
| |
| Eze on 00:53 - Aug 16 with 2026 views | simmo |
| Eze on 21:25 - Aug 15 by kensalriser |
I still can't see how that changes anything.
No one wants to pay the release clause figure otherwise they would have done by now. Palace could have sold at any time for less if there was an offer they wanted to accept. The latter is still the case. |
I think the issue with the release clause is that it included a minimum initial payment as part of the overall fee, rumoured to be around £30m or so. From what I understand that was the negotiation/sticking point up to now.
Of course it may well make no difference at all, as you say. |  |
| ask Beavis I get nothing Butthead |
| |
| Eze on 13:02 - Aug 16 with 1500 views | Gloucs_R |
Bid from Spurs imminent
55m plus add ons
Which would give us 5-6m
Hopefully Palace hold out for much more than that. |  |
| |
| Eze on 13:09 - Aug 16 with 1458 views | StreathamRanger |
| Eze on 13:02 - Aug 16 by Gloucs_R |
Bid from Spurs imminent
55m plus add ons
Which would give us 5-6m
Hopefully Palace hold out for much more than that. |
Would it not give us £11Million if we have 20%? | | | |
| Eze on 13:11 - Aug 16 with 1431 views | vanrrrr |
| Eze on 13:02 - Aug 16 by Gloucs_R |
Bid from Spurs imminent
55m plus add ons
Which would give us 5-6m
Hopefully Palace hold out for much more than that. |
Not in Palace squad tomorrow apparently. Looks like Spurs bound | | | |
| Eze on 13:39 - Aug 16 with 1307 views | MedwayR |
| Eze on 13:09 - Aug 16 by StreathamRanger |
Would it not give us £11Million if we have 20%? |
Depends on what the sell-on actually is. 15% or 20%, full fee or profit. Safe to say we'd get anywhere between approx. £6-11m if it was £55m, but I suspect Palace will want more particularly considering our sell-on as they wouldn't have much money or time left to find a replacement.. |  |
| |
| Eze on 13:40 - Aug 16 with 1304 views | Gloucs_R |
| Eze on 13:09 - Aug 16 by StreathamRanger |
Would it not give us £11Million if we have 20%? |
Depends who you believe but I've read that (worst case) is 15% of profit | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Eze on 13:48 - Aug 16 with 1220 views | dmm |
The sell on clause when Eze went from us to Palace was reported to be 20%. So that being the case, if it's a £55m sale to Spurs we get £11m. |  | | |
| Eze on 13:51 - Aug 16 with 1185 views | DavieQPR |
Was always widely accepted to be to be 20% until a few of the doom merchants turned up. |  | | |
| Eze on 13:56 - Aug 16 with 1134 views | Loyalitat |
| Eze on 13:51 - Aug 16 by DavieQPR |
Was always widely accepted to be to be 20% until a few of the doom merchants turned up. |
20% of any profit realised on what Palace paid initially to sign him from us: circa £20m. If £55m is paid by Spurs, we'll get circa £7m. [Post edited 16 Aug 13:56]
| | | |
| Eze on 14:07 - Aug 16 with 1066 views | kensalriser |
Has anyone actually seen this release clause in full?
That's a rhetorical question. We don't really know and never will because if and when Eze is sold the club won't be telling us what it received never mind how it was calculated. | |
| |
| Eze on 14:33 - Aug 16 with 952 views | Gloucs_R |
| Eze on 14:07 - Aug 16 by kensalriser |
Has anyone actually seen this release clause in full?
That's a rhetorical question. We don't really know and never will because if and when Eze is sold the club won't be telling us what it received never mind how it was calculated. |
Seen the release clause?
We don't even know if Colback had been released!!! 😁 | |
| |
| Eze on 17:49 - Aug 16 with 696 views | loftboy |
| Eze on 13:56 - Aug 16 by Loyalitat |
20% of any profit realised on what Palace paid initially to sign him from us: circa £20m. If £55m is paid by Spurs, we'll get circa £7m. [Post edited 16 Aug 13:56]
|
Nope, we got the same deal as we got with Sterling, % whether it’s 15 or 20 who knows! of the whole fee not the profit. |  |
| |
| Eze on 20:32 - Aug 16 with 348 views | NorthantsHoop |
| Eze on 17:49 - Aug 16 by loftboy |
Nope, we got the same deal as we got with Sterling, % whether it’s 15 or 20 who knows! of the whole fee not the profit. |
Think we should just invest it in an ISA and keep it tax free and away from Rachel from accounts. [Post edited 16 Aug 20:33]
|  | | |
| Eze on 20:53 - Aug 16 with 246 views | 1JD |
| Eze on 17:49 - Aug 16 by loftboy |
Nope, we got the same deal as we got with Sterling, % whether it’s 15 or 20 who knows! of the whole fee not the profit. |
Most clauses are profit, not full sale.
Sterling was profit, it’s just his fee was so low (circa 1m), and sold for 50m, we banked nearly 10m, based on the profit. (20% of 49m is nearly 10m which is what we received as sell on) [Post edited 16 Aug 20:54]
| | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
