| Eze 09:08 - Apr 16 with 133234 views | sdm1508 |
I was just wondering what people's thoughts are on him since he moved to palace. Do you think he has improved as a player and if so what areas of his game have got better since he was with us or having better players around him helped? I mean having better players around him allows for more things to actually come off for him. He might have tried something with us and the players couldn't react etc
I was watching him in a game the other night and it just seems to be his consistency. His base level now seems to be a notch or two up. He doesn't have to do something amazing to effect the game |  | | |  |
| Eze on 12:19 - Aug 21 with 1324 views | CroydonCaptJack |
| Eze on 11:30 - Aug 21 by queensparker |
Would this make him our second AND fourth record transfer fee? That’s pretty cool if so
(Sterling 1, Samba 3?) |
I think he is ahead of Sterling?
What figure do you have for Sterlings sell on in £m? |  |
| |
| Eze on 13:00 - Aug 21 with 1001 views | GroveR |
| Eze on 11:22 - Aug 21 by GaryBannister86 |
Or when we spend £8m bringing Nakhi Wells in from Luton, paid upfront in full? May give us a clue. |
Might be difficult to determine an exact breakdown of what's come from where if we get £10m for Madsen though. |  | | |
| Eze on 13:04 - Aug 21 with 956 views | GroveR |
| Eze on 11:30 - Aug 21 by queensparker |
Would this make him our second AND fourth record transfer fee? That’s pretty cool if so
(Sterling 1, Samba 3?) |
Very little profit on the Samba transfers if any. Unscientifically I'd say Eze's brought in more net profit than all of our previous transfers combined. | | | |
| Eze on 13:05 - Aug 21 with 930 views | Benny_the_Ball |
| Eze on 08:49 - Aug 21 by loftboy |
Whatever the sell on is I genuinely hope we use the majority of it to reduce our debt, seeing what’s happening at Sheffield Wednesday should be a reminder to all the “sign a striker now” brigade. |
We've already signed 2 strikers in this window so there's little danger of signing another. |  | | |
| Eze on 13:18 - Aug 21 with 790 views | nick_hammersmith |
| Eze on 13:05 - Aug 21 by Benny_the_Ball |
We've already signed 2 strikers in this window so there's little danger of signing another. |
How do you measure the debt?
At the moment our owners convert the losses into shares, so we are not technically in that much debt.
However, if they want to try and recoup there spending isn't it something mental like more than £500m over the time they've been here? |  | | |
| Eze on 13:21 - Aug 21 with 755 views | Match82 |
| Eze on 13:04 - Aug 21 by GroveR |
Very little profit on the Samba transfers if any. Unscientifically I'd say Eze's brought in more net profit than all of our previous transfers combined. |
It's a genuine source of irritation to me that we have to talk about Chris Samba when talking about our record transfer fees, that was the least subtle bit of dodgy book keeping ever. |  | | |
| Eze on 13:59 - Aug 21 with 447 views | themodfather |
this is great, takes focus off imo a poor start, no wins in 3, out of cup (when 2-0 up and we saved a penalty)
be great if most of any money from sale goes into the team and maybe a new DRUM lol! | | | |
| Eze on 14:02 - Aug 21 with 413 views | Hunterhoop |
| Eze on 11:15 - Aug 21 by priceyparkrangers |
For the last few years it’s always been 20% of the entire sale, from the likes of West London Sport, Sir Les himself etc… why in the last few days is everyone now saying 15% of just the profit.
The difference between the two is £6M - I know the club is unlikely to tell us - but I do think we need to know which it actually is. |
I’ve found this interesting. There are a few possible answers:
1) the club want everyone to think we’ve received less than we actually have (competitive advantage and all that) was it will temper inflation on any transfer fees or wages we might need to offer. Wise
2) we have already bought Palace out of some of it (which might explain last summer’s outlay on Madsen and Celar without anything coming in. Accounts potentially declaring this income from July/Aug 2024 don’t have to be shared until March 2026.
3) Les/Hoos/local were all lying all those years back and it wasn’t 20% fee, it was 15% of profit.
I find the latter hard to believe. It was universally reported as 20% of the total fee… That would mean it is one of options 1 or 2.
As Clive has said, we’ll find out by March ‘27 or based on our activity in the next week or so! |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Eze on 14:13 - Aug 21 with 291 views | TK1 |
| Eze on 14:02 - Aug 21 by Hunterhoop |
I’ve found this interesting. There are a few possible answers:
1) the club want everyone to think we’ve received less than we actually have (competitive advantage and all that) was it will temper inflation on any transfer fees or wages we might need to offer. Wise
2) we have already bought Palace out of some of it (which might explain last summer’s outlay on Madsen and Celar without anything coming in. Accounts potentially declaring this income from July/Aug 2024 don’t have to be shared until March 2026.
3) Les/Hoos/local were all lying all those years back and it wasn’t 20% fee, it was 15% of profit.
I find the latter hard to believe. It was universally reported as 20% of the total fee… That would mean it is one of options 1 or 2.
As Clive has said, we’ll find out by March ‘27 or based on our activity in the next week or so! |
Agree with all this. Interesting (to me) that all the people who used to get stuff leaked by the club in the pre-Nourry era say it's 20% and all those who get stuff leaked now say it's 15%.
Imagine there's probably some news management of the fee being paid now too by Palace and Arsenal so who knows what's really due. At least something's due. It's not really anyone's interest for the world to know how much. [Post edited 21 Aug 14:14]
| | | |
| Eze on 14:23 - Aug 21 with 188 views | JamesB1979 |
| Eze on 14:02 - Aug 21 by Hunterhoop |
I’ve found this interesting. There are a few possible answers:
1) the club want everyone to think we’ve received less than we actually have (competitive advantage and all that) was it will temper inflation on any transfer fees or wages we might need to offer. Wise
2) we have already bought Palace out of some of it (which might explain last summer’s outlay on Madsen and Celar without anything coming in. Accounts potentially declaring this income from July/Aug 2024 don’t have to be shared until March 2026.
3) Les/Hoos/local were all lying all those years back and it wasn’t 20% fee, it was 15% of profit.
I find the latter hard to believe. It was universally reported as 20% of the total fee… That would mean it is one of options 1 or 2.
As Clive has said, we’ll find out by March ‘27 or based on our activity in the next week or so! |
Thought it might be lower of 15% proceeds and 20% of profit. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
